Sabse bada sawal hai ye to abhiiii
🏏IPL 2026: SRH vs CSK, 27th Match, at Hyderabad 🏏
🏏IPL 2026: RCB vs DC,26th Match, Bengaluru 18 Apr 3:30pm IST🏏
Ranveer Deepika Confirm Baby No 2
🏏IPL 2026: KKR vs RR, 28th Match, at Eden Gardens🏏
🏏IPL 2026: PBKS vs LSG, 29th Match, at New Chandigarh 🏏
Deepika Ranveer Announce Second Pregnancy
MAIRAs CASE 18.4
Two albums from 2001: which one do you prefer?
MAIRA IN CUSTODY 19.4
Who should be the FL of Gen 5?
Janhvi Kapoor Alcohol Addiction
Versatile Legendary Asha Bhosle ji Still alive at India Music Forum :
🏏South Africa Women vs India Women, 2nd T20I, Durban🏏
Sabse bada sawal hai ye to abhiiii
Originally posted by: subbuappu
Hehe... That's what I thought so.. arey when they don't know the correct one, better they keep it in english... Vaise Ved ko kaha Telugu aata hoga??? I guess they thought Ketan might know and wanted to keep things authentic.. they should have keep it like how pallavi wrote in english for hindi wordings on marriage night... Ketan also mightbhave thought that who will dig deep in this... But he might not know forum wasis have all sort of theories and people do know how to read telugu...🤣
Vedant Iyer is his full name na?
Manasi sangeet night after being slapped Raghav told his Amma iyer uncle ka beta vedant
Makers and the entire team should know FD baal ki khaal nikaalta hai
Sai ketan doesn't know how to read Telugu ho sakta kyun nai
I don't know how to read or write Gujrati born and brought up in Maharashtra
Originally posted by: Chahat_A_Doshi
If the death was accidental why not
There was this movie
Aishwarya arjun rampal priyanshu
Arjun was in love with Aish accident happens husband does she loses her memory falls in love with arjun
At the end remembers forgives him saying it was an accident
IDK, I feel a lot of things are acceptable in movies which aren't on TV, because movies are a one time commitment, so they can go for shock value, while TV shows need to retain audiences for long, so they tend to play a lot safer. I wouldn't mind this plot, but I'm doubtful they'll go that dark at a 6.30pm slot on a channel like Star Plus. Who knows, though?
yaar i was thinking the same what if he is guilty…Originally posted by: aye-masakalii
Is it possible that Raghav did indeed 'kill' Mandaar? Sure, he has a strong rule about not harming innocents...but what if he wasn't innocent? And it was a confrontation that got ugly, or something? That would explain the lack of any guilt associated till he found out exactly who the man was.
It would certainly be interesting, and not unbelievable, keeping Raghav's profession in mind, but I doubt they'll go that way, because it both puts Raghav in a position of having massively wronged Vijay, and I do believe it won't be accepted by audiences to have a woman married to the man who killed her husband. Plus, I doubt the show could ever go back to it's romcom-y vibes after going that dark.
It's an extremely vague thought in my head, just thought I'll put it out there in case anyone has a view.
but they have already shown raghav being guilty for 10 years for blame of killing nana and arjun..!! If they show the same guy killed mandar and not even realised when pallu was calling mandar’s name again and again,that will be a major contradiction .
Matlab aisa thodi hai nana aur arjun tumhare apne the to tum guilty feel karo (directly kuch na karke bhi)but tumne accident kara phir bhi maathe par shikand tak nahi??mandar ka naam sunke bhi no reaction in the past??
I thought raghav was panicking because mandar was related to pallavi and not because he killed him?
Personally as a viewer i cannot accept this yaar!
One more thing, how come ved knows the person who died was mandar deshmukh?? And raghav doesn’t even know the name? Ye kuch jam nahi raha😔
Raghav will be permanently guilty in the eyes of sharda and pallavi..bakiyoko i don’t even consider!
may be with special nariyal pani given by Ved
Raghav is ignoring her
Gham mein gala geela kar liya hoga
Originally posted by: aye-masakalii
Is it possible that Raghav did indeed 'kill' Mandaar? Sure, he has a strong rule about not harming innocents...but what if he wasn't innocent? And it was a confrontation that got ugly, or something? That would explain the lack of any guilt associated till he found out exactly who the man was.
It would certainly be interesting, and not unbelievable, keeping Raghav's profession in mind, but I doubt they'll go that way, because it both puts Raghav in a position of having massively wronged Vijay, and I do believe it won't be accepted by audiences to have a woman married to the man who killed her husband. Plus, I doubt the show could ever go back to it's romcom-y vibes after going that dark.
It's an extremely vague thought in my head, just thought I'll put it out there in case anyone has a view.
They keep projecting him as don and gunda, this all comes with it. Raghav, definitely knows Mandaar by face, not name. How? an employee or someone he hired to do his tax bachana chores like Nikhil did. Karma, what else to say. No wonder the "you will go to jail" words of VD were echoing in his mind.
I am not in either if he infact killed Mandaar for whatever reasons be and stay happily married with Pallavi. But we never know, there will be serious trust and misunderstandings and because he genuinely loves and cares for her, he could work patiently this time to win her over again? When audience can accept so many weddings after weddings in shows like Balika Vadhu, why not? I am not a fan of this route, but hey it works.
Originally posted by: JayashreeR
may be with special nariyal pani given by Ved
When I wrote someone 🤣drunk on nariyal pani
Ye best tha abhi tak ka
Mujhe peene ka shauk nahiiiiinnnn...peeti hun gum bhulane koooo
yaar i was thinking the same what if he is guilty…
but they have already shown raghav being guilty for 10 years for blame of killing nana and arjun..!! If they show the same guy killed mandar and not even realised when pallu was calling mandar’s name again and again,that will be a major contradiction .
Matlab aisa thodi hai nana aur arjun tumhare apne the to tum guilty feel karo (directly kuch na karke bhi)but tumne accident kara phir bhi maathe par shikand tak nahi??mandar ka naam sunke bhi no reaction in the past??
I thought raghav was panicking because mandar was related to pallavi and not because he killed him?
Personally as a viewer i cannot accept this yaar!
One more thing, how come ved knows the person who died was mandar deshmukh?? And raghav doesn’t even know the name? Ye kuch jam nahi raha😔
Raghav will be permanently guilty in the eyes of sharda and pallavi..bakiyoko i don’t even consider!
I'm sure Raghav has seen and participated in a fair amount of bloodshed in his line of work, though. Bandook decoration ke liye toh nahi rakhta hoga na? He had guilt over Ajit and Arjun as they were innocents caught in the crossfire of someone else's mistakes, but if Mandaar wasn't, then I would understand him not being guilty, till he realized that this person who died was Pallavi's husband.
As I said, I really doubt they're going to take this route. Much like you said, a lot of viewers wouldn't accept this. But it's still fun to think about and speculate, which is why I posted.
As for how Ved fits into everything, yeh toh show mein hi pata chalega. But I'm glad they seem to be unraveling the past rather efficiently.