RockingSunny thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#1

Ye pratik to satwe asman par ur raha hai bhai guest ke samne badtameezi😲?? Can't take one criticism sportingly and then he sprays on ishan's face I mean what kind of a behaviour was that🤢. Aur sar pe charao ise age jake ye banda bb and sallu ka naam roshan karegašŸ‘. Yes ishaan was wrong in retaliating that way but pratik has provoked himšŸ˜•

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

878

Users

6

Likes

38

Frequent Posters

djoker thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#2

he cant and if anyone tells something he makes sure he hurts them badly next time with his word he is just a brat

FoodSmuggler thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 3 years ago
#3

Twitter and Gauahar Khan would like to disagree. It construes as violence if & only if your intent is to cause harm or damage to the other person.šŸ˜† Although Merriam-Webster doesn't use the words intent or intention in its definition for the word violence. My understanding of the word has been the use of force to hurt someone or damage something but seems like our education system has failed me. I was wrong about this my whole life.

Pratik ke intentions were not to harm Ieshaan, so it doesn't matter if his actions did end up causing any sort of damage to that young fellow.

By this definition, nothing ever is violence inside the BB house. Karan ke intentions bhi Pratik ko hurt karna nahi tha, his intent was to stop Pratik par agar woh violence tha, toh ye bhi hona chahiye.

I like Kundrra a lot but I still won't condone his behaviour. Karan was wrong then and Pratik is wrong now. Simple.

But people be like you didn't call KK out when he was wrong so you're not allowed to call Pratik out too. What a load of barnacles!

His intent could have been the purest of the land but that won't excuse the fact that his action could have caused mild damage to Ieshaan's eyes. Damage is damage, mild ho ya serious. But intention galat nahi tha toh chalta hai🤪

I'm saying this for whoever needs to hear it, doesn't matter who initiates it, violence is violence. Selective outcry nahi chalega.

You can't riot against something when it's done against Pratik and then turn a blind eye to it when Pratik dishes it out. Mera logic is this. Baaki you can't win against the internet and anyone who doesn't agree with me is free to feel offended.šŸ˜Ž

95027 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: CobraKai1972

Twitter and Gauahar Khan would like to disagree. It construes as violence if & only if your intent is to cause harm or damage to the other person.šŸ˜† Although Merriam-Webster doesn't use the words intent or intention in its definition for the word violence. My understanding of the word has been the use of force to hurt someone or damage something but seems like our education system has failed me. I was wrong about this my whole life.

Pratik ke intentions were not to harm Ieshaan, so it doesn't matter if his actions did end up causing any sort of damage to that young fellow.

By this definition, nothing ever is violence inside the BB house. Karan ke intentions bhi Pratik ko hurt karna nahi tha, his intent was to stop Pratik par agar woh violence tha, toh ye bhi hona chahiye.

I like Kundrra a lot but I still won't condone his behaviour. Karan was wrong then and Pratik is wrong now. Simple.

But people be like you didn't call KK out when he was wrong so you're not allowed to call Pratik out too. What a load of barnacles!

His intent could have been the purest of the land but that won't excuse the fact that his action could have caused mild damage to Ieshaan's eyes. Damage is damage, mild ho ya serious. But intention galat nahi tha toh chalta hai🤪

I'm saying this for whoever needs to hear it, doesn't matter who initiates it, violence is violence. Selective outcry nahi chalega.

You can't riot against something when it's done against Pratik and then turn a blind eye to it when Pratik dishes it out. Mera logic is this. Baaki you can't win against the internet and anyone who doesn't agree with me is free to feel offended.šŸ˜Ž


great post my friend. And bang on :)

Gauhar + fakebook for me = idgaf in her season for her and now :)


Kutey ki doom kabhee seedhee naheen hogee is simple answer to describe every behavior of sanskaare saaf dil putra

BB ki meherbaanee se aaj tak warning bhee naheen meelee. Perhaps it wakes up and nishkasheet hogaa… for his bakwaas at some point.

Edited by KJasoosChulbulP - 3 years ago
FoodSmuggler thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 3 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP


great post my friend. And bang on :)

Gauhar + fakebook for me = idgaf in her season for her and now :)


Kutey ki doom kabhee seedhee naheen hogee is simple answer to describe every behavior of sanskaare saaf dil putra

BB ki meherbaanee se aaj tak warning bhee naheen meelee. Perhaps it wakes up and nishkasheet hogaa… for his bakwaas at some point.

I've never held past winners' or contestants' views in high regard because every season is different and no two people have ever been in the same situation. Gauahar claims to be all high and mighty on twitter now but she selectively forgets her wrongs when she was a contestant. šŸ˜†

BB isn't going to so much as lift a finger about this blatant disregard of rules. This whole season has been laden with multiple instances of violence and BB conveniently chose to not take action on any party involved in it.

