SRK Trolled For Praying At Lata Mangeshkar Funeral - Page 33

Originally posted by: malikakas

Srk is one of my favourites. He is Indian. I loved him even more for his comments that his kid's religion is Indian. However, bhakts are pissed off with him for his association with Tony Ashai which is why they question his patriotism. And when I was defending him on twitter I actually didn't know how to answer that. But the conspiracy nut in me thinks the funding of Bollywood is probably more complex than anyone realizes not dissimilar to American politics.

For your last comment, just imagine Alabama, that can't handle a namaste in yoga, being expected to be woken up to the Azan at 5 am weekly. A country of 80% polytheists being told that there is only 1 God. Hinduism is ubiquitous in Indian but there is a level of deference that is expected in western countries towards Christianity that is not the same for India.

Here it is. I ;; give you the answer.

PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAASE. SRK has been trolled long before Tony Ashai. If that is the case, did you know our darling patriot Akshay Kumar was ALSO close to Tony? And was photographed with him? It was shown by Times Now before they could retract it. And they promptly never picked up that thread and piled on SRK.

Tony was an architect who worked in interiors, and he interacted with lots of people in Bollywood including Sonu and Mr FunnyBones. But why is it that only SRK was caught in the crosshairs? Could it be that it has to do with his surname?

I cant believe you say you consider him an "Indian" first and it was so easy to sway your mind without even critically looking at the narrative first.

Why do Bhakts also troll Aamir and Salman? and Saif and Kareena and their children? What could be the reason?

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

Recently 6 maulvis conspired and got one Hindu man killed for his social media post. This happened in Gujarat. That made me scared to move back. Sorry!

The post wasn't even offensive. Still, the victim took it down and apologized too. And yet...

Unfortunately, such murders in the name of religion don't make noise because they harm the popular victimhood narrative.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Now, bud😆. No, no. You do not get to put words in my mouth. Nor do you get to derail.

@bold — but you do that day in day out.

And you don’t even have the guts to quote me.

I said I like Sardar Patel more than Gandhi ji. You are using that to spread venom in other post. Have the guts to say it to me. Just hanging by patel supported Nazis. But what he did for India should be overlooked? I United all small kingdoms to make it one nation. That is huge contribution.

If time comes that you have to support Jews, you will run away and take sides. I won’t. Anti-semitism is no joke. But don’t use that in Indian context.

And dear non-violent Gandhi ji sent Indian soldiers to World war 2 to fight for Britishers. Now that’s ok. Gandhi ji ko sau khoon maaf. But Patel can’t have an opinion. Hypocrite you are.

I say I prefer Bhagat Singh’s way of freedom fight over Gandhi ji. Jo ukhadna hai ukhad le ja.

Originally posted by: Sashay01

Here it is. I ;; give you the answer.

PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAASE. SRK has been trolled long before Tony Ashai. If that is the case, did you know our darling patriot Akshay Kumar was ALSO close to Tony? And was photographed with him? It was shown by Times Now before they could retract it. And they promptly never picked up that thread and piled on SRK.

Tony was an architect who worked in interiors, and he interacted with lots of people in Bollywood including Sonu and Mr FunnyBones. But why is it that only SRK was caught in the crosshairs? Could it be that it has to do with his surname?

lol exactly. Tony Ashai is just an architect. He's very famous for his work and he supports Kashmir independence. So what? He's not even Indian. He is of American nationality and he claims to have Kashmiri heritage. He doesn't owe anything to India in that sense because he is not Indian.

When you work around the world, it's natural to come across people and associations of various ethnicities and religions and races. Nobody can do purity tests on each and every person to figure out if their politics and opinions match exactly with yours. That's a ridiculous expectation and not how reality works.

Grandpa himself hugs and chills with Imran Khan when necessary. So what?

What kinds of demands are being placed on people? These boundaries have deliberately been created as a way to only harass certain people.

Bhakts have been harassing SRK long before Ashai anyway. That is not an argument made on good faith.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

It's funny to watch some people who are so dead sure about their delusions.. one day when they will know reality what they gonna do 😆

haye haye… Jayshree..

