Teri Meri Doriyaann Episode Discussion Thread - 31 - Page 95

Originally posted by: sriarshi

Mongas disowned Seerat when? Now they did before not na🤷‍♀️ before they also said Seerat suffered so much 🤷‍♀️ What they did before? I already said if Angad stopping cant stop any parents get away from responsibilities..Did they got any match for her? Why Angad do her marriage when her parents alive? He suggested marriage he never forced all chose what they want 👍 When people chose something they need to accept it whatever it will bring...Bec kids are adults they take decisions parents have no rights? If they do mistakes disowning is correct thats it👏

why cant they complain as Keerat said Seerat is reason for Sahiba death then why they left Seerat is my question..Either their love for Sahiba is fake or they still love Seerat want a better a life so not involving her in police case 🤷‍♀️

Wahi when Seerat did like Rumi 😂 to show some physical violence..Writers not doing bec they can keep Seerat intact even Gary come back she can stay there..Otherwise one scene is enough Angad can trash her and throw her but writers idea is diff and they can Rumi like this and Sahiba like that and matter if time Angad also do that but they kept Seerat intact and whitewashing her. And they show her actions to characters like she is victim or did mistake now repenting😂 just bec she is Angad ex all show him anger but not one character till now showed any extreme reaction to her none 😂

even Keerat say big dialogues but never say what her Seerat di capable of and Same Sahiba 😂 All ok with Seerat di then why Angad need to bother when he dont have any bad intentions and why he need to prove fr shameless Seerat when her blood sisters ok with it🤩😏

Originally posted by: A.Theepa

If he had no intention to marry seerat then why would he think about what seerat doing . He wants to cleared that to Sahiba that’s why he followed her . Like Sahiba said she’s Angad wife to Romi Angad also said to Seerat Sahiba is his everything he didn’t attacked seerat like Sahiba attacking Romi because seerat isn’t doing any violence like Romi she just using people emotions & like how Rumi not accepting the truth Seerat also not ready to accept the truth

Originally posted by: A.Theepa

If he had no intention to marry seerat then why would he think about what seerat doing . He wants to cleared that to Sahiba that’s why he followed her . Like Sahiba said she’s Angad wife to Romi Angad also said to Seerat Sahiba is his everything he didn’t attacked seerat like Sahiba attacking Romi because seerat isn’t doing any violence like Romi she just using people emotions & like how Rumi not accepting the truth Seerat also not ready to accept the truth

In Daarji kaand, when sahiba was begging angad to believe her, and he threw remote and was not least bit concerned about her hand injury, if I remember correctly people said what can he do..it's Sahiba's video irrefutable proof and hence what angad did was A Ok.

But now it's other way round with a much more severe crime as murder where all circumstantial evidence is against angad with a strong motive as per marriage announcement then angad still should get benefit of doubt. Double standards much?

Originally posted by: sriarshi

Wahi when Seerat did like Rumi 😂 to show some physical violence..Writers not doing bec they can keep Seerat intact even Gary come back she can stay there..Otherwise one scene is enough Angad can trash her and throw her but writers idea is diff and they can Rumi like this and Sahiba like that and matter if time Angad also do that but they kept Seerat intact and whitewashing her. And they show her actions to characters like she is victim or did mistake now repenting😂 just bec she is Angad ex all show him anger but not one character till now showed any extreme reaction to her none 😂

even Keerat say big dialogues but never say what her Seerat di capable of and Same Sahiba 😂 All ok with Seerat di then why Angad need to bother when he dont have any bad intentions and why he need to prove fr shameless Seerat when her blood sisters ok with it🤩😏

Originally posted by: sriarshi

Mongas disowned Seerat when? Now they did before not na🤷‍♀️ before they also said Seerat suffered so much 🤷‍♀️ What they did before? I already said if Angad stopping cant stop any parents get away from responsibilities..Did they got any match for her? Why Angad do her marriage when her parents alive? He suggested marriage he never forced all chose what they want 👍 When people chose something they need to accept it whatever it will bring...Bec kids are adults they take decisions parents have no rights? If they do mistakes disowning is correct thats it👏

why cant they complain as Keerat said Seerat is reason for Sahiba death then why they left Seerat is my question..Either their love for Sahiba is fake or they still love Seerat want a better a life so not involving her in police case 🤷‍♀️

Mongas are bad parents to Sahiba definitely. No questioning that. Now whether they want Seerat to have a better life or don't want her anywhere around is upto interpretation, I guess last hafte ki trp iss hafte aayegi toh that might help clear any doubts about how to interpret.

