Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose
Ex DG of NCB said that he was tested twice and has to be negative else it would have been out in the media; some people like Archit I guess were not tested.
Most credible media is also reporting that drug tests came out negative.
Also, it seems like Sameer Wankhede’s father had converted to Islam as his wife was Muslim before Sameer was born but started writing himself as a Hindu & SC again when he thought it’s more beneficial that ways. But sameer’s BC shows he’s a Muslim.
There are old FB posts of his father with Muslim name, he’s also shared Islamic messages on FB.
And no, I Maharashtra 2008 esp Muslims can’t be SC.
This is very messed up now.
the court documents dont mention tests at all. Nothing about them is submitted in the court. They are not alleging it.
Their entire case is based on WhatsApp messages, that are already on record and even if he is bailed out he cannot temper with past messages.
Further, Aryan was not in possession of drugs, his friend was, how can he be said to be in conscious possession, in criminal law you just cannot do that.
Also, the meagre amount of 2.6 g, I am reading the wrong law it seems because the Bare Act that I read talks about big amounts- the act clearly segregates between consumption and commercial quantities. And even if they prove Aryan to be a consumer, the act talks about rehabilitation program and not jail.
Also, I would like to draw attention over here on the fact that the court has given a 21 page order, rejecting the bail when the SC has clearly held in Harjit Singh v. Inderjeet Singh & Anr. that when ordering on bail, the order should be short and the court is to refrain itself from discussing the merits of the case.
The court here is in clear violation of a Supreme Court ruling; when did an NCB court become so big to violate the SC???
Cricket
