Harry and Meghan | Official Trailer - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

70

Views

7.3k

Users

30

Likes

201

Frequent Posters

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: Briaahna

yeah , imagine this vulture Meghan gets stripped from her Royal title , she will end up doing price is right …displaying Walmart products for the audience 😄

How much clothes would she wear in this show ?

sev.puri thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#62

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


Then you clearly haven't read the tabloids during Diana's time. She was not mixed-race or even lower in class.


Royal family has its share of racists and is absolutely classist. But Meghan is a user, and Harry is a whiny jealous twit. They will go down in history right next to Wallis Simpson, Meghan's spiritual mama😆. Which is to say, nowhere.

I mean you’re also comparing a completely different era but yes, being mixed race or black is a lot worse than being privileged in 2022 when it comes to tabloids. Ask Rashford, Saka and Sancho. Like I said, no personal issue with Meghan being a “user” if it hurts the racist establishment.

sev.puri thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#63

Originally posted by: Briaahna

queens talwaar was her khamoshi … silence . And silence wins many battles . The biggest mistake Diana made is to give interview to Martin bashir , same mistake Michael Jackson did .

Other than the interview being procured by deceitful means (the crown s5 spent far too much time detailing this, it almost got boring), what was wrong about the interview? We aren’t all gifted with the ability to be deaf and dumb whilst we watch outrageous shit happen.

Swetha-Sai thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#64

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


Charles married her and expected her to be okay with his cheating. She wasn't. A lot of women relate to her. So she remains popular.


She wasn't perfect by a long mile, but she wasn't milking the situation for money like Harry and Meghan.


But yeah, she seemed to relish being more popular than the royals. That situation is also somewhat relatable to a lot of women for obvious reasons.

Word to your post!

Diana had class and did charity, patron of HALO Trust, etc 👍🏼

Her personal life ie her boyfriend, what she did, etc was kept private.

MaxMayfield thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago
#65

Kate and William flew commercial if I am not wrong..I saw some pictures as well online.


As for Harry and Meghan..I know Britain gets a lot of flak for being a racist country..which it may as well be, but other European nations are far worse and literally look down on Brown skinned people and Blacks toh dont even ask..I would say it is far easier to integrate within UK than it is in Germany or France for eg. Forget the rich nations, even the poorer European countries like Spain and Portugal have more attitude and disdain towards Asians than UK does at this point (maybe also because they are currently in need of talent, after Brexit etc). I dont think it is ever going to be possible to see an Indian origin man or a woman becoming a Premier in any of the other European countries, atleast Rishi made it in UK.


As for Meghan, The British Tabloids very much loved her as the modern face of monarchy..unlike them refusing to accept Wallis..but definitely things went downhill and there are rumours that the problem was actually between the two brothers..and that catapulted into issues between Kate and Meghan..but Meghan was also a bully and Harry was just blind in love..

Edited by MaxMayfield - 2 years ago
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago
#66

This couple is full of BS.

Meghan Markle trying hard to paint a picture of herself as Princess Diana Part 2.

People were with Princess Diana because she was wronged by her husband. She was a naive 18 year old who didn't know what she was getting into and before she realised what's happening she was already a mother of two in her early twenties.

Meghan Markle was no naive teenager she was part of show bizz which is much more a tough place to survive and therefore her claims sound hollow.

trouble_006 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Jimmy Jab Games Season 3 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 2 years ago
#67

Meghan and Harry are trashy. But that doesn't change the fact that they were hounded here by the racist tabloids and still are.

Edited by trouble_006 - 2 years ago
capricornrcks thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#68

Originally posted by: aparnauma

This couple is full of BS.

Meghan Markle trying hard to paint a picture of herself as Princess Diana Part 2.

People were with Princess Diana because she was wronged by her husband. She was a naive 18 year old who didn't know what she was getting into and before she realised what's happening she was already a mother of two in her early twenties.

Meghan Markle was no naive teenager she was part of show bizz which is much more a tough place to survive and therefore her claims sound hollow.


