💞Beautiful Seasons of Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai💞[DTNt:pg-30,151] - Page 96

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0jwXz4vWXS/?igshid=YWYwM2I1ZDdmOQ==

Ending galat hai 🤣🤣🤣

💔

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0l3O0aP7Q9/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

Originally posted by: KaunIMEMYSELF

Yeah Sneha! I got it. I too am not against moving on in life.

I was mentioning why she was able to move on with another marriage, within 3-4 months of her husband's passing, while still loving only him.

1. She knew for sure 'Navji wasn't coming back, so there was no hope there.

2. She didn't know about the baby when she proposed Abhi for marriage.

And the makers have clearly mentioned that she was doing all this for Abhir and his happiness.

In the past too, she married 'Navji after 3-4 months after WD, so Abhir can have a complete family; and later too she was about to marry Abhi after 3-4 months after 'Navji's passing, again so Abhir can have a complete family. She did love only Abhi and not 'Nav when she married 'Navji and she loved 'Navji and not Abhi when she agreed to marry Abhi. [I am assuming that she couldn't have stopped loving Abhi suddenly after WD. She could be super mad, hurt and bitter at him, but love doesn't suddenly stop with a signature or a phone call IMO]. So inshort, for her, marrying either man had nothing to do with loving him, she did it just for Abhir and later for her unborn baby.

In the past 'Navji was an easy option for fatherji and husbandji because he followed her, forcefully stayed with her and didn't leave her alone [due to his inherent goodness and inability to leave a weak, clearly-not-in-her-senses high-risk pregnant woman alone, he just couldn't walk away!] and now Abhi was an even easier option for becoming her husband, as he is Abhir's dad, he is tied to her as he cannot stay away from them; also, he was guilt-ridden for not having been by her side during Abhir; he also felt he owed Sharmaji for all he did for Abhir/AK, and also because he hopelessly still loved only her!

I feel that you and many others are feeling hurt by her moving on so soon because you really liked AkshNav! But then makers would miss out on the drama which unfolded on white-wedding day, her abortion drama, Manjari maa's worries and demands, Abhi's never-ending redemption arc which finally ended by him doubting that his maa pushed Aksharaji, and him leaving his maa, Ruh and his whole life to be with Aksharaji! this was all TRP rich drama! All of this wouldn't have worked with a 3 year gap! I still cannot believe they showed so much in such less time, first blame-game, court drama, Abhir's depression, Abhi's slow but steady increased presence in his son's life, co-existing peacefullynand co-parenting Abhir, friendship zone, Abhi's memories and feelings triggered by the proximity; his no-nonsense, to-the-point clearly one-sided love confession, then Abhir's insistence for a complete family, her intial rejection, then proposal, abhi's hesitance and then finally wedding! They covered so much in so less time!

Nevertheless showing her moving on within 3-4 months, I agree was in bad taste! But when did the makers care for our sentiments? They had shown AK in bad light multiple times earlier too...Just that what you felt now, Abhira fans have been feeling the pain, prickle and stabbing since long and it went on for 8 long months!

Aksharji, while apparently falling in love and moving closer to 'Navji on one side, she is clearly shown crossing lines and boundaries with Abhi multiple times.... she had locked eyes a little longer than necessary multiple times; she shoved, held his collar and manhandled him with authority multiple times; she fainted into his arms multiple times; she cried for him, hugged him, always acted out with him, sometimes coyly too.. while makers played 'Jaaniye' in the background... makers showed it as either her anger, her helplessness, her tashan, her self-respect, her pity, her altruism, etc etc. wrt Abhi...some thing or other, but she always had a connection with Abhi and after a while, it was not pleasant; since all this was happening when she had set her mind to love 'Navji and remain his wife!

This was how the makers were showing a strong woman who falls out of love with a man who she thought wronged her and was giving herself a second chance at love with her current husband who stood by her like a rock, giving his unwavering support. There was no dignity given to AK's character. No wonder Abhira hopefuls never believed AkshNav were the end game for a very very long time. Infact they just got tired and exhausted waiting for her to makeup her mind, story was progressing towards AkshNav and individual scenes and eye-meets indicated Abhira! They showed her like that for 8 months!

After a certain progression, when I realized AkshNav are going to be together, comparatively earlier on in the story(I never was too keen on Abhira, maybe thats why, I felt it earlier on than Abhira fans); I remember, in many instances feeling uncomfortable watching the proximity between Ak and Abhi and it just felt wrong! And sometimes 'Navji too was standing there like the rest of the family!

