How is filing a lawsuit means that Bollywood is acting holier than thou? I didn’t understand. They are not shouting or creating unnecessary ruckus on social media. Claiming they are great or some thing like what Kangana does. They are taking a quieter route and a legal route which is well within their rights. As per you news channels vilifying people on flimsiest evidence or no evidence is normal so those who are being vilified can’t even take a legal route? Don’t understand this logic.If Bollywood people would have been inciting their fans and followers on SM claiming they are great people and media is awful I would have agreed with you. But they are not. They are taking a quiet legal route which is well within their rights.Originally posted by: Veni-Vidi-Vici
They won't.. They will target only those who are against them just like how ab ordinary citizen does ... Even though they proclaim themselves as high priest of righteousness, we all know they aren't... Why would they target misinformation campaign when they themselves have been guilty of it.
Mahesh bhatt was a guest at a book release event where a conspiracy theory on 26/11 being a rss job was released... Now if that was freedom of expression then why was the book on alternative perspective to Delhi riots blocked.. Why was Bloomsbury bullied into dropping the book? Why did the authors have to Garuda Prakashan? It does show how things work.
When Barkha can get away with 'error of judgement' defense why can't.. Didn't her reporting during kargil, terrorist attacks lead to loss of lives.. How responsible where the right leaning media then? They were also irresponsible.. Riots coverage is never done sensitively.. We all know how death toll is released just to sensationalise.. It is in their interests to keep the pot boiling. Didn't even Ravish Kumar identify Jafrabad shooter as Anurag Mishra and not mohd Shahrukh.. Didn't the original anurag mishra-a guy with political leanings get into trouble because of it... No one can give out names willy nilly..why identify in the first place? And that too with due diligence . This is as insidious as the right wing's naxal bhabhi narrative.. Both would for ent trouble. I don't believe that any of top journos heart is in the right place.. Manipulation is all that do.
What apologies will be tendered to people wrongly accused of crimes.. Jasleen kaur case, Rohtak sisters case? Weren't the whole of the media involved.. Now it is a very grey area on what to report or not.. Media sometimes can't wait till the resolution of a case to report on it.
Just think about Sudeeksha bhati case - the girl had won a scholarship and was studying in the US.. Had come to bulandshahar for holidays and died in a road accident.. Her family alleged eve teasing.. Media took it up.. Two innocents were arrested and shamed.. A lot of people were mocked.. What happened in the end? The SIT acquitted the accused based on CCTV evidence. The cousin driving the vehicle was underage and didn't have a DL... Was the media wrong in taking up the case? How can anyone know prima facie who is lying.. While eve teasing is frequent in India, accusing innocents of it is also a crime.. What recourse do the innocents have? People know about the case but not about the clean chit..I read about the progress of the case on India today and was shocked
I am not telling that Rhea deserves what she got.. But what I am telling is that media outlets of all hues run vilification campaign on the ordinary citizens with the flimsiest of evidence.
It is just not republic but all news channels are guilty of it. I don't expect bollywood as a group to target others because even I would have done the same. What bothers me however is that they assume to be the conscience keeper of the nation.. Holier than thou attitude..
7