Diana was incredibly naive and taken advantage in the quest for a virgin pristine princess. But it's not as if she was totally ignorant about Charles' shenanigans. Didn't he date her elder sister at one point?

Mallika-E-Bhais thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 years ago
#69

Originally posted by: capricornrcks


Diana was incredibly naive and taken advantage in the quest for a virgin pristine princess. But it's not as if she was totally ignorant about Charles' shenanigans. Didn't he date her elder sister at one point?



Lmaoooo! the Cult of Diana is something else entirely. Yes Charles was with her elder sister at one point & then later Diana was suggested to him & Diana was always super eager to become royalty (her home Nick-name was “Duch”, short for Duchess, so clearly this wasn’t a secret either, as per Diaries of Diana)



Diana also, if people actually researched, was the first to cheat. Not Charles. Charles went into this marriage, calling off all his mistresses/lovers, he even gave away his beloved dog, Harvey, b/c Diana didn’t like the dog, she thought he was “smelly” (as per royal author Sally Bedell Smith) These authors state that Harvey just reminded Diana of Charles previous life & she hated it.


Diana had a LOTTT of mental health issues & while she was also a lady who had her good side who did some amazing things, this image of her being some angelic innocent is incredibly misinformed & plain stupid. She never was. She absolutely wanted to be royalty, had her own affairs & lovers, manipulated & played the media to a T & trashed Charles through them (which exists till today, just see a lot of the comments on this thread itself) & was known to stalk & harass her married lovers ( Oliver Hoare) What an innocent! LMFAOOO.



OT: M&H are absolute & COMPLETE GARBAGE. Since day 1, I always felt that this Markle woman is a grade-A narcissist & a terribly ruthless social-climber & nothing that she has done or said since, has changed my opinion. It’s only reinforced in stone now. Harry is the dumbest man alive but is totally complicit + is too in love with Markle.



Strip their titles so that atleast the Markle woman can’t go around cold-calling US senators with,” this is Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex.”😆😆


Edited by Mallika-E-Bhais - 2 years ago
FilmiDhun thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago
#70

Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais



Lmaoooo! the Cult of Diana is something else entirely. Yes Charles was with her elder sister at one point & then later Diana was suggested to him & Diana was always super eager to become royalty (her home Nick-name was “Duch”, short for Duchess, so clearly this wasn’t a secret either, as per Diaries of Diana)



Diana also, if people actually researched, was the first to cheat. Not Charles. Charles went into this marriage, calling off all his mistresses/lovers, he even gave away his beloved dog, Harvey, b/c Diana didn’t like the dog, she thought he was “smelly” (as per royal author Sally Bedell Smith) These authors state that Harvey just reminded Diana of Charles previous life & she hated it.


Diana had a LOTTT of mental health issues & while she was also a lady who had her good side who did some amazing things, this image of her being some angelic innocent is incredibly misinformed & plain stupid. She never was. She absolutely wanted to be royalty, had her own affairs & lovers, manipulated & played the media to a T & trashed Charles through them (which exists till today, just see a lot of the comments on this thread itself) & was known to stalk & harass her married lovers ( Oliver Hoare) What an innocent! LMFAOOO.



OT: M&H are absolute & COMPLETE GARBAGE. Since day 1, I always felt that this Markle woman is a grade-A narcissist & a terribly ruthless social-climber & nothing that she has done or said since, has changed my opinion. It’s only reinforced in stone now. Harry is the dumbest man alive but is totally complicit + is too in love with Markle.



Strip their titles so that atleast the Markle woman can’t go around cold-calling US senators with,” this is Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex.”😆😆



Thanks for the more balanced take on the Charles-Diana relationship. I am not anti-Diana but I can't stand Diana stans which is basically 99% of all the people on social media


And agree with you on H&M. On top of that both of them are terrible actors 😆

Meghan plays the race card and calls out the monarchy, but then loves stamping her "Duchess of Sussex" title frickin everywhere 🤣 Like girl, make up your mind!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".