GHKPM WU & daily discussion thread #115 - Page 72

Originally posted by: Deltablues

As things stand right now, it seems as if the hero did not pay much heed to the soon-to-be-former-ex-wife's consent, had no contingency plan if she said (gasps) no; other than pressurising her, and had no qualms about letting the women deal with the disruption in his son's life.

He has no regard for the soon-to-be-but-not-yet ex wife's consent either and wants her to come back to him as his convinience. Invading her right to privacy while doing so AFTER she did what he had initially demanded of her.

HERO OF THE CENTURY👏

Originally posted by: NaughtyCodes7

The beauty of sai's character is that she doesn't anyone bind her by rules. She knows her priorities and she can go to any length for them.

Before marrying satya she made it clear to him and his family that her children are her priority. Also she was very clear to satya that she is only marrying him to stop Virat from coming after her. Things turn ugly between Virat and sai because virat is being adamant and not letting things go... their relation was over the moment he chose pakhi over sai yet sai is trying to be cordial with him because she doesn't want her kids to think there is some major problem between them she doesn't want to spoil their childhood because of the problem of adults.

I was here for Sai. I followed the it all throughout for the one character that they kept intact. I agree when u said that she doesn’t let anyone bind her. But here she did. She got carried away by P and Ashwini’s words. It was again her character to take offence and retaliate when V CAed her. As a woman of self respect she out to give it back and show him his place. But running into a marriage only to stop someone from chasing her was stupid. Marriage is not a joke. Just because she had a deal marriage once she decided to go for another.
But most importantly she did this to appease herself. To put V down defeat him. The soul talk before the wedding clearly says she was marrying because of V’s words. It was not about Vinu. She never thought about the kids. Savi adjusted. What if she didn’t? She clearly didn’t prioritise her. It was an impulsive decision taken only because she wanted to prove V wrong and punish V for his words. This is where her character was compromised. This is not the Sai who would fight for her stand.

Originally posted by: LadyD

I thought personal attacks were not allowed?

Btw a question isn’t comments about height come under body shaming which are done a lot in this forum?

it’s individual view point. What I see you don’t see & what you see I don’t.

Looks acting are all subjective.

Do you even think before what you type or you just wanna play report report or can't comprehend properly! Where did I make personal comment? I just wrote about Bhatt ka acting.

Originally posted by: Cold-Fire

There's no use of explaining these critical things to immature brains. Let us just enjoy any scene that's relevant to us, till the PH decides to flip/destroy the characters.

The way I see current track is Satya @ day 2 of wedding & Virat at that time are similar. Virat saved Sai from Jagtap twice. Was caring about her well-being when she was in safe house, post her father’s death. Was upfront about his situation while marrying her. Asked her mawshi to accompany her so that she doesn’t feel lonely in unfamiliar situation, was prompt in protecting her when break was applied suddenly, told his mom to make sure she is fed as she hadn’t had anything to eat for a while.

The only difference is Sai didn’t have much choice & time to know him & his family situation better before getting married & there was no kid involved.

Now she is independent self sufficient woman with child making life long commitment & could have asked for more time to get to know the family & ease the child into that situation. Esp after her bad experience with her first marriage.

May be her decision would have been same. May be family including Amba too would have gotten to know her better & would have liked her over time.

But this time there was no need for rushing into things. She had law & commissioner on her side to stop Virat.

Originally posted by: LadyD

I thought personal attacks were not allowed?

Btw a question isn’t comments about height come under body shaming which are done a lot in this forum?

it’s individual view point. What I see you don’t see & what you see I don’t.

Looks acting are all subjective.

How is her post a personal attack? Her dislike for his acting performance and not finding any nuance is not a personal attack on either the actor or his admirers because acting is not a personality trait or an inalienable feature of a person.

At this point, a lot of it actually seems like targeted bullying of mystic because literally everything she says is taken to be a 'personal attack' on this forum. Her post was random and had very inferential context (every actor uses glycerin lol) and yet it has been termed as a personal attack on god knows whom.

Also, Neil is not a drawf, there are no social stigma against his height. He comes from a very privileged background and is getting well paid to do his job. People use just about any term on this platform without context.

If at all, anyone is discussing his height, it is because he plays a fictional cop who randomly tries to beat up a fictional civilian nearly half-a-foot taller than him. Within the context of this fictional universe, it might look funny to some. This is a visual medium lol. Was mystic even discussing his height?

Lol

Sai should've gifted Vinayak something related to him being doctor why this gold chain when the boy is a chavan & treated as the golden boy of this generation.

Originally posted by: mysticriver

Do you even think before what you type or you just wanna play report report or can't comprehend properly! Where did I make personal comment? I just wrote about Bhatt ka acting.

I was asking question because I too want to have opinion about someone’s expression & acting. Wasn’t sure if such negative comment is allowed?

Originally posted by: LadyD

I was asking question because I too want to have opinion about someone’s expression & acting. Wasn’t sure if such negative comment is allowed?

People here have said worst possible comments on ASB. Literally she was trolled under the garb of Pakhi 😭

What's your point? What was so negative in my comment? Zabardasti issue create karna hai toh I'm not interested right now and no energy left either as I'm about to go to sleep. You can carry on all alone!

Originally posted by: Deltablues

How is her post a personal attack? Her dislike for his acting performance and not finding any nuance is not a personal attack on either the actor or his admirers because acting is not a personality trait or an inalienable feature of a person.

At this point, a lot of it actually seems like targeted bullying of mystic because literally everything she says is taken to be a 'personal attack' on this forum. Her post was random and had very inferential context (every actor uses glycerin lol) and yet it has been termed as a personal attack on god knows whom.

Also, Neil is not a drawf, there are no social stigma against his height. He comes from a very privileged background and is getting well paid to do his job. People use just about any term on this platform without context.

If at all, anyone is discussing his height, it is because he plays a fictional cop who randomly tries to beat up a fictional civilian nearly half-a-foot taller than him. Within the context of this fictional universe, it might look funny to some. This is a visual medium lol. Was mystic even discussing his height?

Lol

Shall I complain to mods & tag here how I'm being cyber bullied? 😭🤣

Originally posted by: mysticriver

Which scenes