This is the first time I'm hearing that we must imagine and assume what a fictional character is doing because the CVs don't show it for their own reasons. In a show or movie, you only go by what you see on the screen. That's the whole point. That's what we discuss and debate upon, the values and ideals they are showing. No one will go to the extent of assuming and creating their own scene that this is what someone does...When you look at the show as is, you just see that she is always at Shah House, even if not every minute, every single DAY. So she's promoting such a toxic ideal of repeatedly going back to your extremely vile and toxic "maykaa" and acting like their unpaid maid.
That way we can assume Baa is very nice at times when they don't show us or that Vanraj is deeply in love with Kavya and has always been a great human being, and that just that to make him the villain CVs have shown us only the bad side. You can assume about anyone in the show saying realistically this can't be possible. Realistically no family is as messed up as the Shah Family, where everyone is so toxic and awful for no good reason! So can we imagine that they are actually nice but that part is not shown to us? Maybe we should, it'll give us another reason to defend Anupama going back again and again. But then it takes way the mahaanta ki devi title she's been given, since they're all equally wonderful people.
You criticise a fictional character based on the actions you see on screen. She's FICTIONAL, she doesn't exist! The minute you have to start imagining and assuming things in order to defend their actions, you know it's time to stop trying and accept their flaws. If one can ask others not to criticize Anupama, others can also say don't support her blindly, when she's evidently wrong.
6