Abhi's worry, his concern for her, him looking or caring for her reaction/feelings first before anyone, when something happened, felt just normal, didn't ever feel wrong, because he had always been clear that he would never love anyone else, he couldn't and he never intended to try too. And most of all he never crossed his limits after temple confession and the 'final nail in the Abhira's coffin' : his enlightenment after her revelation of what she felt about him, their relationship, and marriage!! But AK on the other hand, was written with no dignity or respect IMO. They made mockery of a woman who rose against adversary and rebuild her life with a supporting partner (Atleast in her head, this is what she thought of her situation, but her actions didn't do justice to her own thinking) This made her look fickle-minded, indecisive, opportunistic, selfish, mean, manipulative and many more such adjectives; to the point where, like you mentioned, neither Abhira fans not Akshnav fans liked her anymore!

Ps: Sorry for the long post!

I agree to most of it , disagree to some but yes, i get what you are saying. Sorry, busy with work so unable to give a proper reply.

Abhimanyu loved Akshara but him not being able to move on is not Akshara's fault. He divorced her, so she has every right to move on and marry whoever she wants.

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

I agree to most of it , disagree to some but yes, i get what you are saying. Sorry, busy with work so unable to give a proper reply.

Abhimanyu loved Akshara but him not being able to move on is not Akshara's fault. He divorced her, so she has every right to move on and marry whoever she wants.

💯Him not moving on and still loving married woman is not her fault

https://x.com/apricity_joy/status/1733159184278176101?s=20

https://x.com/iam_ani9/status/1733167608575459536?s=20

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

I agree to most of it , disagree to some but yes, i get what you are saying. Sorry, busy with work so unable to give a proper reply.

Abhimanyu loved Akshara but him not being able to move on is not Akshara's fault. He divorced her, so she has every right to move on and marry whoever she wants.

People are calling out ruhi for marrying even after loving arman. What akshara did was same too. She never loved abhinav. Ruhi wanted to stay closer to armaan so she married him . Akshara wanted to stay away from abhimanyu and wanted to give a father to her kid so she married abhinav. But what about rohith and abhinav. Don't they have expectations from their wife.

Both women took men as granted just because akshara rejected abhimanyu one day but still continued her nain matakka with abhimanyu. As soon as abhinav died she was readily was about to replace him .her love for abhimanyu and abhinav both were shallow.

I personally believe akshara is really a wrong representation of how a women should be. I like og akshara but i hate akshara sharma as she literally used everyone like tissue paper. If abhimanyu would have married akshara she would have never remembered abhinav and everyone will definitely agree on that as ppl were literally happy when abhi died knowing her nature 😂

People atleast had hopes from abhi that he will tell abhira about abhinav but nobody hoped that akshara would tell. As she literally hides things 😂

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

move on does not mean just finding a random fatherji to her son. She should whole heartedly accept him as her husband. It's a wrong definition to show move on means marry and try if you can move on.

People are calling out ruhi for marrying even after loving arman. What akshara did was same too. She never loved abhinav. Ruhi wanted to stay closer to armaan so she married him . Akshara wanted to stay away from abhimanyu and wanted to give a father to her kid so she married abhinav. But what about rohith and abhinav. Don't they have expectations from their wife.

Both women took men as granted just because akshara rejected abhimanyu one day but still continued her nain matakka with abhimanyu. As soon as abhinav died she was readily was about to replace him .her love for abhimanyu and abhinav both were shallow.

I personally believe akshara is really a wrong representation of how a women should be. I like og akshara but i hate akshara sharma as she literally used everyone like tissue paper. If abhimanyu would have married akshara she would have never remembered abhinav and everyone will definitely agree on that as ppl were literally happy when abhi died knowing her nature 😂

People atleast had hopes from abhi that he will tell abhira about abhinav but nobody hoped that akshara would tell. As she literally hides things 😂

Ruhi marrying rohit wanting to stay beside armaan is indeed bad. Rohit is good wanting to start relation with being friends with roohi. What I feel is seeing rohit goodness she will try to give the marriage a chance. If that is shown it will be the actual definition of moving on just like arohi moving on from Abhimanyu with Neil.

In the bts coming ruhi is shown supporting abhira, so she will only turn against abhira if she came to know her being akshara's daughter. And the villan yuvraj track is running parallel also. Maker's are also giving scene parallel to akshara and abhimanyu to roohi and rohit where rohit helps ruhi in arranging closet.