Democracy ki death ho gai bhaisaab. 😆

Originally posted by: Sashay01

Here it is. I ;; give you the answer.

PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAASE. SRK has been trolled long before Tony Ashai. If that is the case, did you know our darling patriot Akshay Kumar was ALSO close to Tony? And was photographed with him? It was shown by Times Now before they could retract it. And they promptly never picked up that thread and piled on SRK.

Tony was an architect who worked in interiors, and he interacted with lots of people in Bollywood including Sonu and Mr FunnyBones. But why is it that only SRK was caught in the crosshairs? Could it be that it has to do with his surname?

I cant believe you say you consider him an "Indian" first and it was so easy to sway your mind without even critically looking at the narrative first.

Why do Bhakts also troll Aamir and Salman? and Saif and Kareena and their children? What could be the reason?

But why would such an architect be chosen by anyone in Bollywood? Like I said complex funding. My gut feeling says there is a deeper story we don't know. There are lots of people in this world that make money off of funding both sides of a conflict and average people become useful idiots fuelling fire on both sides.

Originally posted by: malikakas

But why would such an architect be chosen by anyone in Bollywood? Like I said complex funding. My gut feeling says there is a deeper story we don't know. There are lots of people in this world that make money off of funding both sides of a conflict and average people become useful idiots fuelling fire on both sides.

You really should find out facts first before making conspiracy theories without any real backing.

SRK has NEVER worked with Tony Ashai.

There was supposed to be a big project in Dubai at one point where Ashai would build it and Gauri would do the interiors. Both were hired for that job. That project never ended up happening because the market collapsed and the project never took off. That's how SRK knows Tony Ashai. They haven't actually done any work together nor has SRK ever hired him for anything.

The building behind Mannat was built by Faquih & Associates, a Mumbai based firm.

https://www.faquihandassociates.net/architectural/mannat-annex-building/index.html

And the Red Chillies office building was done by Red Architects, another Mumbai based firm, in collaboration with Ritesh Deshmukh.

https://www.redarchitects.in/architecture/commercial-architecture/red-chilies.php

It’s the usual suspect spreading their venom 🤢

It’s like the aryan khan case all over again… they were reveling in srks misery back then… questioning his parenting and mocking anyone who had the sense to see that it was bjp behind his kidnapping…. And as soon as it became evident beyond doubt that it really was bjp and their goons behind his incarceration sab k sab dum daba k bhaag gaye… koi jawab Nahin tha kyun k it didn’t fit their agenda… ulta they were getting mad k why are they being questioned abt their beloved party targeting a kid going to a party and trying to frame him for a crime he didn’t do… zahir hai jab baap hath Nahin a raha tu geedar bachay k peechay he jatay hain like cowards….

It's comical to watch some people who are so dead sure about their hateful delusions.. that even when the truth dances naked in front of them they will still turn their faces away refusing to let go of their hateful delusions

jab barabari ki har koshish nakaam ho jati hai tu jalnay walay nafrat ki har neechai pay girr jatay hain

Originally posted by: malikakas

For your last comment, just imagine Alabama, that can't handle a namaste in yoga, being expected to be woken up to the Azan at 5 am weekly. A country of 80% polytheists being told that there is only 1 God. Hinduism is ubiquitous in Indian but there is a level of deference that is expected in western countries towards Christianity that is not the same for India.

Not quoting the whole thing.

I agree WWII was much more nuanced. But again, Nazis! By the time Sardar Patel joined them, it was clear how bad they were. He could've done a Gandhi and refused to fight. But that's not what he did. He went and joined the other side which was several magnitudes more evil. The Koreans will attest.

