Does love for Rahul reflect out Patriarchal mindset? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Deviant_Pixel

You know what? Eg. you and I do not support the same contestant, but I don't think supporting Eijaz reflects SOMETHING about you or vice versa (i hope). Its all about the game and perspective of what we see as right/wrong in the situation.

It doesn't. I don't even judge the ones supported Sidharth last season. I'm friends with many of those who supported my same favs as well as Sid. Then why I shouldn't judge them for supporting him. It's individual perspective. Last year I used to say this how can sane person support him but now I realise it's all about different perspective & Sid clicked with them. I've friends who had supported strong women contestants previously who were my favs so It'd be bad on my part to say they've misogynist sexist mentality.

Originally posted by: BBFanForever

It doesn't. I don't even judge the ones supported Sidharth last season. I'm friends with many of those who supported my same favs as well as Sid. Then why I shouldn't judge them for supporting him. It's individual perspective. Last year I used to say this how can sane person support him but now I realise it's all about different perspective & Sid clicked with them. I've friends who had supported strong women contestants previously who were my favs so It'd be bad on my part to say they've misogynist sexist mentality.

Well said. Dekho connection can be for any reason maybe something just clicks with you, we all have different perspectives. I agree I used to get in the same anger about Shukla but I understood somewhere ki no this does not speak about the person rather their perceived notions of the situation.

But yeah one thing I keep learning is ki ho jaata hai, you get attached to contestant and defend them here , we are human after all😆

Oh yes, and yes, and 100 times yes. Ofcourse, we all are patriarchal cavemen , fir liking Rahul and disliking the Nalli Devi of the forum.

Ofcourse, it’s Rubbu Devi who started name calling ppl and making comments on aukath and parvarish.......but so what? Don’t u dare it call wrong, bcoz..*drumroll*...... she’s a woman. Women card pe sab chaltha hain.
And how dare for Rahul to give it back to the bully Devi in her own language? So what she called him chuchundar, criminAl, misogynist and what not...... but Tahul has commited blasphemy when he called her safed bandariya and black hearted, bcoz.....*drumroll* .......she’s a woman.

Let’s all of us worship at the altar of the forum’s Rubbu Devi to cleanse ourselves of our sins of Patriarchy and mysogyny. 🛐

On a serious note, Patriarchy, my foot😡.
BTW...... I’m happy that there are already topics opening up on Rahul’s name, even before his return👍. Return ke baad tho forum pe chaa jaayega bhidu 🥳😎

Originally posted by: Deviant_Pixel

Well said. Dekho connection can be for any reason maybe something just clicks with you, we all have different perspectives. I agree I used to get in the same anger about Shukla but I understood somewhere ki no this does not speak about the person rather their perceived notions of the situation.

But yeah one thing I keep learning is ki ho jaata hai, you get attached to contestant and defend them here , we are human after all😆

Exactly. When we get attached we continue defending and supporting them no matter what cheap thing they do. Just like parents love their children irrespective of their wrong doings!

Originally posted by: arsneh

Taking Rahul vaidya side isn't for supporting patriarchal mindset but an opposition of fake feminism flag HMS of BB are raising darling

see supporting patriarchy mindset will be if Rahul Vaidya is supported for all the bad words used against women while women been saint to him and other HMS been great with other women and never did what Rahul does atleast

Here HMS and fans are selectively picking up the incidence where Rahul went wrong with women but forgetting what the woman did to instigate the reaction

For example calling a girl safed bandariya is extremely wrong admit it but did women call the guy chachhundar and remind him about his aukaat is right?

IMO either both are wrong or both are right we can't selectively call woman right coz she is woman

another incidence was when Rahul commented on crush thing everybody reacted to fiercely against him for disrespecting women to the extent pav went on saying women are victims of such mentality of men( while pav herself said she have a crush on Abhinav and wanna go on date with him) while when nikki mentioned about DM thing everybody name called and blamed Rahul if calling crush was pav choice DMing was rahul choice if nikki had a problem she should have never replied or blocked or reported why play on with DM thing then complaint about it on NTV and ruin a guy's image

or only girls have a image to carry forward guy's don't have?

also why its selective when nikki complained about jaan kissing her why everybody blamed nikki that u gave him chance if rahul is being ridiculed for DMing why jaan isn't being ridiculed for kissing

third case was jas case where she used swore word threw water on him nobody said jas is wrong doing so until rahul questioned them about it

I agree guy says lots of wrong stuffs but does other guy's don't?

aly called kavita neech aurat why he wasn't ridiculed for it? when the guy calling rubina safed bandariya and nikki Tommy is ridiculed

Eijaz towered over kavita and jas but why he was justified while rahul pulling a bag forcefully in task (which he didn't)is wrong?

Abhinav towering over nikki is ok doing creepy mazak with her is fine saying kavita laafa maarunga is right but if another guy does verbal mocking to his wife without using a single swore word is wrong and disrespect for woman to an extent the will be termed as borderline misogynist?

is there a rule a woman can call names and use swore words against man and other woman is fine but if a guy does that to a woman or other guy he is I'll mannered and bad guy.

If no why pav is not ridiculed for using swore words against rahul and rubina for using against kavita?

In my dictionary Patriarchy mindset is if guy will dominating and said to be right while the woman only be sufferer

where is fake feminism is using the opportunity selectively by women for their benefit jab man kare equality dedo jab mn kare aadmi aurat khel lo

Feminism is actually equality of women in all aspects

while in BB house what women (specially rubina) is doing to use women card for her benefit and feminism for her benefit time to time and the Irony is in order to prove on guy bad all HMS are following this thinking without giving any logic to it

I favour Rahul Vaidya not bcoz I agree with what he said but bcoz I find him victim of selective judgement

Absolutely agree. Why selective judgments only towards Rahul? thank you for the post.

Originally posted by: Equine

Oh yes, and yes, and 100 times yes. Ofcourse, we all are patriarchal cavemen , fir liking Rahul and disliking the Nalli Devi of the forum.

Ofcourse, it’s Rubbu Devi who started name calling ppl and making comments on aukath and parvarish.......but so what? Don’t u dare it call wrong, bcoz..*drumroll*...... she’s a woman. Women card pe sab chaltha hain.
And how dare for Rahul to give it back to the bully Devi in her own language? So what she called him chuchundar, criminAl, misogynist and what not...... but Tahul has commited blasphemy when he called her safed bandariya and black hearted, bcoz.....*drumroll* .......she’s a woman.

Let’s all of us worship at the altar of the forum’s Rubbu Devi to cleanse ourselves of our sins of Patriarchy and mysogyny. 🛐

On a serious note, Patriarchy, my foot😡.
BTW...... I’m happy that there are already topics opening up on Rahul’s name, even before his return👍. Return ke baad tho forum pe chaa jaayega bhidu 🥳😎

😆

Oh I don’t know about such sweeping generalizations. Some of us have a problem with both misogyny and a narcissistic, holier than thou personality. For some of us - what’s wrong for the goose is wrong for the gander.

A woman will be thrown out of this house and publicly shamed for how some of the men in the BB house have acted. When men do it, it's "oh they're just men hehe they have anger and temper <3"

I will admit Rahul is not a full-fledged Shukla but he has definitely said things in and out of the house which points to his sexism.

I agree YES. Everybody should criticize him for his behavior but instead people are supporting him.

Kabir Singh one of the biggest hits last year, Shukla the winner of last year, constant slug-shaming of Swara, Tapsee, Richa, Ekta getting rape threats and Rahul all of this points towards internalized misogyny