Originally posted by: MistyDawn
Yesterday Raghav revealed that he didnot know that the man he saved that night(Mandhar) had died (later on) so he was only "protecting" his sister from the accident..
So my question is apart from the guilt, which would obviously be more if he had known that the person had died, would things be any different? As in, its not like he would've handed her over to police if he had known that Mandhar had died. He would've still protected her like he did when he came to know the truth on the day of Vat Savitri. So I think people should stop assuming that saving Keerthi was so Pallavi doesnt get hurt. No! Saving Keerthi was for Keerthi alone. Yes surrendering himself sure was for Pallavi.
Vaishali, this is exactly what I was discussing with someone yesterday. Many are stressing that Raghav did this to give Pallavi the closure she needed but I have always felt Raghav is doing this only to protect Kirti and he had to do this because Pallavi wanted justice and she wasn’t ready to give up until the truth is revealed. So since he is doing it because she didn’t give him any other choice, it feels like he is doing it as a closure to her but he is doing it to protect Kirti. He knows he is hurting Pallavi but he has been telling her, this is all he can do and how it needs to be done in order to give her the justice she needs.