Ram- Vicky
Sita- Kangana
Lakshman- RajKumarRao
Bharat-Sidharth
Ravan- Ranveer
Hanuman- Rana
Vibhishan- Ayushmaann
SAGAI CANCEL 4.2
CAREER & MONEY 5.2
Barkha's new show, is her kyunki gig over!
🏏WPL 2026: FINAL: DC W vs RCB W at Vadodara on 05/02/26🏏
Alpha may be straight to streaming ?
Dhurandhar could be BW's first breakthrough in South
Dhurandhar - Peak Detailing By Aditya Dhar
Housewife - Alia Bhatt s next movie - a relationship drama
Best and Worst costume of main Naagins
Abhishek Bachchan’s 50th birthday- Aishwarya wishes him
Animal Park Updates
Dr Aarambhi Weekly TRPs
Ram- Vicky
Sita- Kangana
Lakshman- RajKumarRao
Bharat-Sidharth
Ravan- Ranveer
Hanuman- Rana
Vibhishan- Ayushmaann
NONE.
Bollywood actors are too urbane and modern looking as well as plastic to convincingly play Ramayana characters.
I would not choose anyone from current or even 90s BW to play Ramayana characters.
Also Ramayana should not be made. It is not a commercially viable tale in today's times for film audience.
Originally posted by: NatkhatPyare
Ram - Hritik Roshan
Sita - Aishwarya Rai
Lakshman - Kartik Aryan
Hanuman - Varun Dhawan
Ravan - Anil Kapoor
I can imagine all of them in their characters to an extent, barring Varun🤔.
He just doesn't have in to play Lord Hanuman.
Originally posted by: CrimeMasterToto
I think they biggest mistake they have done is focusing too much on VFX. Ramayan as a story is fairly simple, straight-forward (unlike Mahabharat) and does not require excessive use of CGI and VFX.
A lot of it is a tale of Ram-Sita-Lakshman's vanvaas and their encounters in the forest, which can easily be handled with sets and practical effects.
Only the battle scenes and some major milestones like Ram Setu, Sanjeevani parvat, etc. require effects. They just had to get the look and feel of the movie right, keeping the simplicity, in check and that would have been half the job done.
I completely agree with you. There was no need to rely so much on the special effects.
Following visuals are making my skin crawl😵😳.

Originally posted by: diasingh2
I can imagine all of them in their characters to an extent, barring Varun🤔.
He just doesn't have in to play Lord Hanuman.
Yes maybe u r right. He was just a compromise
as i can't think of any other bw actor to play Hanuman. Maybe some tv actor or someone from south...
None in todays bollywood can do Ram Sita lakshman hanuman
But Ravan role can be done by ashutosh rana may be 10 years back
Sita role for Deepika Padukone none else that too 7-8 years back not now in 2015 or so
I would say anushka shetty of bahhubhali fit role to T as Sita why did they not take her only
She will be good at confronting Ravaan and she looks like a Queen too in historicals
Ravaan can be Sudeep(Makhi fame) or Rana Daggubati both are excellent for Ravaan to send shivers down spine
Hanuman should be NTR Jr (RRR fame bec of his physique)
Lakshman can be Jayaram Ravi(Raja Raja Chola in PS1)
If you think of Ram very few actors can show vulnerability and action aura at same time even in south Prabhas is ok or Karthi (PS1) could do it he has that aura
Because we must think of reach and business too while casting hero not only acting chops
Hrithik will not suit Ram because some how is dialgue delivery sucks and actors real life alo will have impact on role
Hrithik is no one man woman image to accept him as Ram but Prabhas has no controversy so we can look at him and fel that we are seeing God
To play God character is not that easy as that aura should be there
I feel Anushka Shetty is best suited for Draupadi. Not Sita. Sorry to disagree with members here. But I have always felt Anushka had that fiery screen presence and look in eyes which is apt for Draupadi.
Originally posted by: atominis
I feel Anushka Shetty is best suited for Draupadi. Not Sita. Sorry to disagree with members here. But I have always felt Anushka had that fiery screen presence and look in eyes which is apt for Draupadi.
Why not Sita? Sita too withstood Ravans might alone in lanka till Lord Ram rescued her
When anuksha's Sita challenges Ravaan it will be worth watching
I agree she does not look very innocent or vulnerable but the character is standing alone and facing villan too which anushka can do well as proved in bahubhali
Sita is a more docile character. Anushka is too fiery for it.
Anushka cannot look convincing in scenes when Shrupnakha tries to kill Sita or Sita is worried when Ram goes to look for deer and does not return. Nor look convincing in dharti mein samana scenes or scenes where her character is questioned.
Anushka had done soft characters when she was young.
Originally posted by: atominis
Sita is a more docile character. Anushka is too fiery for it.
Anushka cannot look convincing in scenes when Shrupnakha tries to kill Sita or Sita is worried when Ram goes to look for deer and does not return. Nor look convincing in dharti mein samana scenes or scenes where her character is questioned.
https://youtu.be/8HiWKbDTc7w https://x.com/MMTollywood/status/1940620906797453464
https://x.com/worldoframayana/status/2006607281920815205?s=46
Well my goosebumps will be only after I see the film and they have delivered Let’s see what Nitesh has cooked...
A b c d https://x.com/malhotra_namit/status/1908741630342930463?s=46 t=vevCm3I0SGjUvmq-Bjkadg
Just that all know https://x.com/himeshmankad/status/1939710404994973788?s=46 t=vevCm3I0SGjUvmq-Bjkadg...
331