To me it is clear, what Mongas do is inconsequential, Angad wants Seerat by hook or crook near him he will have her, both want to be near each other so Mongas and Brars opinions are inconsequential. What Manveer wants, what Inder wants, what Santosh wants are all pointless discussions. Manveer Inder did not want Seerat in house, Angad did so he got her. Santosh wanted to take Seerat, Angad did not want her to go so she stopped, Santosh cannot drag an adult daughter back. If both Seerat and Angad want each other, our opinions don't matter.

Sahiba , if she wants Angad should make peace with anything Seerat changes for Angad.

Yes Santosh is a bad mom, she has time and again pushed Sahiba to stay with Brars and still won't learn.

Sahiba has agency of her own, Seerat does too, Angad does, if Angad wants Seerat in Brar mansion no one can help it, if Sahiba wants to live with such a man, no one can help her.

Bec kids are adults no responsibility then why question Seerat 😂 she want to marry Angad by destroying her sister marriage is ok🤩 may be this is normal for mongas if not one sister other sister can stay in Brar mansion👍

So Sahiba never blamed Seerat Di and now monga parents not involving Seerat Di in police case 👏👏 Got it🤩 Hope now they disowned her so even she do anything to anyone hope they wont blame bec Seerat is not their responsibility anymore and Seerat di happily can destroy all people lifes 🤩😏

Originally posted by: Radhika_r

again you are saying mongas responsibility? 😂😂😂😂😂😂Monga have responsibility to come only when one dies and get publicity otherwise no 😂😂😂😂😂😂 both daughters thru fraud marraige are Brar responsibility 😂😂😂😂 brar’s can suffer as long as they want to and then throw them out but mongas not responsible for their daughters or their actions 😂😂😂😂😂they will come to scen only when daughter dies 😂😂😂poor people yaar what they will do???? Brar fully responsible for their daughters upbringing also and their actions also so mongas can’t do anything 😂😂😂😂 if brars ok let them suffer but don’t you dare say Monga parents responsible 😂😂😂😂

Originally posted by: Ashviniv

In Daarji kaand, when sahiba was begging angad to believe her, and he threw remote and was not least bit concerned about her hand injury, if I remember correctly people said what can he do..it's Sahiba's video irrefutable proof and hence what angad did was A Ok.

But now it's other way round with a much more severe crime as murder where all circumstantial evidence is against angad with a strong motive as per marriage announcement then angad still should get benefit of doubt. Double standards much?

I did not care much what Brars said . But Angad led the charge. He threw remote, he was worried about himself going to jail when he saw her hand covered in blood. There were so many lessons for Sahiba in that track that she refused to take.

Here Sahiba is repenting, doing everything to escape a gun wielding psycho to save Angad.

The lesson from this should be to not let stalkers and people who force women escape law, no matter their excuse. But I am OK if her lesson is to learn to adjust to her sister doing most of the things a wife should with her husband. Because faltu ka hadd main raho bolne se kya faayda; jab Angad ko hadd pata nahi hai toh dusri aurat ko kaahe lecture.

Originally posted by: sriarshi

Bec kids are adults no responsibility then why question Seerat 😂 she want to marry Angad by destroying her sister marriage is ok🤩 may be this is normal for mongas if not one sister other sister can stay in Brar mansion👍

So Sahiba never blamed Seerat Di and now monga parents not involving Seerat Di in police case 👏👏 Got it🤩 Hope now they disowned her so even she do anything to anyone hope they wont blame bec Seerat is not their responsibility anymore and Seerat di happily can destroy all people lifes 🤩😏

Originally posted by: hellodona

I did not care much what Brars said . But Angad led the charge. He threw remote, he was worried about himself going to jail when he saw her hand covered in blood. There were so many lessons for Sahiba in that track that she refused to take.

Here Sahiba is repenting, doing everything to escape a gun wielding psycho to save Angad.

The lesson from this should be to not let stalkers and people who force women escape law, no matter their excuse. But I am OK if her lesson is to learn to adjust to her sister doing most of the things a wife should with her husband. Because faltu ka hadd main raho bolne se kya faayda; jab Angad ko hadd pata nahi hai toh dusri aurat ko kaahe lecture.

Yes if sahiba decides to stay with angad after all this (which makers will show) then it's on her and accepting doormat life in brar mansion. Seerat n angad r not gonna change Or make any amends for sahiba. Btw, sahiba staying with angad will be short term, one more drama or new dhamaka will separate them again. This is the pattern of show.