Katha Ankahee -- #11 daily episode DT - Page 107

Originally posted by: kushikumari

If Katha was not part of the committee, she would be sitting on the other side, being interviewed. That would not help Viaan’s case at all!

That outburst might actually be another imagination. Who knows, she might be terrified that she will end up asking that question and letting the cat out of the bag. Probably something that keeps her up at night. let’s see!

Originally posted by: Twinklestar139

@bold - i was thinking about this alternative and if she was on the other side I definitely think she would have twisted her answers so as to not reveal whatever that happened between them. if she would reveal the details about that incident upon being questioned, she would also have to reveal that she accepted the offer and i don’t think she would want that. other than that incident, she doesn’t have anything negative to say about Viaan so it probably wouldn’t have hurt his case much. for that same reason i doubt that she will ask Viaan such a direct question as shown in the promo because i don’t think she has forgotten she was a part of that ONS as well so it might just be someone’s imagination.

Hmmm, she can't pick up the chai he made for her and then scream the one ill-thought question at him (big eyes and all), can she? That will make her a nut case. She can't be on the other side of the table either, that would be more stressful. Imagine being asked directly if she ever received such a message or knows of anyone receiving such a message. So, yes all is good then!

@ bold, yup! All that prior righteous attitude was quite unnecessary. On the other hand, if she can portray being totally ok with what happened, without blaming herself or Viaan, then that I would cheer.🥳

Having said that, I am totally fine with Viaan going through guilty pangs. Not a fan of such offers.

Originally posted by: kushikumari

Hmmm, she can't pick up the chai he made for her and then scream the one ill-thought question at him (big eyes and all), can she? That will make her a nut case. She can't be on the other side of the table either, that would be more stressful. Imagine being asked directly if she ever received such a message or knows of anyone receiving such a message. So, yes all is good then!

@ bold, yup! All that prior righteous attitude was quite unnecessary. On the other hand, if she can portray being totally ok with what happened, without blaming herself or Viaan, then that I would cheer.🥳

Having said that, I am totally fine with Viaan going through guilty pangs. Not a fan of such offers.

Honestly when I mention she should not be on this side of table I am not concerned about what situation that will put Vian into and same goes for Katha

I am just talking about what is unfair of a trial it is.

A jury member cant and should not be emotionally weak like her to get triggered by whatever was being said.

If she was on other side of table she would have to reveal about her experience, it would have been tough for her with people judging her and all but isn't it the scenario the people indulge in #Metoo go through .

Originally posted by: amrapali2

Here's what I think about Katha not being neutral in this whole situation: SHE SHOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED THE OFFER OF BEING ON THE COMMITTEE IN THE FIRST PLACE!! (Sorry for screaming through the Caps Lock 😂 )

I get it that everyone thinks Katha would have no personal agenda; they cannot even imagine of Katha dn Viaan having had the physical relationship that they had. However, SHE KNOWS!! She knows that Viaan and her have an active history. Moreover, this history is not a pleasant one for her. She knows that investigating this case would enable her to relive her traumas, and worse, inflict her biasses onto this case. And this case is not a joke; it's an extremely serious case of harassment. If Katha was truly sensible, she should have rejected the offer. This is my opinion.

And if she indeed does take the case, it's her utmost responsibility to try her best to not bring her ONS into consideration. But clearly she does not do that. And it's damn irritating to see that.

She should not have taken the offer to preside the committee. It was simplest thing to do.

But then we would have not known what exactly going through her mind, what she feels, where she stands. There wouldn't have been a enough space to accomodate her feelings as outsider. But here, being a committee member, moreover being the presiding officer, we will have enough moments of her dilemma, thats what makers want to show.

Katha's almost jet speed recovery from ONS she claimed to have hated and considered as "sin" was very unrealistic and I always used to wonder if she has really left it behind the how they gonna incorporate the idea of ONS creating problems for them in future.

But here it is, katha says she has moved past but clearly in her subconscious mind she is still stuck there. She nurtures the feelings of hatred, disgust and anger associated with it and this case has given her and us a chance to know about it and how deep those feelings runs in her mind.

Yes she is hypocritical to bring out ONS in current investigation. But I don't blame her because doesn't matter she claims to be God like mahaan but she is a human after all. This whole track was supposed to bring out the unsaid, unsettled feelings of both katha and viaan before viaan could have confessed his love and I am glad it happened like this.

We all were feeling love confession is but too early and it was, that's why they didn't let it happen. I like this indian version a lot better than original because it has those sensibilities, connection and no character is tone deaf to only behave as per current scenario based on its flaws. Unlike there, here is real character development.

I would have appreciated it a lot more if they would continue to give us glimpses of katha's feelings throughout the case like through her monologues or introspection but till now we are only seeing her expressions and making our guesses. I think they will give a good kaviaan conversation after the case, I am really hoping otherwise it would feel incomplete.

Originally posted by: Ssp123

Honestly when I mention she should not be on this side of table I am not concerned about what situation that will put Vian into and same goes for Katha

I am just talking about what is unfair of a trial it is.

A jury member cant and should not be emotionally weak like her to get triggered by whatever was being said.

