Originally posted by: meghumonu
Nehru and his family are the sole reason India were not taken seriously all these years!! The man as a prime minister proposed India is a non violent nation let's remove army and just keep a paramilitary force. Does it make any sense? His blunder of trusting the bloody Chinese led to the butchering of the Indian soldiers by the Chinese and the rape and massacre of women and men in Aksai Chin area. His daughter was responsible for attacking the Golden Temple and led to her brutal death and almost Sikh genocide incited by Congress Party. His son interfered in Sri Lankan Civil War and to support the Sinhalese and not the Tamil people who were fighting years of injustice and torture at the hands of Sri Lankan government. His helping the Sinhalese not only led to his brutal death but the inherent hate that Tamil people carry to these days for North Indians and Delhi politics. His daughter in law was the unofficial PM during the Manmohan Singh's era and 26/11 and various Terrorist attack happened and Indian government in response did nothing. This family is just opportunistic and traitors to this country.
i agree with you... if not for INA... brits would have stayed here... n we wouldnt b discussing all this shit...Gandhi never really wanted full freedom of India... he just wanted few laws that benefit indians under the brita rule... it was Bose n other who demanded complete swaraj... you know y? Because gandhi was the mediator n a figure of importance for that.... he didnf wanted it all to go away... that fam n importance, which actually happened after independence... he was also partial... against all the votes he chose nehru to b the PM n not Sardar Pat3l who was the more deserving candidate.
All nehru did in his time as PM was had affairs all around India and world... even L Mountbatten 🤔
While sardar patel went around india to unite the nation after brits left it in a staggering and divided form.
Also it was influence of nehru n his fam who forced their kind of curriculum. Have u read history books? Have u read about shiva ji, subash chandra bose, rani lakmshi bai? All the hindu indian warriors? All the hindu kingdoms? Because i think they ( if any were there ) were discussed in a single chapter in a single para. These dynasties... ( many of them weren't even named or introduced) they were not taught all we were taught was an elaborate form of dehli sultanet...then mughals... ( every other rajput aur maratha is introduced as an enemy which makes them look evil and these mughals as heroes) then tit bits of other freedom fighter... n then gandhi... nehru... indira... n now they might introduce sonia and rahul too.. if they ever gain power...
They have huge role in everything... because for once whats written in the book might not really go hand in hand with the reality and what practically happened.
@sreejita
Edited by TheRoadNotTaken - 4 years ago