~ Discussion Thread ALL Version of GHKPM ~ #3 - Page 53

Nowadays LB works as my detox...pehle ghum dekh leti hun then watch LB 🤪

True... I would prefer a leap with Sai and kid that she hid from V than P as surrogate... i wish agar vo laate bhi hai to jaldi khatam kare use 🤢

Sai ko bahot jarurat hai CN se bahar rehne ki...

Yesterday someone mentioned... Why can't they adopt a kid from orphanage... Would be such a nice homage to Sam ... Since they couldn't save the baby blessed by him.

Originally posted by: Moor278

How is LB treating the same scenes differently... an example.

Yesterday was the scene where Raghav comes back home, sees Sindhu dancing and they have a conversation about Sid (Aniket).

Post that Raghav Sindhu have a fight and Raghav loudly calls Madhu for bringing him food.

The difference is He doesn't barge into her room like V did.

She is patiently waiting for him in the living area. Even though he had called her, he is not expecting her to be there.

He talks to her but doesn't mention Sid.

Later Rajashri (Ashwini) gives him food and talks to him which Madhu sees from faraway.

The complaint ghum FD had is V always blurs boundaries even in such small actions. They are bringing these small changes in narrative by showing that Raghav is different than V.

He doesn't crib about Sid to Madhu like V did to Pakhi and where she saw him getting jealous for Sai and thus used that in Ajinkya kaand.

I am really liking this version of ghum.

Just watched the scene...

That's what was needed....Virat-Pakhi scenes are so uncomfortable to watch...the blurring of boundaries

No matter how much we try to ignore it, it does have an impact on how we perceive the character

Something is certainly wrong with the person who writes Virat's scenes...not understanding the importance of writing Virat cleanly... He/She removes every shred of dignity from Virat's character ..by giving inappropriate, cringy scenes of Virat with other women

I am 1000% sure Sai & Virat are written by two different people...

PS: I find Neil-Ayesha unmatched in this scene.

Exactly... these are subtle minor issues which may have got unnoticed had it not affected later or V had been not so dicey...

And thsts why when I see this change in this version, the difference becomes apparent in how smartly they are dealing this.... this is what is expected out of a writer right? these nuances that make a hell lot of difference in the long run. 👍🏼

Originally posted by: Moor278

How is LB treating the same scenes differently... an example.

Yesterday was the scene where Raghav comes back home, sees Sindhu dancing and they have a conversation about Sid (Aniket).

Post that Raghav Sindhu have a fight and Raghav loudly calls Madhu for bringing him food.

The difference is He doesn't barge into her room like V did.

She is patiently waiting for him in the living area. Even though he had called her, he is not expecting her to be there.

He talks to her but doesn't mention Sid.

Later Rajashri (Ashwini) gives him food and talks to him which Madhu sees from faraway.

The complaint ghum FD had is V always blurs boundaries even in such small actions. They are bringing these small changes in narrative by showing that Raghav is different than V.

He doesn't crib about Sid to Madhu like V did to Pakhi and where she saw him getting jealous for Sai and thus used that in Ajinkya kaand.

I am really liking this version of ghum.

See which is true, he cant go barging into his ex lover's room he claims to still love, after being jealous over just a boy's name from his wife's mouth right? Too much double standard ho gaya..

Again I was one among them who kept saying, as a husband he did not maintain his boundaries, not with Pakhi and not with Shruti..

Ab men too cry ghusa sakte hain, chosing this very track, but it could have been also done by making Pakhi put a fake blame on him & he going in depression and Sai getting him, fighting for him, because you cant fight against a widow over claims of being pregnant. Right?

Why chose this track in the first place and this track to show he is upset & defeated...

Originally posted by: Moor278

Exactly... these are subtle minor issues which may have got unnoticed had it not affected later or V had been not so dicey...

And thsts why when I see this change in this version, the difference becomes apparent in how smartly they are dealing this.... this is what is expected out of a writer right? these nuances that make a hell lot of difference in the long run. 👍🏼

Why did you do this to me Moor? Bring in the writing.. This is my trigger point...you awoke the beast😆

Ofcourse these would make a lot of difference in the long run....it would have helped in sympathizing with Virat a lot more....whenever Sai failed to understand his love.

It is stupid to show Sai's insecurity by Virakhi blurring boundaries...they could have done it without such cheap stunts. The actual way to justify both Sai & VIrat's POV is to have an intelligent Pakhi...one who keeps her cards close to her heart...sly, but deceptively sweet ...which would make VIrat's failure in perceiving Pakhi's intention and manipulation understandable.

Here Pakhi's actions are so blatant...makes Virat look stupid. 🤔

And if they wanted to make Pakhi more sympathetic, they should have made her less vile...and also more vulnerable despite her cunning ways...maybe her parents die or she has only a sickly, widowed mother. Perhaps even make VIrat, Pakhi collegemates...will prevent audience from getting their ears burned from hearing friendship jaap for 2-day acquaintance..😵

PS: I fail to understand how professional writers can write such a shoddy script out of readymade material.🤔.

God lies in the details. We know Virat will always only love Sai. But these kind of 'nuances' make me wary of tracks where he fights with Sai. The reason why I stopped watching from the cowrie episode. Because he will not know how and when to draw the line with the surrogate.

Originally posted by: scarlett22

God lies in the details. We know Virat will always only love Sai. But these kind of 'nuances' make me wary of tracks where he fights with Sai. The reason why I stopped watching from the cowrie episode. Because he will not know how and when to draw the line with the surrogate.

Oh yeah..plenty of cringe..they are going to outdo themselves..I am wondering what is the boundary they will set

Originally posted by: scarlett22

God lies in the details. We know Virat will always only love Sai. But these kind of 'nuances' make me wary of tracks where he fights with Sai. The reason why I stopped watching from the cowrie episode. Because he will not know how and when to draw the line with the surrogate.

Completely agree... I pointed this out because i felt it is significant that they are doing this early on...

With V as time passed... He changed and got more interested in Sai.

In Raghav they are making it clear that he has accepted this marriage right from day one. He is not moping around like V was...

That's quite different than ghum and they are doing this early on. Raghav in that sense is more clear and matured than V about his marriage and the whole deal scenario.

I think Inka confession ghum timeline se pehle ho jayega. 👍🏼

Is Surrogacy track main to V ka aur butchering hoga jitna Shruti main bhi nahi hua tha... I don't know what sadistic pleasure these makers get by writing him so badly. He is a lead and they treat him like a villain. Uska koi redemption koi growth nahi hai. Rather he is degrading day by day... Pata nahi kya problem hai inko....

ML can be a grey character but they are making him black 🤣