Extremely cruel parenting : Mrs Sharma 😢😭💔 - Page 9

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

Point is CRUELTY. Ek chote bacche ko kaise guilt trip kiya gaya hai and kaise financial burden ke niche dabaya uski mamma ne that is the point of my post.

Mamma’s pain is nothing in front of the way mama choose most cruel way for small child.

exactly...point is CRUELITY....and the main cruelity is separating mamma from the baccha.....and the birlas r eagerly waiting for it....

There was other ways to explain to Abhir like rational adults. That drama wasn't necessary and extremely damaging. Like I said before for Akshara and Abhinav the ends justify the means. A child with a heart condition who is prone to hiding his problems from adults getting emotionally scarred for life doesn't matter lol.

Also, I missed a couple months of the leap, but was Abhir adopted by Abhinav? Did Abhi legally sign away his rights as a father? I thought he didn't know about Abhir's existence until a few months ago. I don't understand why the characters are acting Abhi stole Abhir from them. It's actually the opposite. Sharma's removed his son from his life and Goenkas tried to help her continue her cruelty. Makers are throwing everything and it's getting any response. The TRPs are still stagnant.

Lo bhai, damned if you do and damned if you don't. How were they supposed to make the small child leave them when he was not listening to any other reason?

I don’t know why we are resorting back to comparisons between what happened with Akshara and Abhir and trying to justify her behavior through that. You can’t hurt your child because the world once hurt you.

Thing is, Abhimanyu has taken Akshara’s place in the name of empathy. The way he is approaching this is so much more mature. Rather than playing blame games and hurting an innocent soul.

Yes, the custody verdict was cruel. No one should have to separate from their mother. But it’s not like Abhir is going to some stranger’s house who he knows nothing about. He knows Docman, he loves Docman. Again, it’s ridiculous that the court would want this transition to happen within a single day. But it is what it is and we cannot blame Abhimanyu for the decision.

Honestly, them revealing the entire truth to Abhir rather than this ridiculous reason, which hurt the poor child and made him think of himself as a burden on his parents, would have been better! Abhimanyu would be okay to take all the blame. But he would also be okay to explain things to Abhir the way a child would understand.

exactly...point is CRUELITY....and the main cruelity is separating mamma from the baccha.....and the birlas r eagerly waiting for it....

[/Quote]

Khud kulhadi ko paas gaye, khud kulhadi par pair rakha hai so they are in no position to called others cruel.

Agar sach mai pehle se he 1% ka self-doubt kiya hota ki agar hum solo custody haar gaye toh court ke orders follow karne Bahot difficult hoge.
Solo custody ki lalach le dubi inko isiliye yeh log court gaye the na. Socha yeh tha ki solo custody Jeet gaye toh abhimanyu and uske naam ko bacche ki identity se hamesha ke liye easily discard kar dege. Condition bhi isi lalach ke hisab se rakkha tha ki agar case jite toh abhir ko kabhi disclose nahi karege ki who is his real father.

Lekin court ne sab ulta kar diya, sirf solo custody he nahi diya, birth certificate jhol ko bhi reverse karne ka order de diya court ne.

Not Birlas , it’s Akshara and her dadaji’s personal choice to fight for solo custody to get rid of Abhimanyu and his name from abhir’s identity. Akshara also accepted her dadaji’s choice by calling it her destiny etc.
Ab yeh scene aa gaya hai ki khud toh solo custody ki lalach mai 1% ka bhi self doubt karna bhul gaye so ab Abhimanyu se expect kar rahe hai ki tum case jeet kar baccha give up karo because hum toh solo custody and tumhare naam ko abhir ki identity se discard karne ki lalach mai 1% self doubt karna bhi bhul gaye.

Originally posted by: dotheDrama

I don’t know why we are resorting back to comparisons between what happened with Akshara and Abhir and trying to justify her behavior through that. You can’t hurt your child because the world once hurt you.

Thing is, Abhimanyu has taken Akshara’s place in the name of empathy. The way he is approaching this is so much more mature. Rather than playing blame games and hurting an innocent soul.

Yes, the custody verdict was cruel. No one should have to separate from their mother. But it’s not like Abhir is going to some stranger’s house who he knows nothing about. He knows Docman, he loves Docman. Again, it’s ridiculous that the court would want this transition to happen within a single day. But it is what it is and we cannot blame Abhimanyu for the decision.

