Originally posted by: unicornwriter
Sorry to have barged in into the conversation but i just couldn't help it. Nosey me.
But i think you're getting her perspective wrong here. All she wants to say is that Pallavi has just figured out by putting two and two together and his her opinion she would find it more reasonable and logical for Pallavi to fight with them rather than involving Raghav when she's not even aware of the whole real situation. She's had an instinct and she would rather work on it first before creating a huge drama depending on how the previous days have gone by.
Also trying to read between the lines too but there's no bashing of Raghav in those sentences so nobody has to go defensive or anything. Raghav was reasonable. And that's true. He was reasonable until the writers started degrading the character but if we go fictional wise then he's in a fix right now. With soo many emotions all over the place. He is still guilty and worried for his wife while he has a time bomb sort of ex walking around in his house. Also the man has a business to run rather than indulging himself into kitchen politics. 🤷🏻♀️
Just my thoughts. I hope i am allowed to do that. ❤
I re-read her post several times before and after responding. I don't bother reading between the lines because I go by the actual text of what was written in the post. I don't like to assume because that can lead to misunderstandings. The poster made it seem like because I said Pallavi would play mind games that I am accusing her of doing something negative or villainous. You can play mind games for good reasons too and that's what you need to fight back against people like Sunny and Esha. The line about Raghav being reasonable seems to have been added by the member a bit later on btw, unless I missed something. I am not analyzing Raghav's state of mind here on in the other post. I only wanted to point out that the earlier Raghav who would have literally smelled people out is not here, at least not in this track.
My initial comment had nothing to do with RaghVi solving things together or her having to defer to Raghav to solve the issue. I said clearly that the old Raghav would have detected something but not this one and I also said that Pallavi will solve the problem. What's wrong with my statement? Why am I being given justification for why Pallavi is best placed to solve it first? There's no need for it because I didn't say there was anything wrong with her trying to figure things out and deal with Sunny alone or otherwise. She was able to crack the accident mystery as well when Raghav wasn't able to see the truth. So what if she finds a way to expose or defeat Sunny this time? They need a win right now becaue the baddies having been scoring one after the other and messing everything up. Why is it that I can't even talk about Pallavi or say a single sentence about her without having to hear tons of justification about her actions, especially when I neither bashed her nor made up anything. I am going based on the precap (her look saying she was on to Sunny causing trouble) and Shivangi's insta story.
As I said a while ago on the forum, Pallavi doesn't need to be defended, I believe. She is a strong person who knows her mind and can deal with challenges. As a human being she's bound to make errors (like all human beings are) but her intentions are always genuine. That's her character sketch. I am not one of those who like or advocate for abla naari bechari type of FLs (or any women characters like that for that matter), which is why I always found her refreshing. If Pallavi finds a way to defeat or teach these people a lesson, especially because they are attacking her directly not just her family, then it's good to see her thought process. Why shouldn't she be sneaky and give them a taste of their own medicine, pull the rug from under their feet, etc.? Why does an FL have to take the righteous path all the time? Karke dekh liya, didn't work so it's cool if she wants to try something else as long as it's not illegal or unethical. Why do I have to write 3 posts to make my point? Why are those who like Raghav not allowed to talk about Pallavi or discuss her actions on this forum? Loving Raghav does NOT automatically equal hating or disliking Pallavi. Nor does it mean that if you like Raghav you can't like Pallavi.
You are of course free to share your thoughts. It's an open forum and I always like hearing multiple perspectives. You can check my track record on this forum and on IF in general. I have never bashed or insulted any member, ever. I am just really disappointed that in the bid to defend the other poster you may not have considered who I wrote the first post in response to (Chahat talking about Raghav ka dimaag ki batti). Again, that's what it seems like from your post here but if I missed something, feel free to clarify.
If people will respond to my post to another member and not read or understand the context, or judge me in whatever way they want, then what can I do? This is not the first time it's happened on the forum (not saying it was you) and this is why people refrain from saying even good (or neutral) things about Pallavi because of such reactions. Show khatam ho jaayega kuch hafton mein, par jaate jaate aise attitude dekh kar bohot bura lagta hai.
Edited by inlieu - 4 years ago
