bharat in denouncing his mother:D/POTW

Poll

could we support what bharat did?

Login To Vote
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#1

well, after hearing what kaikeyi has brought upon the entire family bharat in a fit of rage denounces his motehr and also curses her.

i am not talking about any sort of poetic, religious spiritual significances but honestly , if we take away everything and think of bharat just as a son who lost his father and is separated from a beloved brother for the idiotic approach of a vain mother:

is his behaviour justified?

Edited by akhl - 17 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

21

Views

1.9k

Users

8

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

246851 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#2

taking away everyotehr thinga nd judging by ordinary humn sense i think he made a profound mistake

kaikeyi was his mother after all

sitakshii thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 17 years ago
#3
nopes !! tan !! what Bharat DID WAS RIGHT ,he broke all his relations with her as becaz of her only his father died & his such a SWEET BROTHER RAM,LAXMAN & his bhabhi SITAJI suffered a lot!!!

if i wud have been in place of bharat i wud have done the same thing !!! after all it was becaz of kaikyeye the whole RAGHUKUL WAS SHATTERED & SEGGREGATED & urmila,mandavi kaushlaya,sumitra ,all ayodhya ppl suffered a lott....

but later RAMA ASKS bharat to pardon his mother kaikyeye !!!
Shruti11 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 17 years ago
#4
well tan i feel watever bharat did was right kaikey was the sole reason of raghukul nash because of her dashrath die because of her 2 vachan ram sita laxman go to exile of that kaushlya sumitra looses there husband, sons and daughter-in law.urmilla mandavi looses there husband .praja loose there raja and future raja.of this exile sitaji suffered whole life i mean she was kidnapped by ravan then whole war and when she return aayodhya because of all this 1 more time she got exile the kuldeep of raghukul luv kush never get mother and father luv together .i mean if u see because of that 2 vachan no one even after 14 yrs remain happy the whole raghukul happiness ends
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: shruti_gauri1

well tan i feel watever bharat did was right kaikey was the sole reason of raghukul nash because of her dashrath die because of her 2 vachan ram sita laxman go to exile of that kaushlya sumitra looses there husband, sons and daughter-in law.urmilla mandavi looses there husband .praja loose there raja and future raja.of this exile sitaji suffered whole life i mean she was kidnapped by ravan then whole war and when she return aayodhya because of all this 1 more time she got exile the kuldeep of raghukul luv kush never get mother and father luv together .i mean if u see because of that 2 vachan no one even after 14 yrs remain happy the whole raghukul happiness ends

in a way both of you are right

but even then denouncing your own mother, who brought you to earth is a bit tough going

lets see what others say about this😛

akhl thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6
There is rarely any action in the world, which is completely white or completely black. Depending on the situation, the same thing can be right or wrong.
What Bharat did was both right and wrong. But, overall, he was right. Denouncing one's mother is definitely wrong. Mother is highly respectable. But mother only is not everything for a person. Dashrath (Bharat's father) was also highly respectable for Bharat. Because of Kaikeyi, Bharat lost his father. It is very rare to find an elder brother like Ram and bhabhi like Sita. Because of Kaikeyi they two and also Laxman had to suffer various hardships in jungle for 14 years.
So, taking everything in consideration, Bharat's action was justified.
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: akhl

There is rarely any action in the world, which is completely white or completely black. Depending on the situation, the same thing can be right or wrong.
.

well said, what Bharat did neither can be fully supported nor can be totally reproached

divingdolphin21 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#8

well i feel in today's world it would hve been ruder than wht happened

i ll go with 50 - 50 Bharat did that inreturn with what his mother did but we are always taught to forgive people so i really cant decide!

246851 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Divingdolphin13

well i feel in today's world it would hve been ruder than wht happened

i ll go with 50 - 50 Bharat did that inreturn with what his mother did but we are always taught to forgive people so i really cant decide!

definitley its a hard choice and so i put it up to see what we all feel

i feel tehre was a bit of lack of morality on bharat's part too

camella thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#10
well...everyhing happens for the good..and what bharath did in a way was right because if he wouldnt have done tht then kaikeyi wouldnt have got back to her senses..good for her tht she got a jhatka ( zor ka ) from bharath 😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".