Animal starting wave of violence against women - Page 6

Originally posted by: Newbird

Kuch bhi, criminals want excuse to put blame on someone else or something else for their criminal Minds or criminal deeds, atleast we normal humans should not be justifying those who commit violence against women by deviating the blame on someone else.

We can criticize or accuse vanga for glorifying the violence but deviating the blame from the actual accusers who commites crime or violence is equal to justifying their acts.

I red only the title.

Vanga's Animal Movie theme of 'Alphas'

With Alphas this problem doesn't exist. It's very clear to see that ...

One hasn't been in the wonderful and prestigious company of Alphas

Originally posted by: carisma2

Most people will know that what is shown in the movie is wrong and they are not to enact that. I also agree there are immature people who will feel inspired. I was talking to a friend earlier today and she said apparently this guy was harassing and stalking a girl. When the case went to court he said 'This is how the guys in the movies get the girl', that's where I learnt it from.

The courts let him go.

There are reasons, why even English films are refused and movies are certified, because they carry a chance of influence especially on the younger minds. But there are adults with immature minds and cannot differentiate the difference because of their own sadistic nature.

I think we can watch a movie, if we can handle it. I do not think the movie should have been promoted this heavily, which indicates that this is a 'thumbs up' all good movie.

They can let go off the violence shown in western movies and are less likely to get influenced compared to movies made within their own culture and closer to home, taking it as something acceptable.

Imagine if a movie like profile was made by Hindi cinema and people were promoting it. I think people would look at it more differently. profile was a good movie, but we cannot support the male lead and support the concept shown. In the same way, same rules apply to violent and objective films.

That' how I balance it.

Regarding the Indian man accused of stalking in Australia that you referred to, he was not let go. This is a common disinformation..

He pleaded guilty, he was given a community release order and restraining order. He just escaped jail time and conviction record because he accepted responsibility and showed remorse. More so, he was engaged in messaging and calling excessively which doesnt amount to a crime worthy of prison sentence in Australia if that is a first time offence. But he was not free of charge, he was found guilty. If he offends again, violating his bond and restraining order, he will be sentenced to prison time.

I mean courts are not that stupid to find a man not guilty despite him pleading guilty

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

There is this clip of Abbas Mastan talking about Baazigar. They are reacting to theatre crowds cheering Shahrukh Khan throwing Shilpa Shetty from the rooftop. They are shocked and wonder how the audience can react like that.

The scene depicted violence against women. The audience cheered violence against women. However, the makers did not intend to glorify violence. They realized the impact was not what they intended and have always maintained that it was an evil act that should not have been cheered.

Animal has multiple scenes of violence and misogyny. But Sandeep Reddy Vanga has refused to criticize the actions of the hero. Instead, he doubles down in his justification of the hero. He goes as far as to mocking critics who dislike the hero.

A movie is just one aspect of things that encourages certain actions. But the second aspect is society and people - whether we reinforce that action or not. And herein lies the difference - Animal is just the cinematic representation of behavior SRV is reinforcing in society.

Animal has done well too, so no clue why Vanga feels the need to defend and justify the "hero" so much.

Originally posted by: RaniPreityAish

These stats are directed towards the besharam users who thought it was funny to read about a woman being stabbed 15 times and beheaded by her husband because she wasn't fast enough to make him tea.

According to this article, crime is down overall in India but crimes against women have INCREASED. There is more than an average of 1000 crimes against women PER DAY.

40% of these crimes against women are committed by the husband. Does that shock anyone who saw how Ranbir and Bobby treated their wives in Animal?

https://www.rediff.com/news/special/1000-cases-of-violence-against-women-daily/20231218.htm

Please don't bother with anyone. It is better to pay attention to good men like Bajrang Punia

https://thewire.in/rights/cant-live-as-padma-shri-awardee-when-women-wrestlers-are-insulted-bajrang-punia-to-pm-modi

Originally posted by: Novarieaa

Regarding the Indian man accused of stalking in Australia that you referred to, he was not let go. This is a common disinformation..

