Urmila is a soft p0rn star - Kangana - Page 14

Originally posted by: tina59

Lol I assure you I am not

I am just a librarian and a mom of 2

Haha no chance! You're too polite and rational to be Kangu didi.

Originally posted by: diasingh2

Unfortunately, 90% replies on that youtube video are in favor of Kangana.

She is being hailed s Queen, "Rani LaxmiBai", "True Warrior" etc etc


Why Indian audience is so gullible?
Why can't they see through Kangana's bullshit??

I am not a Shiv Sena supporter and to be honest, I am enjoying this whole "Kangana vs Shiv Shena" drama coz dono parties ek hi thali ke chatte batte hain.

I support Urmila here, because she is class apart from Kangana,

Kangana is fake, and is literally fooling the audience.

I'm sure there is mass support for her in the hindi heartland of North India but dont forget to count the IT cell that is fanatical about likes and comments under videos of "their" ppl

Originally posted by: Pappu.Pager

This is elitism. No wonder you're a defender of nepotism.

This one is elitist, that one is anti hindu, that one is anti India, this one is tukde tukde gang. Bass yehi victimhood kartey rehna poorey time

Just like Didi herself who can spout gibberish the whole day and level serious allegations against people without proof and call them names like "rapist" and "murderers" and "suicide gang". But the moment someone answers back and shows her the mirror, we are back to victimization "Hayeeeee main bechari. India ki betiiii. Tu p*rnstar aur main feminist!! No one supported me!!! You are anti woman and anti hindu. Main akeliii"

Originally posted by: Sashay01

Well that's simply not true. A brief history lesson is in order, it seems.

Jaya was a topper at FTII in Pune. She is one of the few rare mainstream non arty heroines who was actually a trained actor and she was the best in her batch.

I've watched Amitabh say that when he and all his generation of actors were struggling they had heard of Jaya in acting circles because of her talent.

Jaya was then launched in Guddi by Hrishikesh Mukherjee who was like the Hirani of his time and went on to do several films with her and treated her like a protege. By contrast, Big B's first film with him was Anand where he played a two bit side hero to Rajesh Khanna and struggled for years as he gave 17 flops after that.

Whereas Jaya went on to do great work and hit films- Anamika, Koshish, Baawarchi (another Hrishikesh film) and Jawaani Diwani to name a few.

Then she was approached to do Zanjeer with an up and coming Amitabh and he was such a flop actor that all other actresses had said no. But she agreed and basically made his career because the film became a hit and launched his superstardom. They fell in love and became a hit pair- they did Mili, Chupke Chupke and Abhimaan together, again with Hrishikesh Mukherjee till she took a break to have Shweta.

She did take a backseat to have her kids, which a real FEMINIST would never throw shade at because it was a CHOICE she made.

She continued with her social work and became a Samajwadi Party MP. Her career and public life has been illustrious and full of courage. To say otherwise and claim that Big B made her is laughable. He cant even rein in her political views!!

BIgB has always given her full freedom over her life and choices. He has never restricted her path. Jaya can easily critise anyone without any issues.

Originally posted by: diasingh2

Unfortunately, 90% replies on that youtube video are in favor of Kangana.

She is being hailed s Queen, "Rani LaxmiBai", "True Warrior" etc etc


Why Indian audience is so gullible?
Why can't they see through Kangana's bullshit??

I am not a Shiv Sena supporter and to be honest, I am enjoying this whole "Kangana vs Shiv Shena" drama coz dono parties ek hi thali ke chatte batte hain.

I support Urmila here, because she is class apart from Kangana,

Kangana is fake, and is literally fooling the audience.

Sleeping with director to get movies is class apart?? She was RGV toy for so long. He played with her and threw her away. Thats class to you??? Wow.

Which world are we...just because she doesn't curse like Kangana doesn't make her class apart.

If Kangana is guilty so is Urmila...just because she doesn't curse doesn't make her a Saint.

Originally posted by: Terenaina

I don’t follow jaya’s story so good for her. And oh please the way you pull down people you dislike, Don’t act holier than thou. It’s a fact Kareena and others didn’t view rs as a hot property until SLB and dp gave him hits. Anyways out of this topic

I never said I don't pull anyone down😆 of course i do.. but you were pulling him down wrong I'm this one because your comparison was wrong..

You brought the out of topic not me

And I can act whichever way I want😆

Originally posted by: Pappu.Pager

It's selective outrage for members. They can pretty much call Kangana any names, but god forbid anyone else calls any of their favorites names. Also, selective quoting is great for them as well. They think Kangana is worse than Salman. These same people are the ones that go crazy for Aryan Khan's debut film... that hasn't even been filmed. LOL.

Yeah, Kangana's fans are not selective at all. All hell breaks loose when Kangana is called haraamkhor, but she has every right to abuse and degrade others.

Also, there's a difference between ordinary people calling someone names and an actor calling other actors names. But I don't expect Kagu lovers to comprehend such logic.

Originally posted by: don12

Sleeping with director to get movies is class apart?? She was RGV toy for so long. He played with her and threw her away. Thats class to you??? Wow.

Which world are we...just because she doesn't curse like Kangana doesn't make her class apart.

If Kangana is guilty so is Urmila...just because she doesn't curse doesn't make her a Saint.

Classic ad-hominem argument.😆
Urmila ko bash karke, Kangana sahi proof nahi hoti lol😆

Originally posted by: tina59

No, I don't coz I don't find the term soft po*n derogatory at all, just like how others in this very forum do not find calling wh*re, Psycho, crazy, stalker, psychopath, etc derogatory. Have you ever asked them this question? For me, any profession as long as it's recognized under the law is fine. So soft P*rn star or po*n star is not derogatory.

Another explanation could be, for those who haven't watched many movies are shown Urmila's dance numbers, they would come to the same assumption. However, I love Urmila as an actress and won't call her a soft po*r star but if someone who does not watch movies and is only exposed to her raunchy numbers then maybe their impression of them may differ.

Now coming to the other question, when Urmila call KR rudaali of Bollywood, did you find it derogatory coz I did. I read up on the term and it's derogatory, but no one here opposed it, this selective hypocrisy and crying out foul is only reserved for KR, I guess

The title is a reference to a custom in certain areas of Rajasthan where women of a lower caste are hired as professional mourners upon the death of upper-caste males. These women are referred to as a "rudaali" (roo-dah-lee), literally translated as "female weeper" or "weeping woman".

Okay, so calling someone a 'soft p*rn' star is not derogatory, but Rudaali is. 🤪How, where, and why can a sane human being come up with such out-of-the-universe logic.

Tell me something, how much do you get paid to represent her on this forum? Doesn't it physically hurt you to write such incredulous gibberish to defend Kangu's mentally unstable rants? I would look for another job if I were in your place.

Originally posted by: diasingh2

Classic ad-hominem argument.😆
Urmila ko bash karke, Kangana sahi proof nahi hoti lol😆

I am not proving Kangana right or wrong..i got no bone in the fight...i am here for entertainment...i am calling out people like you who are having double standards.

If a girl sleeps around she is termed is classy than a girl who has lose mouth..just because she is taking on someone who you may or may not like.