Will nikki get bashed by salman ? - Page 4

Originally posted by: Aarzoo47

Nowhere it was written in task rulebook that u can't get physical, rahul repeatedly told her to put mask on table and to negotiate, if they can't agree then both will be nominated, he didn't want to do cheena jhapti, but insecure tamboli didn't want that at all and left him no option.

Okay, but the point is not about the rules here - no where in the rule book did it mention Niki couldn’t do what she did.

The whole “Niki should be bashed” is based on people’s moral grounds. However, the irony is that morally Niki is wrong but the fact Rahul was literally ON TOP of her snatching the mask is morally correct, according to some. I just find it hilarious.

I don’t think Niki was correct but if Rahul is given a free pass then so should Niki. If you cannot condemn Rahul, you shouldn’t have the right to condemn Niki.

Originally posted by: OMGITSME

Okay, but the point is not about the rules here - no where in the rule book did it mention Niki couldn’t do what she did.

The whole “Niki should be bashed” is based on people’s moral grounds. However, the irony is that morally Niki is wrong but the fact Rahul was literally ON TOP of her snatching the mask is morally correct, according to some. I just find it hilarious.

I don’t think Niki was correct but if Rahul is given a free pass then so should Niki. If you cannot condemn Rahul, you shouldn’t have the right to condemn Niki.

Nikki herself didn't object that rahul was on top of her bcoz she knows he wS doing task only, but he was humiliated and baffled by what she did its different plz stop trying so hard to justify that disgusting filthy act of hers..

Originally posted by: Aarzoo47

Nikki herself didn't object that rahul was on top of her bcoz she knows he wS doing task only, but he was humiliated and baffled by what she did its different plz stop trying so hard to justify that disgusting filthy act of hers..

Omg, just because Niki didn’t object that doesn’t mean it’s okay. Seriously?? According to the SAME logic, Niki was doing her task.

Also, you’ve again failed to respond to my main point. As you have read previously, I don’t agree with Niki. My main point is the hypocrisy people are showing. How can Rahul being ON TOP of Niki, using full strength get a free pass just because she didn’t say anything whereas Niki doesn’t get a free pass because Rahul spoke up. Sorry, but that sounds EXTREMELY foolish & rings so many bells on real life situations where this theory is used unjustly.

BOTH were wrong & only calling out Niki based on “moral grounds” shows a problem in the moral grounds people have set.

sahi suna raha hai ‘ye mera game hain. main aisa hi karungi. galat hai toh BB bolega......blah blah blah wali Nikki ko.

but what happened to host’s signature line ‘if you are uncomfortable or scared, peeche hatna tha.’

Originally posted by: OMGITSME

Omg, just because Niki didn’t object that doesn’t mean it’s okay. Seriously?? According to the SAME logic, Niki was doing her task.

Also, you’ve again failed to respond to my main point. As you have read previously, I don’t agree with Niki. My main point is the hypocrisy people are showing. How can Rahul being ON TOP of Niki, using full strength get a free pass just because she didn’t say anything whereas Niki doesn’t get a free pass because Rahul spoke up. Sorry, but that sounds EXTREMELY foolish & rings so many bells on real life situations where this theory is used unjustly.

BOTH were wrong & only calling out Niki based on “moral grounds” shows a problem in the moral grounds people have set.

if nikki put the object on the table and then grabbed it later then rahul would be wrong to forcefully take it away from her

but she didnt even gave him a chance to fairly get it which makes rahuls actions kinda ok (you are exaggerating by highlighting that he was "on top" all what he did was trying to snatch it away from her)

but what nikki did was a whole another level of disgusting morally

you CANNOT put it on the same level as to what rahul did

Salman Jiiii Bht Tarif karenge ..

Salman Ji - Tamboli Tum Jo b Boli Bilkul Sahi Boli ..waah..Kya Boli !! Ab nahi he tumhari koi Toli ...Wah..wah..Tamboli ...😆🤣

Originally posted by: ayaan786

if nikki put the object on the table and then grabbed it later then rahul would be wrong to forcefully take it away from her

but she didnt even gave him a chance to fairly get it which makes rahuls actions kinda ok (you are exaggerating by highlighting that he was "on top" all what he did was trying to snatch it away from her)

but what nikki did was a whole another level of disgusting morally

you CANNOT put it on the same level as to what rahul did

Again, who is talking about the task? We are talking about the hypocrisy of the current “moral grounds” set. Calling Niki wrong because it’s “disgusting morally” is hypocritical if you cannot call Rahul wrong. Rahul was also “morally disgusting” - you can not get on top of a girl like that and I don’t care if he was doing his task - SO WAS NIKI. If you think that’s okay, then I have nothing to say after that because then there’s a difference between our definition of morality.

They both were as wrong as each other in the task, but to label ones action as morally correct but the other as morally wrong is a fault in the moral standards.