Cheesy flashbacks - Page 21

Originally posted by: Moor278

Yes I agree....

What I meant when I said real and reel is.... Hamare logic ke hisab se VP shaadi invalid hai... Ghum logic se shayad nahi...

They have already skewed the law by saying V has to be married to adopt a male child (which we complained and was ignored)...

So I am assuming by that same twisted logic VP has to stay married or Vinu's adoption will be invalid too...

Truth will come out after his parentage reveal... If what I am assuming is right, V will have no reason to stay married to P and he can come out of it immediately. If P is negative, she will make it difficult for him. That will be his struggle... and a noose around his neck...

As for all the moments you mentioned, those happened pre Saavis reveal... supposedly he should change now... the outburst in previous episode should be consistent.... and not one off... only then those actions with P would look like they were in a situation where he had no plans to move on with Sai... if he does this with P even now after Saavi's reveal and knowing Sai still loves him, it would make him two timer. 😡

Infact, I dont want Sai to stay in CN till V is married to P 🤢... although shayad ye nahi hoga... I would be disappointed.

I would prefer the 2 parivar, 2 ghar thing rather than Sai moving to CN

See today they showed virat remembering romantic moment and in the next scene he indirectly mocks sai financial stability, don't felt the need to include her in their daughter's school matter.

Instead of that, had they showed virat asking sai how she managed to feed savi in all these years, understanding her struggle as single mother or atleast appreciating her for giving savi good upbringing by seeing the way savi behaved with elders. It would have been meaningful.

Instead they showed virat indirectly accusing sai of not giving good upbringing to savi just because she is financially weak. Now what purpose that flashback scene served when virat gonna continue his insensitive behaviour.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

exactly..but the actress and media portals were promoting her as positive 🤦🏻‍♀️

Woh kabhi positive nhi ho sakti...from her kankavli scenes I deduced this.

Originally posted by: Sinmegh

Has anybody seen drishyam 2 .. it’s doing very well .. how’s Jaggu ka part .. he will come back na in ghum land

Saw it yesterday. I wrote in apna Ghum ka Chat Club. I have three pointers which reminded me of Ghum

Originally posted by: asmi_ekaa

I get it kaafiyo ka closure would be Sairat coming together only.

So i understand 😊

I am one of that "kaafi" too 😉

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

See..I told you this is why I didn't like the writing in the past couple of days.

Why are they making her so weak at this point in the story? She should be questioning Virat on what he wants from her...rather than trying to bribe Sai

Make Pakhi grey...but make her interesting....they are flattening her character...

He shouldn't get free pass for all those intimate moments of him and pakhi.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

See..I told you this is why I didn't like the writing in the past couple of days.

Why are they making her so weak at this point in the story? She should be questioning Virat on what he wants from her...rather than trying to bribe Sai

Make Pakhi grey...but make her interesting....they are flattening her character...

Originally posted by: RejiBuji

I already watched original Malayalam version so guessed SB character

Same. I think I know which character he must be playing.

I avoided the Hindi part 1 because the original has no match! I might watch part 2 on OTT when it comes.

Originally posted by: scarlett22

Same. I think I know which character he must be playing.

I avoided the Hindi part 1 because the original has no match! I might watch part 2 on OTT when it comes.

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

@bold I agree

See today they showed virat remembering romantic moment and in the next scene he indirectly mocks sai financial stability, don't felt the need to include her in their daughter's school matter.

Instead of that, had they showed virat asking sai how she managed to feed savi in all these years, understanding her struggle as single mother or atleast appreciating her for giving savi good upbringing by seeing the way savi behaved with elders. It would have been meaningful.

Instead they showed virat indirectly accusing sai of not giving good upbringing to savi just because she is financially weak. Now what purpose that flashback scene served when virat gonna continue his insensitive behaviour.

The whole concept of "Sai being poor inspite of being a doctor" is illogical and laughable.

I have a feeling ye phirse uss orphanage se link karne ke liye kiya jaa raha hai... its the 3-4th time Sais financial status has been mentioned. Pehle UM-Sai convo main, phir uss broker ko, Phir uss dress dene wala scene main aur aaj...

Sai anyway needs to find a well paying job since she wont be going anywhere. And Nagpur is not Kankavli.

But orphanage job might be plot point again... since none of the dumb Chavanis have recognised Vinu as their own... to ye kaam bhi Sai ko hi karna padega.

P.S. I want P to be a culprit in putting up the marriage clause 🤣🤣

https://www.bollywoodlife.com/tv/ghum-hai-kisikey-pyaar-meiin-star-neil-bhatt-opens-up-for-the-first-time-ever-on-the-journey-of-sairat-exclusive-entertainment-news-2251750/