It was too cheesy and the first scene was irritating where a london guy tortures Daksh. It throws foreigners in a very bad light. The sets are of Divya drishti's Shergill house's with absolutely no. change. The cinematography is the only thing that i found great. Other than that its way too typical. But yeah one thing that i found different is Nandini's character which is totally opposite from Charu. Her character is bubbly, loud and lively unlike Charu who is boring and all the time lecturing. Overall i would like to rate it 5/10 because of cinematography and Nandini's character.
Is she also tortured by her step-family? Or her story changed?
1k