GHKPM WU & daily discussion thread #115 - Page 75

Third angle ki zaroori hai nd conflict in SaiRatReunion ki zaroori hai for drama nd to increase the episodes

Third angle ko negative ya villain hona zaroori nai hai hamesha😊they need just to be a conflict nd obstacle as former one, as according to makers post leap patralekha was just damsel in distress, victim nd was so positive nd never did any wrong or crime,nd to top everything FL herself gave certificate of good mother to her son😌

Originally posted by: sas79

Pakhi seems to be the new Samrat of the story. I think soon, Vinu will leave to be with SaiYa and Savi since he hates V and the Chavans for driving away his mother.

I don't get V at all. What was he expecting when he asked P for a divorce? That she would stay behind in CN even after? Even if he reunited with Sai, he would have faced this issue, except that Vinu would have hated Sai and V. Sai saw this and decided to stay away and eventually, seeing V's obsession, marry Satya.

Kuch nahi atleast if Sai agreed she would have taken all the hurt and anger from Vinu and he need not have been blamed to this extent, family would have blamed both of them, he would have too, telling Sai that they could have waited to convince Vinu by playing pati to Pakhi for few more days..wo sambhal leta hai then also would have got good sex after dealing with so much dukh dard peeda.

Abhi pura blame bhi khud par gaya..Sai is loved..Pakhi is loved, he is hates while no action also in ye bedroom..

Just because Sai doesnt create a scene every time or sometimes tolerates things for manifold reasons or gets gaslighted into assuming blame of being a bad parent and assuming accountability for everything going wrong in everyone's lives or saying P was a good maa because she managed to make a place in Vinu;s heart etc etc, does not mean its all true. The excuse that she herself said this, did this , etc etc doesnt hold water in terms of the actual facts of the matter. Sai has many majbooris and issues. Thats why she cant launch a full offensive on V, P or CN losers

Originally posted by: Sherry24

I was here for Sai. I followed the it all throughout for the one character that they kept intact. I agree when u said that she doesn’t let anyone bind her. But here she did. She got carried away by P and Ashwini’s words. It was again her character to take offence and retaliate when V CAed her. As a woman of self respect she out to give it back and show him his place. But running into a marriage only to stop someone from chasing her was stupid. Marriage is not a joke. Just because she had a deal marriage once she decided to go for another.
But most importantly she did this to appease herself. To put V down defeat him. The soul talk before the wedding clearly says she was marrying because of V’s words. It was not about Vinu. She never thought about the kids. Savi adjusted. What if she didn’t? She clearly didn’t prioritise her. It was an impulsive decision taken only because she wanted to prove V wrong and punish V for his words. This is where her character was compromised. This is not the Sai who would fight for her stand.

Sai decision to get married was because she didn’t wanted to be chased by Virat...

She getting married to satya was because of Virat's words and it's ok if it was not because of vinu indirectly it was so she doesn't have to go far...

And as I said sai character doesn't see rules she does what she thinks is right at that moment and she had been very clear that she had nothing to do with virat and if for chasing him away she had to get another man in her life she was up for that too.

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Again, the father decided to draft up divorce papers without so much as having a discussion with the wife let alone the child, then proceeded to sexually harass his ex and publicly humiliate the said wife by publicly proposing his ex and you're asking why Patralekha did not stay back to prove that she's a good mother? Sai is bad mother because she broke Savi's dream family, Pakhi is a bad mother because she did not stay back as the resident mistress-cum-badi ma, but Virat is a great father because he put his son through a traumatising event just to slake his lust love for his ex? And I don't even mean Pakhi leaving Vinu, but actively harassing, locking, manhandling a woman in front of Vinu and then pushing and hurting his mother lol.

Pakhi is a selfish parent, like a lot of parents are. But she prioritised Vinu's best interest till it was plausible and practically possible for her lol. Thappad khaaye hain Virat ne Pakhi ke haathon Vinu ke liye

This !! 👏

I don't even care about Sairat or SaiYa (at this point) till Sai is emotionally done with Virat.

But Virat being called a great father who has done nothing as a father for them since leap, while the two women who tried to even deal with his other for the sake of their children, despite him disrespecting them multiple multiple multiple times are bad mothers.. alag kahani ..

