Is this legal? - Page 5

Originally posted by: basherz

ITV female leads are all superwomen. They are better detectives than police, better armed trained people than the armed forces - who train for 1000's of hours. They can handle anything, let it be wild animals, natural calamities & what not, nothing shakes them.

Originally posted by: basherz

ITV female leads are all superwomen. They are better detectives than police, better armed trained people than the armed forces - who train for 1000's of hours. They can handle anything, let it be wild animals, natural calamities & what not, nothing shakes them.

Originally posted by: ltelidevara

Till now Sai is not shown to handle anything you mentioned above. When she went to save Pulkit then also he was already freed by Bhavani. Neither in Gadchiroli nor in Chavan Nivas Sai never did anything to be qualified as mahan Bahu. Even her plan to trap Amay also was shown stupid and risky. Getting Devi married also not being shown as mahan Karya because already Pakhi’s parents got it and revealed. So including Sai with other itv charecters and mahan Bahu s is not valid. Till now Sai was shown committing mistakes and faltering every now and then.

All the ITV bahus start as abla naris only, they take upon the mantle of the "Earth" once, they are settled into the marriage mostly.

The main characteristic of an ideal ITV bahu, is to take responsibility of the entire family on their shoulders, without consulting or taking help from other family members - like Shivani bua earlier or now Devi's case.

Sai fits into perfect ITV bahu case already, she just needs promotion for the next stage & become a mahaan devi.

Originally posted by: 404_NotFound

IPS topper or chief minister is nothing infront of ITV Female lead . She will instead teach him law when he will go to arrest Pulkit . ITV FIL can never go wrong .

So IPS topper didn’t know this when he decided to get his mentally unstable sister married to Pulkit , because it’s till happening without the consent of her mother her legal guardian .this is before the letter fiasco obviously

I think ITV FL and ML are made to be jokers here 😂😂

Originally posted by: ltelidevara

Till now Sai is not shown to handle anything you mentioned above. When she went to save Pulkit then also he was already freed by Bhavani. Neither in Gadchiroli nor in Chavan Nivas Sai never did anything to be qualified as mahan Bahu. Even her plan to trap Amay also was shown stupid and risky. Getting Devi married also not being shown as mahan Karya because already Pakhi’s parents got it and revealed. So including Sai with other itv charecters and mahan Bahu s is not valid. Till now Sai was shown committing mistakes and faltering every now and then.

Till date sai is never shown wrong by d makers she always made to look correct.

Is track mein bhi she will made to look correct that's why kidnapping drama planned

ITV ki FL kitni bhi galat kyu na ho har haal mein sahi sabit hoti hai by d makers or sirf unke pass akal hoti hai baki beakal hote hain, humesha ML ke khilaf kade hone unka haq hota hain lastly ML ko galat dekhana hota hai or wahi apni galti manta hai. Ye sab ITV ke rules hain .

Jis din ML ko sahi or FL ko galat dekha denge ussi din ITV pe earthquake or tsunami aa jayega.

Yaha bhi virat is shown idiot by trusting a random letter & not investigating properly but sai phir bhi sahi hai jabki she herself don't know anything about pulkit , she is blindly believing pulkit.

Originally posted by: notaquitter

So IPS topper didn’t know this when he decided to get his mentally unstable sister married to Pulkit , because it’s till happening without the consent of her mother her legal guardian .this is before the letter fiasco obviously

I think ITV FL and ML are made to be jokers here 😂😂

Kaku had given permission to virat to speak family matters , she dint objected virat openly coz she don't want to be in his Rader that's why thid planning plotting in absence of virat.Upar se she know virat is ACP she has to give a valid reason to him for stopping this marriage coz virat denied her other reasons of naukar ka beta types.

Kaku is guardian of devi , she never gave Sai d permission to interfer in her daughter's life.

Sai ke pass mauka tha virat ko sach batane ka which she earlier decided to but she choose pulkit above virat

She could had took help from DIG don't reveal ur name but do tell whats going wrong with a grl .

Dint Virat said he will reinvestigate

Originally posted by: notaquitter

So IPS topper didn’t know this when he decided to get his mentally unstable sister married to Pulkit , because it’s till happening without the consent of her mother her legal guardian .this is before the letter fiasco obviously

I think ITV FL and ML are made to be jokers here 😂😂

Didn’t the ML himself say to Sai that both of them are of age and we can get them married without the approval of the elders before he found out about the letter

Him being an IPS officer shouldn’t he know the law

CVS should do some background work before giving dialogues

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

Kaku had given permission to virat to speak family matters , she dint objected virat openly coz she don't want to be in his Rader that's why thid planning plotting in absence of virat.Upar se she know virat is ACP she has to give a valid reason to him for stopping this marriage coz virat denied her other reasons of naukar ka beta types.

Kaku is guardian of devi , she never gave Sai d permission to interfer in her daughter's life.

Sai ke pass mauka tha virat ko sach batane ka which she earlier decided to but she choose pulkit above virat

She could had took help from DIG don't reveal ur name but do tell whats going wrong with a grl

I am not talking about who is right here.

I think law is the same for everyone. The discussion here I believe is if an mentally unstable person can get married without the consent of the legal guardian. In this case it’s KAKU and she is against the marriage

we are not talking about ATLEAST I am not talking about Sai vs Virat here. Whoever did this it’s wrong acc to the legality discussion going on here

Originally posted by: notaquitter

Didn’t the ML himself say to Sai that both of them are of age and we can get them married without the approval of the elders before he found out about the letter

Him being an IPS officer shouldn’t he know the law

CVS should do some background work before giving dialogues

Aap IPS ki baat kar rahe ho ya doctor or to be doctor dono ko is baat ki koi chinta nahi ki ek mentally unstable person ki mental state kya hogi in events hain.

Unko sirf shaadi se matlab hain kyunki unke anusar devi ka ilaaj shaadi hain.

Originally posted by: notaquitter

I am not talking about who is right here.

I think law is the same for everyone. The discussion here I believe is if an mentally unstable person can get married without the consent of the legal guardian. In this case it’s KAKU and she is against the marriage

we are not talking about ATLEAST I am not talking about Sai vs Virat here. Whoever did this it’s wrong acc to the legality discussion going on here

Virat was publicly marrying devi with full knowledge of kaku , if kaku had problem with it she will object by telling d reason . Virat is devi's brother

Sai is marrying devi without d knowledge of kaku