I am okay with seeing to through the lense of 17th century but I’m definitely not going to be okay with inconsistency of her character. Girl, decide if he loves you or you hate him. Decide if you feel a void without him or confirm that you wish to kill him the minute he is caught. Decide if you’re the same chandravanshis who used to brag about being justice lovers or you just want to hang him without even hearing his pleas. I have a problem with inconsistency. She could feel him when she was out to catch him but she couldn’t read the truth in his when we literally asked her to forgive herself for his death once the truth is revealed. I am not okay with her my way or Highway attitude.
Not justifying her character, but it's always about the lens you view it from- in the 21st century, it's almost impossible to imagine that your significant other could love you, but also have the motivation to kill your parent at the same time.
In the 17th century, where an eye for an eye is possible and socially acceptable (remember that the King offered the sword to Dhruv, who drew it before Ravi Baba's gasping diverted him), the thought process is different.
Tara clearly believes that
a) Dhruv loves her
b) Dhruv had enough motivation to kill her father, and her father's dying declaration is proof of it.
c) She loves Dhruv, but will pick duty for Vallabhgarh over love if asked to choose.
and she also believes that a, b and c can all be true at the same time.
isko ache se mota karna hai healthy banake iski body bani hai 
Indian Idol 16
Fan Fictions
0