Intention to hurt - That's the difference

For these dumb idiots on the show demanding that if Archana wasn't thrown out, neither should Stan.... The host and the makers stuck to the intention to hurt theory, which Archana clearly did not have. When Stan ran towards Shalin WITH A VASE who he could not take on physically cos you're a 25 gram waste of space rap artist and the other is a bodybuilder twice your age..... What was his intention truly? Those quiet today under the crux of Archana were the same ones screaming that they wanted her out. The principles are not the same, do not be mistaken.

Stan defending this behaviour as don't friends swear at one another? Based on that logic he must be besties with Priyanka?

Stan is NOT a youth icon. He isn't inspirational and is a bully who is enabled with the strength in numbers he has behind him, that's it and if people think what he tried to do is the same as what Archana did then.... Very Chaalak, You Very Chaalak Bro.

How did Archana not have intention to hurt? For what other reason did she catch Shiv's neck?

It's all the samething. Anyone who raises a hand on the other person is wrong. Yeh jo naya logic intention or no intention is just cr@p to get some people back in house. So either both are wrong or no one is wrong.