Does love for Rahul reflect out Patriarchal mindset?

He's forgiven for his sexist/pukeworthy comments but ppl have problem with rubina because she's bossy?

Is our society incorrigibly patriarchal and unapologetically chauvinistic ?

Absolutely.

Same thing happened last year too. Toxic male behaviour was applauded and Rashmi was made fun of.

Host is himself extremely small-minded and misogynistic so this is expected.

Originally posted by: Hichki

He's forgiven for his sexist/pukeworthy comments but ppl have problem with rubina because she's bossy?

Is our society incorrigibly patriarchal and unapologetically chauvinistic ?

Oh God yes. Look at Shukla last season. India loves these kind of toxic males. That’s all you see in the movies etc. As long as “his heart is in the right place” or “he means well” 7 khoon maaf hai ...... provided the the abused is a woman.


His mard ban Mard ban comments weren’t even addressed. And now he’s coming back to BB — pada likha ker patti pareke bhejengey wapis 🤷🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️

exactly aur yahi same cheez koi ladki kare toh usey degrade kiya jaata hai,usey support nahi kiya jaata

Taking Rahul vaidya side isn't for supporting patriarchal mindset but an opposition of fake feminism flag HMS of BB are raising darling

see supporting patriarchy mindset will be if Rahul Vaidya is supported for all the bad words used against women while women been saint to him and other HMS been great with other women and never did what Rahul does atleast

Here HMS and fans are selectively picking up the incidence where Rahul went wrong with women but forgetting what the woman did to instigate the reaction

For example calling a girl safed bandariya is extremely wrong admit it but did women call the guy chachhundar and remind him about his aukaat is right?

IMO either both are wrong or both are right we can't selectively call woman right coz she is woman

another incidence was when Rahul commented on crush thing everybody reacted to fiercely against him for disrespecting women to the extent pav went on saying women are victims of such mentality of men( while pav herself said she have a crush on Abhinav and wanna go on date with him) while when nikki mentioned about DM thing everybody name called and blamed Rahul if calling crush was pav choice DMing was rahul choice if nikki had a problem she should have never replied or blocked or reported why play on with DM thing then complaint about it on NTV and ruin a guy's image

or only girls have a image to carry forward guy's don't have?

also why its selective when nikki complained about jaan kissing her why everybody blamed nikki that u gave him chance if rahul is being ridiculed for DMing why jaan isn't being ridiculed for kissing

third case was jas case where she used swore word threw water on him nobody said jas is wrong doing so until rahul questioned them about it

I agree guy says lots of wrong stuffs but does other guy's don't?

aly called kavita neech aurat why he wasn't ridiculed for it? when the guy calling rubina safed bandariya and nikki Tommy is ridiculed

Eijaz towered over kavita and jas but why he was justified while rahul pulling a bag forcefully in task (which he didn't)is wrong?

Abhinav towering over nikki is ok doing creepy mazak with her is fine saying kavita laafa maarunga is right but if another guy does verbal mocking to his wife without using a single swore word is wrong and disrespect for woman to an extent the will be termed as borderline misogynist?

is there a rule a woman can call names and use swore words against man and other woman is fine but if a guy does that to a woman or other guy he is I'll mannered and bad guy.

If no why pav is not ridiculed for using swore words against rahul and rubina for using against kavita?

In my dictionary Patriarchy mindset is if guy will dominating and said to be right while the woman only be sufferer

where is fake feminism is using the opportunity selectively by women for their benefit jab man kare equality dedo jab mn kare aadmi aurat khel lo

Feminism is actually equality of women in all aspects

while in BB house what women (specially rubina) is doing to use women card for her benefit and feminism for her benefit time to time and the Irony is in order to prove on guy bad all HMS are following this thinking without giving any logic to it

I favour Rahul Vaidya not bcoz I agree with what he said but bcoz I find him victim of selective judgement

Originally posted by: Taylor_Swift

Absolutely.

Same thing happened last year too. Toxic male behaviour was applauded and Rashmi was made fun of.

