Raj Mehta has directed Good Newwz and Jugjugg Jeeyo.
In both movies, it looks like he's trying to make the stories modern and progressive. When they're actually not. He still promotes regressive ideas in his films.
He plays it safe by ending these movies in a typical way, where all the characters are happy, glossing over their issues.
Like in Good Newwz, the story looks down on abortion and adoption. When the doctor guilts Kareena's character for aborting her child even if its someone elses child and not her husband's. Or when Kiara says she didn't adopt even after having a miscarriage two times, because "apna khoon apna hota hain".
Akshay's character is shown as a villain for not wanting a child. The movie had a scene of Akshay and Kareena where they he tells about the benefits of not having a child. Its a good scene but there's no sense to it, because it has no follow-up. Movie is not promoting childless marriages then what was the point of this scene?
In Jugjug Jeeyo, the director could've showed divorce as a positive and healthy thing. By at least one couple ending their marriage. But it didn't happen. Varun's character got over his insecurity from the success of his wife, which was fine. But Neetu's character should have left her useless cheating husband. I know they left it ambigous by not telling whether Anil and Neetu end up divorcing or not.
That was again playing it safe by not just showing them divorving. And the way Neetu's character was written, its likely that she would have forgiven her husband for messing up the nth time.
Good Newwz left the issue of mixed-up babies unresolved. So the fathers will just have to stay away from their biological kids? It needs a sequel which likely would never get made. That makes the movie look incomplete because that issue is unresolved.
3