Originally posted by: dramebaaz.af
Renee point of Khushi going through character assassination because of Arnav and Shyam is something I agree with. Ultimately I think the show's writing was lazy and relied on regressive troupe in order to have a damsel in distress. I think the plot of the show was strong but the writing, incredibly reductive. They were more invested in having easter eggs and foreshadowing in episodes than in clearly have decent scripts.
You know, the classic thing of Sita only giving Agnipariksha. ITV laps up assassinating the character of a woman *sigh* it happened even now in shows like Shaurya aur Anokhi, Mehendi Hai Rachnewaali where at one point the male lead will say shit about a woman's character that the show tries to justify as jealousy or revenge. It's crap.
Just saying if we had the Khushi during the resignation scene - I miss that version so much!
I agree with certain things about Arnav's character that you've pointed out. Arnav was going to confess to Khushi. We know about this because he did want to speak to her and a day before he understood that Khushi fits the bill of the love his sister talks about so much. But Arnav was not going to take a no room Khushi. Khushi suffered by hands of Arnav more than Arnav did from Khushi. I like to often think about the fourth promo of the show with Arnav in rain and Khushi standing by a window and Khushi saying 'kyun mein tumse nafrat nahi kar pati'. Khushi doesn't understand her feelings for Arnav at all, and if Arnav were to never exclaim his love, she wouldn't have voiced it out as well.
Khushi can never hate Arnav, that's the deal of the show. But to slightly disagree, Arnav was only going to confess because he already had his answer. As a businessman, he wouldn't place his bets on something that he wouldn't know wouldn't work. Khushi had given soft yet strong indication that she feels the same (which he later thinks he misinterpreted). From wearing his gifted bangles all day to giving shy smiles and gently prodding him to say what he wants to say.
Arnav was extremely territorial about Khushi and I think that was the reigning thing that drove him to marry Khushi. He wouldn't have been able to bear anything that Khushi said if it wasn't in support of his own feelings.
You're right about Arnav asking Shyam for clarification. Arnav did not believe in love nor did he wanted to do anything for love. His choice of companionship was reflected in Lavanya. A partner who would love him, would go to any extent for him, would fit into his world perfectly. A partner he wouldn't have to make any effort towards. But Shyam and Anjali's relationship gave him a glimmer of hope. I think thats' why Anjali's definition of love is important for Arnav in deciding his love, thus Shyam was more answerable to Arnav than anyone else however the same can't be said for the rest of the family members because they resorted to gender patterns of asking answers from the girl rather than damad ji.
Oh God, I HATED the Raizada's SO much when they yelled at Khushi (???) for the marriage. LOOK AT THE AGE GAP AND WHY BLAME THE WOMAN? In a way I'm ok thinking Arnav chose to question the person he thought he knows better as opposed to thinking 'let's ask the woman how she managed to derail Shyam from his good behavior with her seductive charms' (the narrative Shyam laters pushes post kidnapping).
I think ultimately Arnav's marriage to Khushi was driven not because of wanting to protect Anjali and leaving Shayam with no options, but because he wasn't going to let Khushi go. In tying Khushi to himself, he killed two birds with one stone. In the end, he chose his love and his feelings before finding a way to protect his Di's illusion of love.
You know this is a question I do want to ask the writers - what would've happened after six months!
31