Katha Ankahee -- #daily episode discussion thread - Page 114

Originally posted by: DelusionsOfNeha

Waise ye ONS hua ki nahi??🤣

Yes as per itv standard😆
And hello here

Well not episode related

But i watched both aditi and adnan interview together

They both r good speaker

Kind of marched each other vibes

Originally posted by: HahaHeheHuhu9

@ bold:

Different people are entitled to have different opinions on the same things in life.

Some of us think it is the other person who isn't able to appreciate a different point of view. It's better to agree to disagree here, than to ask "how difficult it is to understand?"

But quoting a phrase from the above bold sentence, "a person chooses to torture themselves". There's clearly a choice here. For many of us, a choice indicates that the person who actively takes charge and does anything cannot be labeled a victim.

Originally posted by: HahaHeheHuhu9

There's no blackmail here, and she does have other choices as others here pointed out. The crowd sourcing. Her mother in law. The rival company's offer. Asking Ehsan.

But she chose this option after thinking through everything. In your opinion, the choice she actively and purposefully made for herself is equivalent to torture. If so, then it would have been better if she had accepted the rival company's offer right? She did not, and that's another choice she made for herself.

She's not forcing herself - she's clearly doing this out of her own volition, though uncomfortable initially. I don't think Katha sees this as torture or majburi or as if she's a bechari. She's just saving her son by making a decision. That's all.

Originally posted by: Ssp123

Ok i was wrong about the precap i thought they are trying to state ONS k liye responsible bas Katha h.

That was not the case

Acc to me both are wrong here just like pride and Prejudice

,Vian never asked her the reason and didn't even think she has some emergency situation and similarly Katha did not tell him the reason .well she could have if she can go for crowdsourcing reason she could have stated the reason to him as well

But the issue is if you try to defend one the other person you are blaming automatically

And no point in comparing who was victim here.

i get what you are saying but I have seen several shows like this and been disappointed in the past. What he says as a character to justify himself is often what ends up becoming the makers viewpoint too...they often go down the route of whitewashing such characters and making it seem like despite such behavior, he has valid reasons- he is just misunderstood and misguided but he has heart of gold etc etc...I am just wary of all this after being disappointed by a bunch of ITV shows, If he is made to pay for this behavior then great but will it really happen? Will a character actually be shown being accountable for their actions....

Originally posted by: Jazzkapur

yes I'm blaming Viaan partially becoz just to TEST an innocent looking woman, u have no right to talk obscene things with her. Now u will say that Katha accepted this offer. N I'll say b4 accepting this offer, there was no hint from katha that she is interested in him. If a person asks 1 crore loan from u, a sane person will ask 'what? Why do u need such a big loan?' Or 'no i won't give u such a big loan' who says 'ok i'll give but u will have to spend a night with me?' when Viaan refused she clearly said 'forget that i asked loan from u' she was leaving the office chup chap. What thing made Viaan think that she is gold digger? N I'm talking about BEFORE accepting the offer situation.

Viann is guilty of sexual harassment and should be punished. But Katha also had other choices- they may not have materialized but she didnt exhaust them all before the ONS. She felt desperate and cornered but she made this choice and will now have to live with the consequences. Between the two Viaan is the worse offender since he misused his position/power but Katha also had the option of just being truthful or trying a few other things before ONS

Originally posted by: 07RB

Yes as per itv standard😆
And hello here

Hewwoooo

Originally posted by: Jazzkapur

again. Katha's both choices will torture her. So she have to choose less torture. She doesn't have the choice of NOT being tortured. So how can she choose no torture? For example if someone put ONLY 2 choices in front of u that either u slap urself or cut ur hand. Then obviously u will choose less torture. So do u mean that u r NOT victim? Anyways. Let's agree to disagree

She had other choices such as asking Ehsan, going to her mother in law, going ahead with crowd funding, telling Viaan the truth, and accepting the rival company's offer. She chose not to go for any of these options.

The way they have shown the events, it's certainly not the case that she doesn't have another option apart from the ons. It was one of the options during her time crunch, but still a choice she actively made over other options. Yes, agreeing to disagree would be best.

My problem with Visan is .he was clearly not ok with this but went ahead with it Why ? Answer to this is not clear

At the same time Katha could have handled the situation better. At last he asked her to leave if not comfortable. She should have left.

So it can't be termed as harassment

Viaan was not bound to give money to her. It was not possible that he would have said ok you are not comfortable but i will give you money..

I believe this parts the maker should have handled well.

1.why viaan moved ahead

2why katha could not tell or could not leave

By nor leaving she has given the consent

Having said that I am excited for upcoming episodes