He pleaded guilty, he was given a community release order and restraining order. He just escaped jail time and conviction record because he accepted responsibility and showed remorse. More so, he was engaged in messaging and calling excessively which doesnt amount to a crime worthy of prison sentence in Australia if that is a first time offence. But he was not free of charge, he was found guilty. If he offends again, violating his bond and restraining order, he will be sentenced to prison time.

I mean courts are not that stupid to find a man not guilty despite him pleading guilty

Phew! Thanks for the detailed narration, it is the same story. He was working in Australia and stalked 2 women. My friend said he was let off. She never said about restraining order. Do u know of Bollywood was mentioned during the case?

Originally posted by: rckRadhe

Vanga's Animal Movie theme of 'Alphas'

With Alphas this problem doesn't exist. It's very clear to see that ...

One hasn't been in the wonderful and prestigious company of Alphas

Can you eloborate what you are trying to say!!! I understood nothing except that first line that Animal movie is theme of Alphas!

@Red

If you are trying to say I'm an Alpha female, I agree that I'm an Alpha female. If you google what is Alpha female - Alpha female or Alpha male doesn't necessarily be negative like they showed in Animal movie. They can be positive or negative. I consider myself positive one.

@bold

Are you trying to say I have never been in company of Alpha males and that's why this problem with Animal doesn't exist for me?.. Bruh I was the one of those who bashed vanga left and right for showing women as doormats and i was scared to see the violence. I was in a relationship with a Negative Alpha male in my college. So dont tell me about my past without even knowing it. As a positive Alpha female couldn't tolerate the shit by negative Alpha male like my EX in my college, so it ended up into ugly break up. Uhh so plss..

At this point I'm wondering what you exactly meant in your post!.. SMH.

Originally posted by: Newbird

Can you eloborate what you are trying to say!!! I understood nothing except that first line that Animal movie is theme of Alphas!

@Red

If you are trying to say I'm an Alpha female, I agree that I'm an Alpha female. If you google what is Alpha female - Alpha female or Alpha male doesn't necessarily be negative like they showed in Animal movie. They can be positive or negative. I consider myself positive one.

@bold

Are you trying to say I have never been in company of Alpha males and that's why this problem with Animal doesn't exist for me?.. Bruh I was the one of those who bashed vanga left and right for showing women as doormats and i was scared to see the violence. I was in a relationship with a Negative Alpha male in my college. So dont tell me about my past without even knowing it. As a positive Alpha female couldn't tolerate the shit by negative Alpha male like my EX in my college, so it ended up into ugly break up. Uhh so plss..

At this point I'm wondering what you exactly meant in your post!.. SMH.

Watched the movie?

Originally posted by: Petrichor80

Animal has done well too, so no clue why Vanga feels the need to defend and justify the "hero" so much.

Vanga may be of the ambitious notion that ...

Animal could pass Pathaan in India's gross collections

Originally posted by: rckRadhe

Watched the movie?

No, have not. I don't need to watch it to know what kind of movie it is. I already saw the sample of Vanga movies in the form of Arjun reddy, so i know what kind of movies he do and i red enough reviews of the movie and red previous interview of Vanga to know what kind of MCP he is.

But at the same time i dont want to justify people who do violence against women by deviating the blame of their offense on something else. I hold 100% accountability of the violence on the accuser who committed the crime or violence. Deviating the blame of violence from the accuser onto anything else is equal to justifying their act of violence or crime as i already mentioned in my post in previous page.

BTW first answer my question. You are asking more questions without answering mine!

I'm writing essays like a crazy woman without knowing exactly what you meant bcz your post drived me insane thinking about various possibilities of what you meant!

Originally posted by: Petrichor80

Animal has done well too, so no clue why Vanga feels the need to defend and justify the "hero" so much.

It’s the Nouveau Riche mentality at work. Kinda like when Neeta Ambani and co didn’t think being loaded was enough, they had to make Bollywood folks dance at their beck and call, too. Oh and serve food at their weddings. They want it all. Including universal respect for a polarizing product. No solulu for this level of delulu.