The reconciliation with past should happen. Problem is there is no church or government belonging to the Mughals to now offer apologies. So who is expected to apologize? Indian-born Muslims? Christians for the Brits? And it's not even the need to reconcile that seems to be driving most of these posts. It's plain and simple Mughals were Muslims, Brits were Christians, both were invaders. Therefore, Muslims and Christians are foreign and to be stigmatized. No, they are not foreign. They are of Indian ethnicity and practice a different religion. They are as Indian as the people who make the ridiculous posts otherizing them. Their culture is also Indian culture. Indian MUSLIM culture.

Here, on this forum, someone called me a rice bag once. 😆 I didn't have the faintest idea what it meant. After it was repeated a few times, I asked someone. Apparently, it means someone who converted because a missionary offered a bag of rice. Strangely, this person didn't seem to see the irony in using that as an insult when he should've been trying to figure out what would prompt someone to give up something as personal as religion for food. A chance to feed his kids maybe? So who's supposed to apologize for that system where the poor and lower castes went hungry? Actually, still are.

Reconciliation would be a beautiful thing. But not when it is used as pretext for bigotry and not when it is limited to one category which is convenient to the elites.

Also, having grown up in India, I can attest there is a great deal of cultural deference shown to Hinduism. Government offices start programs with Ganapati puja. Schools do Saraswati Puja. Even the convent school I went to did. I don't know how much more deference one can expect than that. As for Azaan, one of my fond memories of childhood in India is being woken at 5 am by Suprabatham, azaan, and church bells all at the same time.

One Alabama doesn't take away from the other states where temples and mosques abound, and yes, cultural celebrations are encouraged. I live in Illinois where state universities celebrate Hindu festivals, sponsored by Indian clubs.

Once again, I don't expect the majority to hide their culture from the public square to make me comfortable. They will celebrate, and their celebrations will be front and center because they are the majority. Especially when I'm an immigrant, it's a choice I consciously make to live amid that culture. As long as everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, I'm cool with other stuff.

In fact, I'm more than cool. There are some who know me in real life on this forum. They will tell you how invested I am in ancient Indian litt and culture. To the point of obsession, actually. 😆 It belongs to me as much as to any practicing Hindu. They were my ancestors, too.

Anyway, it's good debating opposing points of view where we don't end up in a fistfight 😆.

Originally posted by: malikakas

On a similar note, I disagree with you on the Sardar Patel thing. At that time the social mores were very different. We are taught that the allies were the "good guys" but that's because history is written by the victors. But Britain and America were not what they are now. America and Canada interned hundreds of thousands of people with Japanese ancestry for 4 years which is not much different than concentration camps. Churchill was responsible for the Bengal famine which killed millions. Canada had a eugenics program up till the 70s that sterilized aboriginal women. America had segregation laws for Black people up till the 60s. So if I am Sardar Patel back in the 30s and 40s, I am not thinking one side is going to be a more cruel master than the other.

My paternal grandfather was involved in the freedom struggle. He went to jail with Gandhi for civil disobedience. One of my dad's cousins was a partner with Bhagat Singh and was hung along side him. I think Gandhi's non violence movement was revolutionary for the world at large. But I also don't begrudge anyone considering that maybe a more physically aggressive approach could have put us in a stronger position. The American independence movement also worked. And it gave Americans a sense of superiority to the Brits whereas I do think Indians suffer from an inferiority complex that has been harmful.

Bravo! Superb! What a way to say it. Thank You!! You win this thread..

@bold — thanks. I started having this opinion after I watched Udham Singh. That movie boiled my blood to no end. I cried and cried. What cruelty in Jaliyan Wala Baugh.

Lala Lajpat Raai died of injuries from Lathi charge by Britishers. Indians lost lot of lives in Freedom struggle. even after being Non-violent. Gandhi ji sent us to world war to fight for Brits. Again loss of lives.
No account for Jaliyan wala baugh massacre.

I don’t like the fact that we were more in numbers and we still took years to get freedom.

I have forever been huge huge fan of Bhagat Singh so his approach is my favorite. Sardar Patel for being iron man. That guy is strength personified. He got 12 votes and Nehru just 1. Yet Nehru was made PM. Gandhi ji asked Patel to step down. Tab democracy ki death nai hui thi? 😆