@b: And this is exactly why EK shows or even Rajan Shahi shows go on for years. I'm traumatized by EK and the Co.'s shows and tracks for life but gotta give credit where due. People don't expect it to be all lovey-dovey all the time but there is a reason the leads are called "the leads". They're supposed to lead, not be treated as secondary characters whose feelings and thoughts don't matter to the audience. I get his excitement to introduce these negative iconic characters because maybe he wants to do what TV shows in the West do: have one or two big baddies who are evil and outright negative or questionable and yet people manage to gush over them or connect to them. It's a great thing to experiment but ITV's demography is different, and so are our expectations. Not to mention that Western shows still do a great job of balancing the ss they give to the antagonist/s and the leads. In an attempt to make it intriguing and suspenseful, SS ruins the organic charm of his shows that so many creatives *cough* EK *cough* never manage to create in their shows.
@bold: 100000000%
The whole reason why anyone sticks to these ITV shows are for the leads - both of them. Them reducing P to essentially R's love interest is what killed the motivation for wanting to watch both the M and E track. Also this was a show that was HEAVILY lead couple forward. Up until the end of HYD - they were in about 80% (?) of the episode. At least that's how it felt. So to go from that to a 50% (during M track) and now maybe 30% is too much of a drop off. No one cares about the villains.
if he wanted to create a villain to love - then sympathy needs to be created first. He couldn't do that with M and tried to do that with E but he pulled the trigger too early. E needed to be shown as a real DV victim and seemingly over R if they wanted to garner sympathy for her. Plus they need a better actor to pull it off LOL.
