Originally posted by: hellodona
I wouldn't say either of them have been there for each other emotionally but she doesn't actively try to antagonize him by standing with people who hate him.
The whole love story revolves around these two won't let each other die, kyunki kalesh machane keliye opposition team ko jinda rakhna padega.
But she never sided with Garry or Jasleen about Angad's character even after seeing Angad and Seerat in 500 odd situations.
The one time she went against him was in Simran track where imo it was valid, the kid was truly innocent, he who grew up with all wealth of Brars had no right to send his dad's biological kid away to an orphanage against his dads wishes , execution might be shoddy but intent wasn't wrong.
She said some stuff to Angad when she knew nothing about Rumi but she is shown apologizing for being wrong about him in her head even while she is in distress.
If Angad simply accused Sahiba of having ego, it would be alright. But he says the other woman is right about you, nearly hundred times (something he never told Seerat when Sahiba spoke back to her)
And not once has he recollected Sahiba's words or how he often dismissed Sahiba's concerns regarding Seerat eyeing him even when she proposed him , offered him ema and does 500 things regarding his bedroom.
If even once they showed him thinking of Sahiba's warnings about Seerat while Seerat is on her rants against Sahiba, I would expect any better but it is clear abhi tak unnhe kuchh samajh nahi aaya.
Still don't think it is his responsibility to rescue her from Rumi and I don't really get moved by this. We know he will sacrifice his life to save her (wouldn't he do same for Seerat or any family member). We also reasonably predict there is going to be 0 improvement in his ability to understand bhabiji.
Bold : Agreed