New promo : Rudhita marriage is illegal now 👏👏 - Page 4

Originally posted by: Alexia_Wilson

But mutual expression of will being asked by a child doesnt sound much well. I agree their guardians must be sought and they should know about it.

But there has to be a middle ground. Even if people disagree with it does it make it good? People will diagree and then no effect will be seen

This is the first step to social reforming and women empowerment my dear. You cannot think everything will be perfect from very start. Mistakes are gonna be there. No offence but India had just started understand its opression over their women. For them to actually make everything perfect..I believe is hard,

A middle ground is needed. For the annulment of the marriage there must be some conditions put forth. Blindly making the bride leave the Sasural is not the right thing. And will never be.

Do you actually believe I didnt think of that? Law was itself unstable at the time of British rules.

None can be called Chodi hui aurat! As they werent the ones at fault. But does society ever listen?

From the perspective of Rudhita its understood but from the perspective of others in the same place its not something we have seen.

What are we expecting Anirudh to do? I agree that this was something he has done imperfectly. But do you actually believe its better she live with him? Do actually think he understood the consequences of his actions before this?

Its going to take them time to understand that their relation wasnt just about being spouses. For them this has to be the step.

Just like how for those child brides they need to understand that now the ones whom they called their Sasural are going to be just a past memory.

This India was a patriarchal society and no offence but they never understood the victim's plight. But now reforms are happening. Now they are understanding...

UL:: A big question. laws doesn't mean society and acceptance, proof for such malpractices existing even the day.

What would be Anirudh's take on the changed approach of society to Bon, now? Will he fight those stone pellets to her in the name of her character ?

@ Bold : what are we expecting? The honest answer is I dont know what to expect.It by in itself is a complex situation with many layers, with Anirudh complicating it more with his twisted plots. In the whole process atleast the girl's mother would have been spared, let her lil heart not become repulsive on the existence of that love and trust in this world of betrayals.

True their relation was nowhere near to be called a marraige in real terms also true that the term marriage become nothing before the depth of their bond.I am not sure if I believe only in the end goals but not the paths chosen. Anirudh is young , inexperienced and can make mistakes..But here the mistake cost the essence of their bond, that bond which was beyond the name of 'shadi'.Mistake isnt essentially in annulment. But all the ways he has chosen to land there

Bondita's perception on annulment is strictly personal now, her patibabu doesnot belive in it ..not man se rishta joda...She was kept inside a safe bubble until now and straight away breaking to the furnace society.Is she even aware of why child marriage is a social evil.Is it even communicated to her properly.

The very same Anirudh who hid marriage truth because its not good for the mental health of child ,is now not concerned about the concept of mental health.The very same Bondita who asked why bachon ki shadi galat he aur kya hamara shadi bhi galat he is gayab now and even after all the turn of events , Anirudh as said before still believe its not time to discuss about it, because she is too young for the concept?

Annulment track if wanted could have been brought about in a more sensible and realistic way

Originally posted by: faja

UL:: A big question. laws doesn't mean society and acceptance, proof for such malpractices existing even the day.

What would be Anirudh's take on the changed approach of society to Bon, now? Will he fight those stone pellets to her in the name of her character ?

@ Bold : what are we expecting? The honest answer is I dont know what to expect.It by in itself is a complex situation with many layers, with Anirudh complicating it more with his twisted plots. In the whole process atleast the girl's mother would have been spared, let her lil heart not become repulsive on the existence of that love and trust in this world of betrayals.

True their relation was nowhere near to be called a marraige in real terms also true that the term marriage become nothing before the depth of their bond.I am not sure if I believe only in the end goals but not the paths chosen. Anirudh is young , inexperienced and can make mistakes..But here the mistake cost the essence of their bond, that bond which was beyond the name of 'shadi'.Mistake isnt essentially in annulment. But all the ways he has chosen to land there

Bondita's perception on annulment is strictly personal now, her patibabu doesnot belive in it ..not man se rishta joda...She was kept inside a safe bubble until now and straight away breaking to the furnace society.Is she even aware of why child marriage is a social evil.Is it even communicated to her properly.

The very same Anirudh who hid marriage truth because its not good for the mental health of child ,is now not concerned about the concept of mental health.The very same Bondita who asked why bachon ki shadi galat he aur kya hamara shadi bhi galat he is gayab now and even after all the turn of events , Anirudh as said before still believe its not time to discuss about it, because she is too young for the concept?

Annulment track if wanted could have been brought about in a more sensible and realistic way

To be honest the characters have gone to a certain tangent where analyzing their actions is hard.

Both are different from what they were and what they would have been. Anirudh has always shown that he never understands the consequences of his actions. However righteous they may be he never sees the in depth consequence until it happens infront of him.

I am not whitewashing the character because I myself dont know what they are now. Its just so different. The Bondita wouldnt have been like this, She wouldnt have been this way

And Anirudh was reckless but to such degree was never thought off...his mistakes will definitely lead to greater problems.

Somewhere his concept of keeping her in dark is not beneficial for her...

Originally posted by: Alexia_Wilson

Exactly where my doubts are

Anirudh never thought about it. He has always been reckless. He surely knew he could have a chance at winning or was he so sure of losing that he never thought what might happen when the petition wins.

