General Discussion thread #1 - Page 79

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Definitely not in that way

There was no Sahdev Rekha in Mahabharata

.

This is what i thought....stupid idot box shows messing with people's minds😡

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

This is what i thought....stupid idot box shows messing with people's minds😡

Waise Valmiki Ramayana doesn't even has Lakshman rekha but that is there in other sources and in a flashback of Ram Charit Manas

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Waise Valmiki Ramayana doesn't even has Lakshman rekha but that is there in other sources and in a flashback of Ram Charit Manas

Yep Ravan just came in disguise and abducted her , no lakshman rekha....

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

Yep Ravan just came in disguise and abducted her , no lakshman rekha....

True. Lakshman just left after being repeatedly chided by Seeta. She said that he wants Ram to die so that he can have Seeta for himself....

And here today people come up with stories like Lakshman never saw Seeta's face

That's why I said long back. The original stories are beautiful but very brutal. The writers during Islamic Era made it simpler and more protagonist oriented. I guess to ensure that invaders don't use our scriptures to mock us since they had limited Sanskrit knowledge

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

True. Lakshman just left after being repeatedly chided by Seeta. She said that he wants Ram to die so that he can have Seeta for himself....

And here today people come up with stories like Lakshman never saw Seeta's face

That's why I said long back. The original stories are beautiful but very brutal. The writers during Islamic Era made it simpler and more protagonist oriented. I guess to ensure that invaders don't use our scriptures to mock us since they had limited Sanskrit knowledge

Yes Sita did accuse Lakshman of lusting for her and she wanted deer meat that's why she sent Ram after the deer....

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

True. Lakshman just left after being repeatedly chided by Seeta. She said that he wants Ram to die so that he can have Seeta for himself....

And here today people come up with stories like Lakshman never saw Seeta's face

That's why I said long back. The original stories are beautiful but very brutal. The writers during Islamic Era made it simpler and more protagonist oriented. I guess to ensure that invaders don't use our scriptures to mock us since they had limited Sanskrit knowledge

My mother said that whatever Sita said to Lakshman coz of that she had to go through so much pain in her life.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Valmiki Ramayana doesn't have Agni Pareeksha. After finding her back, Ram discards her and asks her to gp wherever she wants as he can't accept a woman like her.

Sita is sad at it and decides to suicide by Atmadah in Agni, but then she was so pure that Agni couldn't burn her and then Agni Dev come to Ram ji and testified for her.

And nowhere was a man considered impure that time, VR is clear that Ramji often spent time and enjoyed with Dasis(and we all know what would have happened in that time) even when Sita ji was with him.

It was only when he was in forest that he didn't have access

P.S. Seeta Agni Pareeksha is in Yudhh Kand not in Uttara Kand so this part isn't even interpolation. The Ramopakhyana in Mahabharata is all more demeaning

Bold; Such double standards in ancient times , kings can marry / make the queens of defeated kings as their dasis and here he's saying that he cannot be wirh a womna because she stayed at someone else's palace as a captive and allegedly had relations with him....then why did he even spend so much time to find Sita?

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

Bold; Such double standards in ancient times , kings can marry / make the queens of defeated kings as their dasis and here he's saying that he cannot be wirh a womna because she stayed at someone else's palace as a captive and allegedly had relations with him....then why did he even spend so much time to find Sita?

Can't even say what double standards was. Ram actually said that he can't believe that Ravan would have been able to resist himself after being with her for so long. It's such a double standard that multiple women in life is a status symbol and even 2 men in their lives make women characterless....(even if she thinks of another man)

@bold he answers that. By abducting his wife Ravan had put a blot on his power and family name, that the Ikshawaku Vanshis Can't even protect their women, now by defeating Ravan and freeing Seeta, he has cleansed his family name of that blot. He can't have such a women as his wife and it's better Sita goes to Bharat, Lakshman, Sugreev, Vibhishan or whomsoever she wishes to

Thing is though that Valmiki didn't support Ram's stance here. He mentions that Seeta didn't deserve to hear what she had to

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Can't even say what double standards was. Ram actually said that he can't believe that Ravan would have been able to resist himself after being with her for so long. It's such a double standard that multiple women in life is a status symbol and even 2 men in their lives make women characterless....(even if she thinks of another man)

@bold he answers that. By abducting his wife Ravan had put a blot on his power and family name, that the Ikshawaku Vanshis Can't even protect their women, now by defeating Ravan and freeing Seeta, he has cleansed his family name of that blot. He can't have such a women as his wife and it's better Sita goes to Bharat, Lakshman, Sugreev, Vibhishan or whomsoever she wishes to

Thing is though that Valmiki didn't support Ram's stance here. He mentions that Seeta didn't deserve to hear what she had to

Bold; Good that Valmiki didn't support Ram's stand in this....

Originally posted by: Palak2812

You guys are talking about dressing of historical characters

The og Gopi Bahu was replaced one of the reasons was her dressing and lifestyle be not like Gopi. & people were against it

ITV shows toxic and wrong stuffs, actors then suffer from viewers toxicity

Never even heard Gia being in news for modern un gopiesque dressing. 😆

@bold: True. Latest actor to join this club will be Avinash Mishra.