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

I agree to most of it , disagree to some but yes, i get what you are saying. Sorry, busy with work so unable to give a proper reply.

Abhimanyu loved Akshara but him not being able to move on is not Akshara's fault. He divorced her, so she has every right to move on and marry whoever she wants.

Yup! It's not Akshara's fault Abhi couldn't move on to loving someone else. It's just how Abhi is! The first time he met Akshu, he had said, shayad mera hona aap ke liye hi hai! She was 'love' for him! Till her met her, he had never believed in love, he didn't want to lose himself to it, usko padna hi nahin tha in sab mein... Even in the toughest times, when he was his angriest, during their fights, leap 1 and later in leap 2, he had only said one thing... he loved only her, he cannot love anyone else!

So it is not Akshara's fault, he could not move on! It is Abhi's bad luck he fell in love with her! She didn't deserve his love!

And yes, since he divorced her, she has every right to move on and marry someone else! It wasn't wrong of her to go find someone else to marry and reset her life. But having a 'right' to do something, is different than doing the Right' thing!

That being said, if Abhi somehow had caused Kairav's or Aaru's or Bade papa's death,(he could not, because he has brains!) but imagine if his actions lead to their deaths...If Aaru had taken her life when Abhi didn't turn up for the wedding, or if Kairav had taken his life after Abhi brought in the reporters... He too wouldn't have been directly responsible for the murders, just like how Akshara too didn't cause Neil's murder or the babies' deaths! Because Akshu supporters seem to be backing Akshu saying she is not responsible for Neil's murder, as she didn't hold the knife or she didn't hire those goons to kill him! And the death of babies is not even debatable, it can only be termed as negligence, not accident!

Anyway, if Aaru or Kairav had died, Aksharaji would've done 10 times more halla than what Abhi had done during WD! But he would've understood her mental state at the time, he would've understood why she said whatever she said! And Abhi not only would've felt guilty and responsible, he would've apologized to her and the entire family... not when everyone is mourning near the body, because it is not the time! his guilt, his feelings and his redemption wouldn't have been important then, he wouldn't be important! He would've waiting for the right time to talk and clear things! And then he would've helped pick up the pieces and help put together her life back!

Which he kind of did, after 'Navji's death! She didn't believe his innocence, blamed him, manhandled him, yelled at him, cursed him, got him arrested, and vowed to bring justice to 'Navji by letting him rot in prison! But Abhi didn't hold grudges, he explained his side of the story when she had calmed down and was in a position to listen, when she was ready, he talked! After his release, he came home, supported and comforted her, and concentrated on Abhir's recovery and happiness. He wasn't even married to her then!

So though she had a right to do everything she did, she was far from being RIGHT ! She was never right for him!

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

move on does not mean just finding a random fatherji to her son. She should whole heartedly accept him as her husband. It's a wrong definition to show move on means marry and try if you can move on.

People are calling out ruhi for marrying even after loving arman. What akshara did was same too. She never loved abhinav. Ruhi wanted to stay closer to armaan so she married him . Akshara wanted to stay away from abhimanyu and wanted to give a father to her kid so she married abhinav. But what about rohith and abhinav. Don't they have expectations from their wife.

Both women took men as granted just because akshara rejected abhimanyu one day but still continued her nain matakka with abhimanyu. As soon as abhinav died she was readily was about to replace him .her love for abhimanyu and abhinav both were shallow.

I personally believe akshara is really a wrong representation of how a women should be. I like og akshara but i hate akshara sharma as she literally used everyone like tissue paper. If abhimanyu would have married akshara she would have never remembered abhinav and everyone will definitely agree on that as ppl were literally happy when abhi died knowing her nature 😂

People atleast had hopes from abhi that he will tell abhira about abhinav but nobody hoped that akshara would tell. As she literally hides things 😂

So true! Akshara is a wrong representation of women! I feel that in iTV, if a character is made a lead, she should be written so people can root for her, clap at her strength, her choices, learn from her, emulate her attitude, especially since a daily soap characters, unlike movie characters, are very close to people's hearts, they are part of our everyday lives! And Akshara is so wrong on so many levels!

And yes! I agree that if Mrs. Sharma would've married Abhi, the whole concentration and story progression would be on changing dynamics between them, co-parents to friendship to dependency to pata nahin kya kya! Yuck! 'Navji would've been left as a photo frame on the wall with sandalwood mala which doesn't need to be replaced!

Thank god Abhi didnt marry her and he and Abhir didn't get to live long alone with her!