What If Kabir Oberoi related to both Neil & DB? - Page 3

Originally posted by: Simple_self

If Neil gets Krishna parallel it will give big twist to the story he might start hating mahajans again

He might become business rival of mahajans

We will get yuvika vs neil ( in healthy business way)also he will have good hold on business decisions if he acquire mahajans shares by this he can help yuvika too

@ bold, I dont think they will show that. This will mean Yuvika vs Neil (even for a small time) that would not be liked by many, since he is to guide Yuvika in her business decisions.

Agree with rest of it, highly possible

Originally posted by: A_for_Arpita

Ok

Vidur is way too loyal for that though

Aacha I wanted to ask this to you from a long time but bhool jati hnu, do you believe that the Krishna of Gakul and Vasudeva Krishna in Mahabharata both are SAME person? There are some controversies regarding this right? What do YOU BELIEVE?

This is a new age discussion that has come up, since characteristics of Gokul Krishna and Krishna in Mahabharat is very different. All the more we never hear of Nand or Yashoda in later time, its highly doubtful that Krishna was so self centered that he didn't ever visit his adoptive parents (forget bringing them to his new place)

Few also say Vasudev and Vrishni heroes (the clan of Krishna) were a different segment which was worshipped and later got embedded into Narayana and then Vaishanava cult, especially since Vrishni heroes (especially Vasudeva and Samkarshan) were all given equal respect everywhere, unlike Krishna-Balarama where Krishna is worshipped way more.

If you ask me, I don't think this is possible or true, they are essentially the same people, just that different aspects and characteristics are showcased in each of the segments. Gokul is about his childhood innocence and Mathura is about his strength and decision making while Dwarika & Mahabharat focuses more on his political acumen, since this is a recorded version (itihasa-not necessarily history) hence only the features necessary to the flow is mentioned at any place

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

This is a new age discussion that has come up, since characteristics of Gokul Krishna and Krishna in Mahabharat is very different. All the more we never hear of Nand or Yashoda in later time, its highly doubtful that Krishna was so self centered that he didn't ever visit his adoptive parents (forget bringing them to his new place)

Few also say Vasudev and Vrishni heroes (the clan of Krishna) were a different segment which was worshipped and later got embedded into Narayana and then Vaishanava cult, especially since Vrishni heroes (especially Vasudeva and Samkarshan) were all given equal respect everywhere, unlike Krishna-Balarama where Krishna is worshipped way more.

If you ask me, I don't think this is possible or true, they are essentially the same people, just that different aspects and characteristics are showcased in each of the segments. Gokul is about his childhood innocence and Mathura is about his strength and decision making while Dwarika & Mahabharat focuses more on his political acumen, since this is a recorded version (itihasa-not necessarily history) hence only the features necessary to the flow is mentioned at any place

Aacha! See both being different in characters even I believe is more about same person being different in childhood/teenage and adulthood thing. Whole Gakul-Mathura phase was different. Mahabharata required a different Krishna that's why he was different there.

About Yasodha and Nand, may be they weren't alive during Krishna Rukmini marriage time, do we have any sources that proves otherwise?

I wouldn't mind Neil's family backdrop until my Papa-Betu son is out of that 'judaii' wala shit. Would be interesting to watch if Kabir turns out to be a relative from either sides.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

No I did write Bhidur

Illegitimate child of Bhumi with Vidur (teenage pregnancy), Kunti Karna parallel

Pete where are you?

Originally posted by: A_for_Arpita

Aacha! See both being different in characters even I believe is more about same person being different in childhood/teenage and adulthood thing. Whole Gakul-Mathura phase was different. Mahabharata required a different Krishna that's why he was different there.

About Yasodha and Nand, may be they weren't alive during Krishna Rukmini marriage time, do we have any sources that proves otherwise?

@ brown, no there are completely forgotten, nothing at all about them

Yes, thats what I think they only highlighted the events relevant, didn't focus on what the character was thinking or any monologue, so same person behaves differently at different places, that is what happened here

Originally posted by: A_for_Arpita

She didn't make Krishna as in Neil illegitimate

According to her Neil is OBEROI's VANSHAJ 🎲

She made Kabir as in Karna Illegitimate

Han DB ka BETA Prem, Dhanraj se BADA hoga

I don't think Oberoi is DB's Biological Son, if Writers actually picks up Pete's theory out of their love for Pete that's different

They would've given Bhidur apology if they had loved Pete 🚶🏼‍♂️🚶🏼‍♂️🚶🏼‍♂️🚶🏼‍♂️

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Achha I misread it there. yes Kabir was illegitimate in this theory so this is possible, also Kabir is Bua's son of Neil (like Karna was Krishna's Bua's son)

Kabir is then at least 20 years elder to Neil (elder than Vidur since Vidur and Prem were friends of same age group)

See I too want Kabir to be DB's son (or else Bhumi's son before marriage), but in that case it should be after the Prem, Dhanraj, Subhadra grew up and had their love life(before marriage) when DB realized what he is missing in his life and hence got with someone else

But I really want Neil to be someone else's son, for a proper Krishna parallel

Waise Pete ki theory sach karni hai to let Kabir be illegitimate son of Bhidur..

I never wanted Kabir to be Bhidur's son , i want him to be Dadababu's son so that we can get Evil Dadababu

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

No I did write Bhidur

Illegitimate child of Bhumi with Vidur (teenage pregnancy), Kunti Karna parallel

You took my ship to the next level

This is why Vidur is agianst NeiVika's relationship

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

This is a new age discussion that has come up, since characteristics of Gokul Krishna and Krishna in Mahabharat is very different. All the more we never hear of Nand or Yashoda in later time, its highly doubtful that Krishna was so self centered that he didn't ever visit his adoptive parents (forget bringing them to his new place)

Few also say Vasudev and Vrishni heroes (the clan of Krishna) were a different segment which was worshipped and later got embedded into Narayana and then Vaishanava cult, especially since Vrishni heroes (especially Vasudeva and Samkarshan) were all given equal respect everywhere, unlike Krishna-Balarama where Krishna is worshipped way more.

If you ask me, I don't think this is possible or true, they are essentially the same people, just that different aspects and characteristics are showcased in each of the segments. Gokul is about his childhood innocence and Mathura is about his strength and decision making while Dwarika & Mahabharat focuses more on his political acumen, since this is a recorded version (itihasa-not necessarily history) hence only the features necessary to the flow is mentioned at any place

Can you please explain more about this in detail in GDT4 whenever you're free? This is interesting and i would like to know more about this