Host is himself extremely small-minded and misogynistic so this is expected.

OMG Poor bichari homophobic, misogynist, sidhi Saadi Rashmi😭

Also her famous line which ain’t mention here “Mard ban(sounds like Rahul V) aurto jaise nh kar” bichari misogynist 😭

She was trolled for taking higher moral ground when she wasn’t any better

No Rahul is not forgiven for his misogynistic ways by neutral audience. Just like Rubina fans find her flawless, Rahul fans does it too.

But some of us can see how bs are both of them.

Originally posted by: arsneh

Taking Rahul vaidya side isn't for supporting patriarchal mindset but an opposition of fake feminism flag HMS of BB are raising darling

see supporting patriarchy mindset will be if Rahul Vaidya is supported for all the bad words used against women while women been saint to him and other HMS been great with other women and never did what Rahul does atleast

Here HMS and fans are selectively picking up the incidence where Rahul went wrong with women but forgetting what the woman did to instigate the reaction

For example calling a girl safed bandariya is extremely wrong admit it but did women call the guy chachhundar and remind him about his aukaat is right?

IMO either both are wrong or both are right we can't selectively call woman right coz she is woman

another incidence was when Rahul commented on crush thing everybody reacted to fiercely against him for disrespecting women to the extent pav went on saying women are victims of such mentality of men( while pav herself said she have a crush on Abhinav and wanna go on date with him) while when nikki mentioned about DM thing everybody name called and blamed Rahul if calling crush was pav choice DMing was rahul choice if nikki had a problem she should have never replied or blocked or reported why play on with DM thing then complaint about it on NTV and ruin a guy's image

or only girls have a image to carry forward guy's don't have?

also why its selective when nikki complained about jaan kissing her why everybody blamed nikki that u gave him chance if rahul is being ridiculed for DMing why jaan isn't being ridiculed for kissing

third case was jas case where she used swore word threw water on him nobody said jas is wrong doing so until rahul questioned them about it

I agree guy says lots of wrong stuffs but does other guy's don't?

aly called kavita neech aurat why he wasn't ridiculed for it? when the guy calling rubina safed bandariya and nikki Tommy is ridiculed

Eijaz towered over kavita and jas but why he was justified while rahul pulling a bag forcefully in task (which he didn't)is wrong?

Abhinav towering over nikki is ok doing creepy mazak with her is fine saying kavita laafa maarunga is right but if another guy does verbal mocking to his wife without using a single swore word is wrong and disrespect for woman to an extent the will be termed as borderline misogynist?

is there a rule a woman can call names and use swore words against man and other woman is fine but if a guy does that to a woman or other guy he is I'll mannered and bad guy.

If no why pav is not ridiculed for using swore words against rahul and rubina for using against kavita?

In my dictionary Patriarchy mindset is if guy will dominating and said to be right while the woman only be sufferer

where is fake feminism is using the opportunity selectively by women for their benefit jab man kare equality dedo jab mn kare aadmi aurat khel lo

Feminism is actually equality of women in all aspects

while in BB house what women (specially rubina) is doing to use women card for her benefit and feminism for her benefit time to time and the Irony is in order to prove on guy bad all HMS are following this thinking without giving any logic to it

I favour Rahul Vaidya not bcoz I agree with what he said but bcoz I find him victim of selective judgement

Yes to everything you wrote 👏. Can't add anything more as you pretty much summed it up, this micro analyzing of everything he does and justification if similar thing is done by another contestant. I don't want to get into naming incidents because fact of the matter is EVERYONE has blinders when it comes to they like and support.

Does our love for RubiNav reflect our snooty stuck-up snobbish classist mentality & looking down upon people?

Originally posted by: BBFanForever

Does our love for RubiNav reflect our snooty stuck-up snobbish classist mentality & looking down upon people?

You know what? Eg. you and I do not support the same contestant, but I don't think supporting Eijaz reflects SOMETHING about you or vice versa (i hope). Its all about the game and perspective of what we see as right/wrong in the situation.