Originally posted by: SimsNaiken
Jhada nahi discussion tha --- And US mein zara Waha kisi ke saath bina consent ke touch karkey azmalo -- you and i both know that there are no loop holes -- consent is not questionable.
I'm ignoring the snide remarks cause' I'm trying to reach across and genuinely discuss...
At this moment the fact that she over reacted becomes a moot point (which btw I agree she did) but consent is still exactly that consent.
This isn't about being a fangirl I have explained this many times. Between context and consent CONSENT will always win for me.
You and I are friends. I touch you normally and you don't mind. Then one day you and I are in an argument and I touch you as many times I may have innocently --- but this time you express not to be touched -- I simply apologize. Khallas. Khatam Finish. agey koi baath hi nahi hai.
It doesn't matter at this point if we have touched before or the intent of my relationship past with you. Yes I can definitely say to myself wtheck is his/her problem it wasnt even a big deal --- but I CANNOT --- I WILL never tell you, to tell me, that you shouldn't say that or that its not a big deal? Get it? Khallas
When it comes to consent -- there is only black and white for me. Be that a man, a woman a child or an animal. Bhoot ko bhi ko pooch ke chedey hum लोल
When people make grey areas regarding consent and try to justify the intent, the context the reasons or lack there of --- that tatti get real dark real soon...
It is NOT the touch so much that upset me --- it is Ejaz's post touch adamant stance that it was not a big deal that irked me more. That pissed me off so much more.
Had he just said whoa man my bad i had no intent but ok and go to hell you Rubina and continued on the fight I'd be penning down praises for him
CAUSE he has admitted he has an issue with touch so he OF ALL people should know better. The fact that Rubina made a big deal of a small thing is not the point here.. I will respond the same way if it was the other way around. I do not think Rubina is sans flaws but I definitely think she's a solid woman and I love her self assurance and the way she carries herself. I do not see her invade personal space in fights and her language is also not as foul.
Year this is last time --- Itna likh likh ke mein tho thak gayi
1. It was a hi5 in a game show. No big deal. Nothing to do with consent.
2. Her foul mouth racist comments and bringing up children repeatedly doesn’t show strength
3. Trying to sound smart while completely murder English language and inventing new words isn’t sign of strong and assured - but rather a deep inferiority complex :)
4. Her hubby did worse by pushing eijaz and actually did violate his personal space...
bas. Baaki to ankho pe patti lagao aur bolo mere saath — Rubina devi ki jai !! Sakshat devi ki jai !!