Ayushmann Khurana is like 70s amol palekar his movies have a uniqueness that other stars movies do not have though hes not a great actor avergae one but great movie scripts
Only Rajkumar rao can compete with ayshmann in this unique space semi art movies kind
Ranbir kapoor is over rated yes he acts better than most now but brooding and sad face does not mean acting, his dialogue delivery has no variation, he has no great voice like a amitabh too to make audience feel for his dialogues. But he will survive another 10-20 years because of kapoor tag. Its like this after 80s the actors that have come are al avergae exception one or two. Just because ranbir acts better hes not great. Compare him to ab, dilip kumar he falls flat of face super stars of their times. He cannot do comedy not convincing in action only lover boy and brooding does not make an actor. Hes survived thanks to his affairs and break ups making headlines. He also knows his career would have ended if he had not used his gfs to stay in news from 16 years hes good at pr unlike ayushmann and ranveer added advantage of kapoor tag
Ranveer singh is next one. RS can act better than most but his clown act outside makes others not take him serious as a actor. Yes he goes overtop sometimes like khilji role. but ranbir or ayushmann or hrithik his main competitors can never do khilji or bajirao like him convincingly.
Regarding RS being successful because of deepika thats a joke. Both in bajiroa and padmavat audience praised ranveer not deepika or other actors. Credit for success goes to RS not deepika in both. Yes and music and cinematorgaphy thats SLB.
With worst story writing and no proper execution like all SLB movies RS carried movies on his shoulder and made them the huge hits single handedly. If music and cinematorgaphy could make movie success than hrithik, ranbir and srk could have made devdas and sawariya and guzaarish also hit because they also had half baked scripts like bajiroa and padmavaat. But its only RS that made them those huge hits. RS in like amitabh bachchan give him right role he will outshine everyone in frame no matter how much bigger they are than him
Definetly deepika very poor actress benefited from SLB and ranveer singh in 3 movies too. Specially bajirao and padmavaat side actors outshined deepika like malik kafur, meherunissa, kashi bai, bajirao mother etc . I would say deepika has only 10% hand in success of these movies 50% RS and 20% SLB 10% music 10% cinematography and locations
Yes SLB has big hand in deepika and ranveer becoming super star. But Ranveer singh has given SLB the success salman and srk or amitabh bachchancould not give him for 15 years thats truth. Its his ability to get into skin of role and become that character i historical roles especially. RS is like sohrab modi or prithviraj kapoor hes born to play historical characters his personality suits those roles. imagine ranbir, ayushman, srk, salman, amitabh, anil kapoor as kings or emperors can you they all flopped r shall flop bec they do not suit that personality
Pushpa Impossible
17