Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Is ignorance synonymous with racism?
Irrespective, of whether he mentioned Africa or Asia or not, Prince William's statement is prejudiced and ignorant. It conveniently forgets the violent and bloody history of Europe. The two world Wars were mostly fought in Europe. Ever since the wars Eastern Europe and the Balkans have been embroiled in some sort of perpetual conflict.
Don't get me wrong, I am pissed off at how ignorant and prejudicial William is being - but is he a racist? That's a serious accusation.
You might argue that racism is a form of prejudice and that his perception that it is unusual to see violent conflict in Europe (which is predominantly white) is racist. And I agree, the statement is racist or has racial undertones.
But, I ask, does making one racially prejudiced statement make a person racist?
I think we all have some misguided perceptions due to how media presents the world. Violence and conflict in predominantly poc nations are highly exaggerated, vilified, and presented as a problem inherent within the peoples and nation. Violence and conflict in predominantly white nations are downplayed, glossed over, and presented as a result of happenstance or other issues. So much so that even poc folks think violence and conflict are normal for their countries but unusual for white countries.
If a person of color from a region of wartorn conflict expresses surprise over violence in Ukraine - is that person racist? Yes, there may be some internalized racism because of perceptions but it is not intentional or malicious.
I feel that sometimes accusations of racism are thrown very arbitrarily. Sometimes people make prejudicial statements or racially biased statements not because they actually are racists but because the worldview they have been provided in their sheltered life is flawed. If a person sticks to their worldview and believes European nations or white people are inherently better than other nations or people of color then they are racist. But if a person acknowledges their limitations and is open to learning and bears no bias or ill-will to people then they are not racist. I believe that people deserve at least one chance to show they can be better before being labeled a racist.
That being said no one should be obligated or expected to show understanding to someone who has hurt them. And it is perfectly fine to hold a Prince to a higher standard of scrutiny than the average Joe. But in my opinion, being a racist is being a really shitty human being, and its quite a loaded thing to accuse someone off. There are indeed racists in this world and its fine to label them as such - but jumping the gun to label people able and willing to learn and change as racists just burns bridges and sets the world on fire.