Members Only - SSR Case Discussion Thread#7 - Page 12

Originally posted by: SriRani

Sorry I missed the post. I will add you now.

Thanks 🤗

Originally posted by: zaroonkashaf

I think it's just weird. He gave an interview to one of the channels out there and talked about how Sushant was talking to him about some project a day earlier I think. Then you get to learn he was in touch with Rhea prior to Sushant's passing and even in July. If I'm not wrong he was Sushant's talent manager. I think one is just trying to piece things together here. Because it then makes you wonder how many of these people who gave interviews to media channels were getting their "versions" from Rhea. As in they were probably hearing her side of things. I doubt any of these people actually talked to his family. So no matter how diplomatic or candid these interviews were, the fact that some of them were in touch already with Rhea does raise a few eyebrows.

👍🏼Ah right! Makes sense. Thanks for putting this forward.

Did she named befitting reply factory ? Also, Swara Bhaskar

I believe Sara is not involved. Didn't rhea mentioned sara name in Aajtak interview? Then samuel started talking about sara along smita😕

Originally posted by: Ilahi_mera_Jiya

Saw on Twitter..

Rhea: They are asking me who are involved in drug dealing. Kitna bataun undo?

Simone : Kambatta

PS : Par usne lagta hai Sara bata diya🤣🤣

This is gold🤣

Originally posted by: Bekind

I believe Sara is not involved. Didn't rhea mentioned sara name in Aajtak interview? Then samuel started talking about sara along smita😕

Rhea left out Sara's name na? She told it was all boys Thailand trip. But people found out that sara also went with him and Rhea was lying. Are you talking about some other interview?

Some guest on Arnabs debate said they have booked the reporters under the same non-bailable section that is put on Rhea..... making it clear to be a vendetta against the republic reporters and also to hide whatever they are hiding...

He said the police are scared they will destroy evidences hence that section which doesn't make sense..,..wonder what evidences they will destroy