Honestly, them revealing the entire truth to Abhir rather than this ridiculous reason, which hurt the poor child and made him think of himself as a burden on his parents, would have been better! Abhimanyu would be okay to take all the blame. But he would also be okay to explain things to Abhir the way a child would understand.

@bold: THIS exactly. It is remarkable that people are justifying a mother doing such harmful things to her child in the name of "Oh the world was cruel to her one time so she is justified in being cruel to her child" 😕😆

The mental gymnastics going on here to justify the unjustifiable....amazing😆

Originally posted by: AreYaar

@bold: THIS exactly. It is remarkable that people are justifying a mother doing such harmful things to her child in the name of "Oh the world was cruel to her one time so she is justified in being cruel to her child" 😕😆

The mental gymnastics going on here to justify the unjustifiable....amazing😆

Ignore such background noises and stick to the topic in the comments is all we can do.

Originally posted by: yellomellow

There was other ways to explain to Abhir like rational adults. That drama wasn't necessary and extremely damaging. Like I said before for Akshara and Abhinav the ends justify the means. A child with a heart condition who is prone to hiding his problems from adults getting emotionally scarred for life doesn't matter lol.

Also, I missed a couple months of the leap, but was Abhir adopted by Abhinav? Did Abhi legally sign away his rights as a father? I thought he didn't know about Abhir's existence until a few months ago. I don't understand why the characters are acting Abhi stole Abhir from them. It's actually the opposite. Sharma's removed his son from his life and Goenkas tried to help her continue her cruelty. Makers are throwing everything and it's getting any response. The TRPs are still stagnant.

No, Abhinav never formally adopted Abhir. It seems Sharmas thought it was enough that Akshara put his name on the birth certificate arbitrarily and married him....apparently that automatically made him Abhir's father as per the wannabe law student Mrs. Sharma😆

Btw the name Sharma is also made up....lol makers shifted the narrative right after the leap to suddenly give a last name to Abhinav....before that he had no last name😆

Makers can keep trying as hard as they want....the difference in Abhimanyu's parenting where he has handled difficult transitions for the kids by explaining nicely to them v/s the Sharmas who can only think up ideas that involve lying....lol the audience can see this difference clearly enough despite attempts to twist narratives.

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

Yeh same white day wala side track mere every post ke background mai bajta rehta hai 😆 😆😆

Ignore such background noises and stick to the topic in the comments is all we can do.

Yeh white day ka tape recorder kabka baj bajke ghiss bhi chuka hai.....sounds like a phata hua dhol now but phir bhi log bajaate rehte hain😆

Jis baat ka koi correlation hi nahin with why Akshara is NOW trying to make her kid feel like an unwanted burden....lol aise zabardasti se correlation nikaalne se valid nahin ho jaayega.

Makers should've went with something other than law. It was an odd choice considering how they struggled with showing her as musical therapist. Best of luck to them.

@bold Wow, ITV is crazy. Her living with a stranger she knew nothing about during a high-risk pregnancy was crazy, but it turns out he never had a surname either. That makes her whole "Sharma family" chants look even more ridiculous now lol.

To me, Abhi was always more understanding and gentler. It started with Shivu in the first leap. He actively engages with the children, which is rare for ITV. None of the adults on the show actually talk the children, they talk at them.

Makers are perpetually confused about what to do. Viewers watch Abhi being kind and understanding, but the characters in Goenka house act like he is a monster lol. Everything they accuse him of they are the culprits. One minute is he is the enemy then the next he is someone who will understand their pain and suffer in their stead. He is written like the female lead viewers are waiting to see if he ever gets justice or if his sacrifices are acknowledged lol.

Originally posted by: AreYaar

No, Abhinav never formally adopted Abhir. It seems Sharmas thought it was enough that Akshara put his name on the birth certificate arbitrarily and married him....apparently that automatically made him Abhir's father as per the wannabe law student Mrs. Sharma😆

Btw the name Sharma is also made up....lol makers shifted the narrative right after the leap to suddenly give a last name to Abhinav....before that he had no last name😆

Makers can keep trying as hard as they want....the difference in Abhimanyu's parenting where he has handled difficult transitions for the kids by explaining nicely to them v/s the Sharmas who can only think up ideas that involve lying....lol the audience can see this difference clearly enough despite attempts to twist narratives.