The whole promo can mislead so many of the people out here

Audience are going to see this show from Anirudh and Bondita's eyes and both are upset

Bondita we can understand to an extent but Anirudh..he knew that emotions are to be kept away from the court. But why did he forget that this will also affect him?

His hastiness made him ignore? Or did he think it will be different for him?

Anirudh the barrister would only be happy in winning..Its Anirudh the pati babu or Biristra babu is upset on the personal side on losing her. I felt it to be a natural response. Is it a new thing that Anirudh cried after his actions? Everytime it only happened right?.Anirudh used annulment as a weapon to back off Bondita from her antics of patni dharm.Now he feel Bon is sorted. We cannot neglect the fact, that although Ani was against child marriage, he initiated it now for his personal reason. He was aware of the consequences. In fact I believe he is truly aware what child marriage would do to girls of under age.so only he is so repulsive of any thing thrown on their relation by society under the label of Zemmidari. He carefully protected and believed Bon is safe in his shade until it reached a phase where he cannot deny. However much he called zemindari, he at some point had started living their marriage in their on terms completely out of context of real marriage. However he claim their shadi has nothing to do with their rishta, he somewhere knows deep down that name of shadi only gave him right over her even in those times of Bedwetting when she was told to be send back and in HIra Mandi and chodi hui aurat..Bon meri patni hai came to exercise his right on her for her good may it be

So isnt it human for him to feel sad. However incompatale a relation is, while breaking it up people will have mixed feeling.After all one has spend time effort and emotions there.Here infact they had such an amazing rappot in their own way

Koi BON ko shantineketan bhej do is dogle ARC aur RC haveli se bohut dur.

Originally posted by: Indira12

Thank You for sharing Ash ❤️

I guess makers from a long time gave us hints that Rudhita might not be on the cards, but we were so much attached that we tried to overlook it.

They gave a slow destruction to the Rudhita essence, starting from Ani's explanation of the doha and his 'zindagi bhar ka pyaar', and it slowly and gradually began to lose it's charm. So much so that now when we see this we feel that they should be separated because the point to which they have come, it makes no sense to stay together or atleast should not be bonded by the sacred thread of marriage.

I don't know if they will continue their marriage or not but I feel if Ani is allowed to have a hundred emotions because he is a human, Bon too should have someone other than Ani, obviously LATER. I know she loves him (platonically) but if Ani can move out of love, Bon too can do it. She is not bound to fall for Ani just because he has done so much for him (Bon too has done a lot for him, starting from saving his life three times, forgiving Ani's father for all the wrongs he did against her, saved RCs in the nick of time from becoming the slave to GW, and obviously binding the family with all of her love and care, but it does not gets the deserved limelight).

As far as the law is concerned, well the makers have proved it from time to time that they lack knowledge in history, dates and facts. It became an act in 1929 and the show is set in 1920 currently. It was not very easy to pass this law as depicted in the show. Plus, when the act came into force it did not nullified the already existing marriages, except those where the girl wanted it. So no relatability with those.

But yes, IF, I repeat IF they 'want' Bon and Ani separating ways and having a different life partner, we should be prepared for it (no matter how much of an ardent shipper of Rudhita I was 😭).

LOL I'm not even Indian and even I know that know justice system in the world would think to make a law that reverses past incidents, because all of a sudden creating a law that makes already existing marriages also illegal in an attempt to reverse the past would cause an unimaginable disaster.

Originally posted by: sammy17

LOL I'm not even Indian and even I know that know justice system in the world would think to make a law that reverses past incidents, because all of a sudden creating a law that makes already existing marriages also illegal in an attempt to reverse the past would cause an unimaginable disaster.

Exactly if the law makes AniDita's marriage illegal then the rest of the marriages of this kind are also illegal. What happens to the couples who have kids?? Will they be declared illegitimate?? Also, the show is set in 1920 & the law passed in 1929 so historically also inaccurate...

Any such law will only be for the future because there may be many couples who may come in that category if all such marriages become null and void then a huge cry will rise because in that era when the story is happening it was common place so this phase in story appears so silly

Even today on Akshaya trithiya such mass child marriages take place despite it being illegal they are also reported in the newspapers

today in India one of the newspapers carried the news that Pandemic led to 27% rise in child marriages😕

Originally posted by: sunshinesamuef

Exactly if the law makes AniDita's marriage illegal then the rest of the marriages of this kind are also illegal. What happens to the couples who have kids?? Will they be declared illegitimate?? Also, the show is set in 1920 & the law passed in 1929 so historically also inaccurate...

I think it would not be like law make the earlier marriages illegal. Anirudh wants to nullify theirs so it would be illegal .The reason why Anirudh filed petition it self was more of personal

To everyone talking about the historical inaccuracy- I had lost all hopes when I had seen the ad of an aged Gandhi and NO mention of the stalwarts who actually promoted female education in those days and before.

Can you imagine a story set in Bengal during those times when they can bring an aged Gandhiji but not exclusively talk about Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Dwarakanath Ganguly, Durga Mohan Roy or even KC Sen for that matter- the people who actually influenced Bengal and a major part of India to encourage women's education. Would it be possible to believe that such a well-read man like Aniruddh wouldn't know about them?

So nope history toh long ago I have ignored.

But from this promo I had a question

The rule is stopping child marriage- that surely would be for the upcoming ones right? Or will it be applicable to the people already married? Because then thats a but weird, right?