Rubina giving Rahul a title ! - Page 2

Originally posted by: ShahZur

Guys ,

I dont know who is supporting Rahul here .

But when Rubina called Rahul "a

Male chauvinistic " its a belief that men are superior to women.

Do you think this term was correctly used by Rubina for Rahul ?

First his chaddi , then his walk without chaddi adjusting his manhood and now this 🏷 label of chauvinistic male .

I find all distasteful! 🤢

Honestly this season the meaning of the words have been twisted and changed to fit ones own narrative. None of them have been used in true meaning of the word. So no point what the word was or how it was used 🤢

He’s a chauvinist and it’s pretty clear after seeing his behaviour in the house and his derogatory tweets on women. I don’t understand how can you justify it

Rahul is far from being a chauvinist, and says a woman who was just telling him mard ban.. khud pehle sochle.. wo chauvinist hai ya nahi

These days the words chauvinism are used like words like the words mad, idiot .. without a thought and concern about the repercussions for the person who it is being said about

She knows she'll be anyway given a free pass no matter what she says about him - be it MCP, chauvinist, patriarchial etc!

Yesterday she even implied some psychological problem related to Rahul🥱, I'm not sure what she meant there but I could see hardly any uproar Infact she was praised to infinity lol.

She even said - Men "cannot take"powerful women dragging in all men here just to show herself as some strong woman which she's definitely not and show one's against her as the chauvinistic ones. Ideally there can be much uproar on such generalization but this coming from Rubina is again a pearl of wisdom😆

So it's stupid to take any of her narratives for anyone to be taken seriously!

many ppl even in forum including myself has called rahul mcp......

Originally posted by: ShahZur

Guys ,

I dont know who is supporting Rahul here .

But when Rubina called Rahul "a

Male chauvinistic " its a belief that men are superior to women.

Do you think this term was correctly used by Rubina for Rahul ?

First his chaddi , then his walk without chaddi adjusting his manhood and now this 🏷 label of chauvinistic male .

I find all distasteful! 🤢

Bolo re bolo

#FakefeminismkaPrateekRubina Devi ki jai !!!

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Who's she to give a title to anybody?? Nobody cared, bcoz no one takes her seriously, not in the house, not outside. She outright invents new words, (remember, "rampenting' and "crafting"🤣🤣), so shes just trying to use fancy words here. Even her saamaan chided her once to not to use fancy words. That's why nobody took the clown on her words.

More than chauvinist, I take issue with her alleging - twice - that Rahul has psychological issues. Who is she to make statements like that, and what qualified her to allege such?

And I love how something like this is all well and good - no problem with her saying so - but let’s trash others jaise pata nahi kya paap kardiya.

Convenience ka buzzword usage and convenience ki outrage. Sahi hain.