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Again, the father decided to draft up divorce papers without so much as having a discussion with the wife let alone the child, then proceeded to sexually harass his ex and publicly humiliate the said wife by publicly proposing his ex and you're asking why Patralekha did not stay back to prove that she's a good mother? Sai is bad mother because she broke Savi's dream family, Pakhi is a bad mother because she did not stay back as the resident mistress-cum-badi ma, but Virat is a great father because he put his son through a traumatising event just to slake his lust love for his ex? And I don't even mean Pakhi leaving Vinu, but actively harassing, locking, manhandling a woman in front of Vinu and then pushing and hurting his mother lol.

Pakhi is a selfish parent, like a lot of parents are. But she prioritised Vinu's best interest till it was plausible and practically possible for her lol. Thappad khaaye hain Virat ne Pakhi ke haathon Vinu ke liye

This !! 👏

I don't even care about Sairat or SaiYa (at this point) till Sai is emotionally done with Virat.

But Virat being called a great father who has done nothing as a father for them since leap, while the two women who tried to even deal with his other for the sake of their children, despite him disrespecting them multiple multiple multiple times are bad mothers.. alag kahani ..

Sai is a bad parent to both her kids (she raised her daughter alone, by the way), doesn't deserve to be in touch with the mighty Chavannis and V, even after they stole her Vinu but V and Chavannis can gatecrash Adhikaris everytime because well baap ki baapta... The same baap who is hailed as the greatest father India jisne kabhi apni kabiliyat par ghamand nahi kiya to take care of both the kids and focus on his job but needs ex wife who is not yet ex wife as nanny to his kid because well vaise to vo sab kuch akele kar sakta hai par he needs to give jeene ka maksad to his ex bhabhi turned bhabiwi who is not his ex wife yet, though he only wanted to give her divorce but didn't want her to leave and play mistress mistress with ex wife, current wife ..ab i am only confused about ex and current wife and bhabhi.

Originally posted by: asmi_ekaa

This !! 👏

I don't even care about Sairat or SaiYa (at this point) till Sai is emotionally done with Virat.

But Virat being called a great father who has done nothing as a father for them since leap, while the two women who tried to even deal with his other for the sake of their children, despite him disrespecting them multiple multiple multiple times are bad mothers.. alag kahani ..

Sai ne kaha na choro ko saare chor hi nazar aate h same goes with Virat... he himself doesn't cared for his kid and pushed bost sai and pakhi and when both of them have moved on from him they are bad mothers...

Sai is a good mother she sees what is good for her kids if vinu is happy with pakhi let him be with her she herself is happy with savi. She never said Virat a bad father...

This is strictly my POV, if you don’t like it please refrain yourself from commenting. When Ghum started channel and makers promoted only Virakhi but it didn’t clicked with the audience and then focus moved to Sai’s character and then gradually they started building Sairat but pakhi was always a conflict between them and eventually they had to take a leap to revive Virakhi and this time it worked for them, not as popular couple but for the drama. People lost connect with Sairat long back, usually ITv seperation tracks don’t last for more than 4-5 months but in ghum it’s almost a year now it’s in top 2 shows and audience are ok with Virakhi as couple. In some cases even if separation track is on fiction couple hype remains same so that buzz is around the show but Sairat buzz got over soon after Shruti’s track you won’t see their name in trends, polls and ITV popular ships ranking list so it’s easy for makers to mould the story, now with Saiya the case is different, they didn’t create much hype around but social media did all for Saiya, just in one month Saiya surpassed Sairat ship and people shown acceptance towards it. Channel determines hype of characters through both medium Social and TRP, right now both works in Saiya favours. Also, if Sairat happens to be end game their next gen plot will not have much drama so i feel they will stick with Saiya now that’s why they have mentioned love starts blooming rest all is TRp game. Btw In old kasauti prerna never gone back to anurag and was always known as Mrs. Bajaj so ship really doesn’t matter for the TRP audience.

Random question, but why did they change the set for Satya house again ? Anyone know? Not sure if someone asked already, not caught up on the threads yet.