KGF 2 is a highly entertaining film in my opinion. But if someone says the movie is problematic, I won't be able to completely deny it.
The whole love angle of Rocky and Reena is not only half-baked, it has elements of stockholm syndrome. To those who haven't watched the movie, the hero of this movie abducts his love interest and keeps her forcefully as his mistress for years, until she realises what a great man he is and accepts him.
Such problematic scenes where there in KGF 1 as well, like when Rocky sees Reena for the first time and straight up goes and says I love you to her. Then continues harassing her but does occasional acts of kindness which impresses her and she falls in love with him but he doesn't know it yet.
KGF 2 starts with Rocky abducting Reena and when asked why he did it, he calls her his "entertainment". He keeps her as his mistress for years and clearly she's not pleased but in the end accepts him.
Now, this works with the overall narrative because Rocky is shown as a piece of shit in the entire film. They make it more clear by changing the narrators. Prakash Raj's character doesn't see Rocky as a God or messiah like his father so in this film we get a more grey-shaded protagonist unlike the first part. He's an anti-hero, they even call him a villain and he does other villainous acts as well. Like exploiting the very people who he saved from Garuda in KGF 1, by also making them work for him. Or shooting up an entire police station filled with innocent people only because they took his one biscuit of gold.
And even in the end he took the entire gold he collected and drowned them along with himself, instead of maybe giving it to those poor people. The movie makes it obvious that Rocky is not a good guy. He's definitely no saint. Instead he's a guy who took the promise made to his mother too seriously and every villanous act done by him in the film shows how that promise is driving him into insanity. Dude had an obsession with gold throughout because he wanted to be the richest man!
But him harassing Reena had nothing to do with the promise made to his mother. The film could've totally avoided that and it would've made no difference to the main storyline. Its only included because such scenes are liked by the audience who love toxic masculinity. The hero showing the heroine that he's obviously more powerful than him, yet he's sparing her thus showing her place which is below him. Masses eat that shit up!
The treatment of the so-called heroine in both KGF films have been nothing but pathetic. Of course nobody in the audience is going to be inspired by Rocky and try to become the biggest criminal ever, but in a country where eve teasing, sexual harassment and rapes are common, it's not far fetched to believe that movies like KGF promote the mentality of toxic masculinity and misogyny.
I'm surprised that liberals who had so much problem with Kabir Singh haven't spoken up against this film yet. Because either they haven't watched the film or they believe any film South or any industry apart from Bollywood produces is absolute gold.
Because if this was a Bollywood film, critics would have ripped it apart just like Kabir Singh. Because the protagonist of KGF ain't much better than Kabir when it comes treating his lady love.
And KGF is not the only pan India south film which had problematic scenes. Bahubali 1 had a creepy waterfall scene with Prabhas and Tamannaah. 2.0 had Rajinikanth opposite Amy who is his granddaughter's age and had a scene where he opens her back zipper without consent and the movie plays it as something comedic.
Bahubali 2 and RRR thankfully weren't problematic. Pushpa was about to cross the line but stopped in the middle.
5