Originally posted by: nushy1995
Obviously it was unrealistic, and hence it was aashiqui, and hence I loved it, that the boundaries were known. True! Thanks for sharing your views.
Yeah! The boundaries made it more appealing. Personally I loved Ishaani's progression minus the noble-idiocy crap.
Plus I really loved the way they transitioned it from Ranveer's aashiqui to Ishaani's aashiqui on the KC night. Whoever wrote that sequence, I wanted to give him/her the tightest hug because very rarely I have watched transition to take place so smoothly.
Well, had seen randomly but found it hyped, possibly characters had arcs. Honestly what's new in that? Manhandling is justified by people..and most shows show the nonsense!
Edit : To add, people tell me, how they like these type, cos they feel actors get to execute talent more beautifully, what CRAP? Honestly, showing subtle emotions, and emotions without dialogues is an art!
Nothing new but like Nikki keeps saying, she kept lowest expectation and yet Gul disappointed her at several occasion in the later part of Nazar.
I could still understand manhandling but r**e attempt??? And I was actually reading an article on IF about which shows should come up with a Season 2 and most of them were toxic. I was like - HOW??? 😲 😲 😲
I do agree that aggression scenes need an emotional connect and actors get to showcase a lot. But subtlety is equally if not more difficult.
When in aggression, if you get over excited, it looks fake; in subtle scenes, if you can't pull it off, you come as plastic. Every scene has its value.
But is it necessary that outburst has to be only when romance is concerned or a guy manhandles a girl?
And honestly, till this day I find Vivian Dsena as plastic as I found him in PKYEK. Same I felt when I saw a promo of Shakti. I read people going gaga over DD's scene of when she was left at the alter. Watched that and realized Sana was 1000 times better in KD.
So it's really difficult to understand what people actually find to be good. 😳