And let's face it, Pratik won't face any repercussions because whether we like it or not, he's important to the game. He has become the villain of the house and every story needs an antagonist.

Whenever contestants get violent, Bigg Boss be like

Gif

RockingSunny thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: djoker

he cant and if anyone tells something he makes sure he hurts them badly next time with his word he is just a brat

And is brat ko favour kiya jata hai
RockingSunny thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: CobraKai1972

Twitter and Gauahar Khan would like to disagree. It construes as violence if & only if your intent is to cause harm or damage to the other person.šŸ˜† Although Merriam-Webster doesn't use the words intent or intention in its definition for the word violence. My understanding of the word has been the use of force to hurt someone or damage something but seems like our education system has failed me. I was wrong about this my whole life.

Pratik ke intentions were not to harm Ieshaan, so it doesn't matter if his actions did end up causing any sort of damage to that young fellow.

By this definition, nothing ever is violence inside the BB house. Karan ke intentions bhi Pratik ko hurt karna nahi tha, his intent was to stop Pratik par agar woh violence tha, toh ye bhi hona chahiye.

I like Kundrra a lot but I still won't condone his behaviour. Karan was wrong then and Pratik is wrong now. Simple.

But people be like you didn't call KK out when he was wrong so you're not allowed to call Pratik out too. What a load of barnacles!

His intent could have been the purest of the land but that won't excuse the fact that his action could have caused mild damage to Ieshaan's eyes. Damage is damage, mild ho ya serious. But intention galat nahi tha toh chalta hai🤪

I'm saying this for whoever needs to hear it, doesn't matter who initiates it, violence is violence. Selective outcry nahi chalega.

You can't riot against something when it's done against Pratik and then turn a blind eye to it when Pratik dishes it out. Mera logic is this. Baaki you can't win against the internet and anyone who doesn't agree with me is free to feel offended.šŸ˜Ž

Great post you just sumed up all the postšŸ‘. You know I somewhat liked gauhar in her season and like her personality but when she starts her blind fangiri on twitter she becomes irritating. Every season she will turn a blind eye to her favourite's mistake and bash the other person for doing mistakešŸ¤”. Being a bigg boss winner when she does this horrible fangiri she looks worst but unfortunately miss perfect gauhar khan will never understand thatšŸ˜•

Same here I will never support what karan did but at the same way I can't ignore pratik's wrongšŸ‘šŸ¼

JustRandomGirl thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#8

lord pratik back to his original form 🤣

-Halo00- thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#9

Spraying deodorant when someone is faced away is not violence. If he sprayed it in his eyes i would say yes violent but he was just being annoying.

And if that is provocation, calling him macchar is too.

BB is a place where people will get on your nerves for the smallest things. It’s not who started it, that sounds like how kids blame each other. These are adults, if one is behaving poorly, the rest shouldn’t follow and if they do, everyone is at fault. And Pratik wasn’t even talking to Ishaan, he was complaining about Miesha’s choice. Miesha should have called him macchar lol

Don’t know why people find him so annoying. Everyone already knows he’s stubborn and doesn’t listen. They should stop with the screaming, ganging up strategy; clearly doesn’t work. They’re just mad he didn’t budge for captaincy task

RockingSunny thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: -Halo00-

Spraying deodorant when someone is faced away is not violence. If he sprayed it in his eyes i would say yes violent but he was just being annoying.

And if that is provocation, calling him macchar is too.

BB is a place where people will get on your nerves for the smallest things. It’s not who started it, that sounds like how kids blame each other. These are adults, if one is behaving poorly, the rest shouldn’t follow and if they do, everyone is at fault. And Pratik wasn’t even talking to Ishaan, he was complaining about Miesha’s choice. Miesha should have called him macchar lol

Don’t know why people find him so annoying. Everyone already knows he’s stubborn and doesn’t listen. They should stop with the screaming, ganging up strategy; clearly doesn’t work. They’re just mad he didn’t budge for captaincy task

I agree ishaan shouldn't have reacted that way he was wrong. But what was the need to start the fight?? The way he called showpiece that looked wrong but yes retaliation was equally wrong. But what was the need to spray?? He didn't spray it for something good right?? Yes ishaan shouldn't have thrown the showpiece like that but for that pratik literally sprayed on his eyes which could have damaged his eyes. That's why I made this post because this is what pratik does first provoke a fight and then when he gets retaliated take good advantage of thatšŸ‘ŽšŸ¼. Anyways we may have different pov. But if you say pratik and ishaan both were wrong I agree with youšŸ‘šŸ¼

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".