If she was on other side of table she would have to reveal about her experience, it would have been tough for her with people judging her and all but isn't it the scenario the people indulge in #Metoo go through .

I get what are you saying but probably because of this reason only she was hesitant for taking up that role. It should have been viaan to ask her opt out of it but he in fact encouraged her to take the offer.

Katha says she has moved passed ONS. Viaan says he has been forgiven. But actually both are still stuck there. For katha, its like replay of those circumstances and struggling through her own dilemmas she wants to navigate through this. For viaan its like finally karma getting him where he was supposed to be and thats why he wants katha to be his judge and he will gladly accept even if she adjudged him guilty. Its coming from his mindset that a person whom he wronged now gets to decide whether he is worth forgiving at all or not....as in poetic justice n all.

Its very crucial point for kaviaan. Lonavla conversation was just starting. It has put them in talking terms but what storm lays deep in their hearts will be uncovered during this track. So as much as I want the pace to be fast but I kind of understand why makers are taking time.

As viaan said in yesterday's episode, "ye hamare liye hai".

They need to go through it to come out it.

I just watched the clip with Viaan being interrogated and my god why did Katha have so much angst on her face when Viaan was being questioned?!! I understand that this whole investigation might be reminding her of the ONS but it makes no sense for her to show angst in her expressions as if Viaan played her or she was a victim when she clearly accepted that offer herself. She really does show selective righteousness and it's kind of irritating.

Originally posted by: mango.falooda

am not sure how I feel -- mixed feelings.

I think they had a good start..... and then dropped the ball.

I am still cheesed off by the stupid wardrobe -- it sounds minor but it drives me nuts. I get the arch aesthetics they were trying to convey and I feel the wardrobe needed to be aligned with those themes to be a good match -- have posted in arch thread an example.

I still feel the lack of high wire emotion is a problem; they seem to not want to be EK show which is fine but there is a reason EK shows do well. we like high drama and we enjoy it. being so muted and subtle on emotional scenes is strange and just makes viewers fall asleep. it also doesn't translate because the wounds are deep and that lends to high wire emotions -- no one is muted and subtle in such scenarios. there is a reason we have the saying -- "roar like a wounded animal".

I feel that these are not small quibbles but reflects in the forum as well which has been immensely quieter these last few weeks. we are still in the same DT!!!! previously we would zip through a DT in less than week at times. thats how much we chatted. so yea, it is nice they got award but not good if they don't improve on these flaws.

After very long time through this show itv has brought back those good old days where there was no EK to ruin it forever.

EK has ruled itv now more than a decade or two. It had affected the whole generation's mind set, changed the way of thinking and what to expect from an itv show.

Probably 80 percent of people today wont even remember or know about gems of itv shows like astitva, kora kagaz, saans, shanti, chhoti si aasha etc. These were 90's and early 2000's gems and KA remind me of that era. Those shows were slow to medium paced and captured the vulnerability of characters so well that you used to feel for them like they are your own family members. In fact this emotion continued till early EK era thats why when Mihir died in kyunki people bombarded EK's office to bring him back. That was a time when there was no social media. Just think people took trouble to write letters. Can you imagine this kind of madness in today's times.

I have no problem in high voltage drama but then itv dont have that intelligence to balance it with logic and sensitive tracks. For sake of drama they will show us saas bahu kitchen politics all the time, two sisters fighting for one man, career oriented FL turning into bade ghar ki bahu then just contented being bahurani, bahu's turning into makhhi, nagin, dayan, chudail and what not, forced marriage or contract marriage, EMA etc.

So I would rather prefer a show like KA instead of those so called live wire shows which has zero logic and just contribute to my increasing bp and anger issues.😆

Its just my opinion, I know people will any day watch EK or Rajan Shahi drama over Katha's dull episode.

But I feel like shows like KA should be encouraged. We put up with lots of shit EK and other shows throw at us and still continue watching them. See the top three forums, they are full of negative comments and posts and still people wont stop watching them. so I guess I can bear a little for KA before giving up on it.

I remember all these shows 😍

I really liked chhoti si AAsha ,could not watch the last episode tabhi to internet pe bhi nhi dekhte the i dont even know what was the ending .what happened with Sarda and Adhikari😥

Originally posted by: Ssp123

Honestly when I mention she should not be on this side of table I am not concerned about what situation that will put Vian into and same goes for Katha

I am just talking about what is unfair of a trial it is.

A jury member cant and should not be emotionally weak like her to get triggered by whatever was being said.

If she was on other side of table she would have to reveal about her experience, it would have been tough for her with people judging her and all but isn't it the scenario the people indulge in #Metoo go through .

In all the #Metoo scenario, woman mentioned they denied offer. No woman will say she accepted offer and claim #Metoo

Originally posted by: kushikumari

Agree with you, she should return the money first! Tired of the “who is he” expression and saying it loud as well. He is the same man who helped save her son’s life! She got what she wanted and was ok about how she was going to get the money……

He didn't help to save her son's life. He paid for ONS without knowing.

Katha sold her marriage ring, did the shopkeeper also helped her. NO.