Bigg Boss 14 DDT 13/01/2021 - Page 72

Aj rubina madam ne bohot bare mudda banaye the when Eijaz gave a hi5 n played victim card n woman card .. aur kuch der pehle rubina confessed how she triggered eijaz by showing hand where Eijaz several time told dont show me hand like that ...

yeha log sab kar pate hain, apne convenience kay hisab se ro roke mudda bana lete hain, aur piche se conspiracy bhi banate hain

share the video on LF thread

Originally posted by: Silveraliax

It's not the same.

If tomorrow a man tells me I'm a wolf and I say, "tell this to your daughter that she's a wolf".

Am I saying his daughter is a wolf? Nope but am I wrong to randomly bring in his daughter, yes.

Rubina ka pearl cant be justified like meri choti finger dikhayi but she reacted so i continued it..

Madam rubina yes we agree aapne chotu ungli dikhayi maana arshi ne reaction diya aapko mazha aaya.. Hum pooch rahe hai aapka choti ungli aise hee utt gayee bina kuch matlab ki... Yes sir uska koi matlab nahin tha yunhi utt gayee

Concluaiin : rubina has lost sensibility in her small finger it reacts without her brain cells sending signals to chotu finger hainwayeee its serious medical condition..

Rubina aapne sonali ko kyun kahan pls apni beti ko boliye woh haram ki hai...

Answer : sir maine nahin bola sonali ki beti haram ki hai.. Maine bola jo abb apne bola housemates ko woh aap apni beti ko boliye woh haram ki hai ..ismaein koi gaali nahi thi, maine bacchi ko drag nahin kiya

Conclusion : rubina is pearl

Originally posted by: Ashhima3

it’s like, will you call your son a bast*** and still say it’s not an abuse! Sonali Arshi what they are isn’t the question! The one who claims to have high morals and teach others when they say all this, it shows how low they are! Actually the ones who have high morale never claim it

Ruby never claims she is a Devi come from svarga loka.

Will you call your son a bastaxd, is not same as, your son is a bastaxd. Of course the former is not an abuse.

Originally posted by: Silveraliax

I appreciate the example but I disagree. I would be upset that you brought in my father just like I am not supporting Ruby for bringing in a kid. But you did not imply that he's a thief because you know yourself you are only showing me a mirror. Intention matters.

Trying telling your father he is a thief.

VS

Your father is a thief.

I feel the latter is wrong.

baby sojao😆

Originally posted by: opsora2090

Aj rubina madam ne bohot bare mudda banaye the when Eijaz gave a hi5 n played victim card n woman card .. aur kuch der pehle rubina confessed how she triggered eijaz by showing hand where Eijaz several time told dont show me hand like that ...

yeha log sab kar pate hain, apne convenience kay hisab se ro roke mudda bana lete hain, aur piche se conspiracy bhi banate hain

https://twitter.com/SwaraaKarnik/status/1349386846057410561

Originally posted by: Silveraliax

Nah starting mein se he their relationship was questioned. Doing karwa chaut is giving their relationship a try which is what they're claiming. Rahul ki tarah nahi, showmance karne koh aaya tha despite having a gf.

Abhinav doesn't have an issue then why do you?

Aly and Rahul do get into each other's arguments, but comparing them two with a husband wife is a bit too much isn't it. Of course husband wife won't let their other half be alone. It's BB and audience who is keeping Abhinav in the show, not Ruby's problem.

Showmance karne aaya tha par kiya toh nahi usne. Apni Gf ko propose karke yeh showmance wala angle hi khatam kar diya usne. Aur usne apni marzee se propose kiya tha, koi immunity stone paane ke liye nahi kiya tha.

Meri marzee, rakhungi mein iss baat par issue. Yeh show ka theme hi yahi hai ki audience contestants ko unki personality ke hisaab se judge kare. Mereko Rubina ka voh divorce wali baat apni husband ki permission ke bina batana immorally wrong laga toh hai mujhe iss baat par issue. And, initially, Abhinav ko bhi tha iss baat se issue, usne bola bhi tha Rubina ko.

Bold - You proved my point ki Abhinav-Rubina ki situation ko Rahul-Aly se compare nahi kiya jaa sakta. Aly ka support toh phir bhi Rahul ke liye badal sakta hai par Rubina will always enjoy the benefit of his husband's support jab tak Abhinav hai uss ghar mein. Hence, mera initial argument ki Rubina is a hypocrite for taunting others for not playing alone.

Originally posted by: born-leader

Correct me if I'm wrong: you said that she didn't abuse her daughter. And I think you think that members here are quoting her incorrectly. My point is: how is indirectly abusing a minor not abuse?

A calls B bast**d, to which B asks A how they will react if their child is called bast**d. This was Rubina's explanation, right? Here, she was wrong. Could have said how she would have reacted had she used such words for her blah blah. And this is why most people think that she did abuse the minor.

It's abusing if Ruby said, your daughter is a bastaxd. Did Ruby say this? If answer is no then you know what it means.

I have mistakenly stepped into Live feed thread? I thought this was DDT.

Originally posted by: Nachiketj

I have mistakenly stepped into Live feed thread? I thought this was DDT.

Originally posted by: Silveraliax

Ruby never claims she is a Devi come from svarga loka.

Will you call your son a bastaxd, is not same as, your son is a bastaxd. Of course the former is not an abuse.

she always claimed, we don’t do this, we don’t use such words! Infact called out for samaan! A woman who made issue for samaan says will you call your daughter ha*** ki? And she never claimed she is devi? And it’s not in literal sense! She has always said I m righteous and this definitely isn’t right