Anupama should not go to America. Period. - Page 2

Oh no,what about the Paisa they spent on Farewell😢

Originally posted by: Radhe001

Oh no,what about the Paisa they spent on Farewell😢

Originally posted by: Criticiser

Now Baaa will be engry and will demand the snakes back 😡

ok then here baa....

Originally posted by: Criticiser

It’s all gone down the drain now the Tamashahs will be broke and will blame AnupaMaaa for their poverty. Another Matka for Matke wali Maaa

No ..No they will make her work for lifetime maid .....hisaab barabar🤣

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Us jaana possible nahi

Shimla ke boarding school mein bhej sakte Hai

Ahmedabad mei ekicch bhi hostel nahi hai.

In regular circumstances no mother would leave their young child behind to follow their dreams. Most mothers even if they have a busy career take their kids along with them if the relocate.

But matters are complicated here. Maya made Anupamaa give up CA. Anuj left Anupamaa. She thought she was free and signed a contract.

The logical thing would be to go to US and take Anuj and CA with her.

But, this is ITV soooo.

Originally posted by: Potato_couch

If Anupama truly considers CA to be her daughter, she should prioritize being with her over everything else, including her own dreams. Once CA grows up, then Anupama (and all mothers) should value herself and her dreams the most. But when you give birth, or if you adopt a child, you are making an agreement to place the child above everyone and everything else for the next 18 years.

If Anupama chooses to separate herself from CA, then she should really stop her "Maa hoon ne" BS.

So is it fair to ask Anupama to not go for her job when the father of the child is present along with all other family members?

If the child still is finding it difficult without the mother, Anuj can figure a way of taking the kid to US to be with her mother atleast till things settle for the child.

This entire track is showing that women should not have ambitions at all if they have children…it’s a completely wrong message shown by the makers in today’s times. Women should be shown the opposite of this! A mother will continue being a good mother even if she pursues her career!!!

I would have loved to actually see her go to the US without any emotional baggage and actually show that people back home are supportive. Creating such drastic scenarios to make the decision impossible is lame to watch…instead u just don’t create a situation where she gets an opportunity….only to give it up every time. What a sad state for us viewers ya…complete waste of mindspace

If only the writers would think logically like this 👏

Originally posted by: U_nicorn

Imagine if it was Anuj who had a 3 year official work in US, he wouldn’t even be facing this dilemma right? He would have simply left for US and expected everyone else to handle their lives and support his decision.

So is it fair to ask Anupama to not go for her job when the father of the child is present along with all other family members?

If the child still is finding it difficult without the mother, Anuj can figure a way of taking the kid to US to be with her mother atleast till things settle for the child.

This entire track is showing that women should not have ambitions at all if they have children…it’s a completely wrong message shown by the makers in today’s times. Women should be shown the opposite of this! A mother will continue being a good mother even if she pursues her career!!!

I would have loved to actually see her go to the US without any emotional baggage and actually show that people back home are supportive. Creating such drastic scenarios to make the decision impossible is lame to watch…instead u just don’t create a situation where she gets an opportunity….only to give it up every time. What a sad state for us viewers ya…complete waste of mindspace

Originally posted by: Potato_couch

If Anupama truly considers CA to be her daughter, she should prioritize being with her over everything else, including her own dreams. Once CA grows up, then Anupama (and all mothers) should value herself and her dreams the most. But when you give birth, or if you adopt a child, you are making an agreement to place the child above everyone and everything else for the next 18 years.

If Anupama chooses to separate herself from CA, then she should really stop her "Maa hoon ne" BS.

Society says for a mother the child comes first and that’s true. A safe and correct environment for a child’s development comes first…not a mother’s sacrifice.

a mother being a person of her own, having her own mind, own hobbies and having her own dreams and as add on being financially independent is a complete change of perspective for children.

They learn how to respect others who have careers, they learn to do things on their own and they understand that they too can have ambitions if they want to.

If a mother is always shown to sacrifice and if that becomes a social norm, the daughter will also believe she has to sacrifice her dreams…and that’s not good for a society right!

Originally posted by: shwetha85

Yes obviously because a woman is only a mother but not a human being who could have dreams of her own.

I really really wish people had brought this point when she was neglecting her dreams for ADULT MARRIED children, lol

A 7 year old is a responsibility, most countries have laws against abandoning or neglecting children so young (if you have obviously adopted her of course,, dont know the status here). You cannot justify abandoning a 7 year old in the name of dreams otherwise the streets would be full of abandoned children as their parents run away for their dreams