Konkona Sen on opting to not watch Animal - Page 10

No problem...

My knowledge about human nature tells me that Vanga did exactly that...and that had been only for a relative short span of time....

there are people who invest much more to get what they want to achieve...

Actually, Vanga just proved that humans may have evolved in terms of technology and other things that don't involve feelings, but otherwise it's still Stone Age

Edit: the tagging was 'in vain'...this post is an answer to Doga's

Originally posted by: Saleem-Pheku

Someone will spend crores of rupees, devote years of their lifetime to not only write a story, but write the script, direct it and then edit it.... and then after release again spend moths to re-edit for OTT... all this simply to rile people up?

I'll have to disagree, sorry.

Originally posted by: Clochette

If you're serious then it exactly reflects Vanga's mindset...I would then say: falling for destructive instincts and male power-dreams is quite a proof of certain shortcomings

Clo_ That's why exchanging beliefs and ideas are enriching.

We are in a real world where violence and wars are everywhere.

The movie is simply stretching, and entertaining us with these cause & effects that create some of these traits. In the end it's just a movie

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

https://x.com/SumitkadeI/status/1748695116456272054?s=20

Will probably make another 10-15 cr before OTT release

Originally posted by: rckRadhe

Will probably make another 10-15 cr before OTT release

Exactly, rck, exactly...

otherwise why would there exist soft p*rn, hard p*rn, splatter movies, snuff films etc., etc. ...it's all just for 'entertaining'...

Edit: just an afterthought...strange, that those movies predominently cater to males...right?

Originally posted by: wat_up

oh please he needs to stop inflating numbers

After OTT he won't be able to inflate anymore

Originally posted by: Filmistan

The first half is entertaining but the second half was all over the place. Still can't understand how it turned out to be such a big hit. It's not really that good of a movie.

Originally posted by: Clochette

Exactly, rck, exactly...

otherwise why would there exist soft p*rn, hard p*rn, splatter movies, snuff films etc., etc. ...it's all just for 'entertaining'...

Edit: just an afterthought...strage, that those movies predominently cater to males...right?

Er.. ahem...

After dragging Vanga over the coals, now you've turned your attention towards all males in general. Gulp. I'm gonna run for my life...

Originally posted by: Filmistan

The first half is entertaining but the second half was all over the place. Still can't understand how it turned out to be such a big hit. It's not really that good of a movie.

Exactly ... Sounds like the exact reviews for Tiger 3 ... Which was a Hit ...Wasn't it or was it?

Originally posted by: rckRadhe

Exactly ... Sounds like the exact reviews for Tiger 3 ... Which was a Hit ...Wasn't it or was it?