Originally posted by: rkisnothot
Nice try but no cigar. If Ankita was getting to use a duplex, she should have been paying him rent for his portion. If not, they could have easily just split it back into two apartments and he could rent out his own apartment to someone else. That's if they didn't want to sell. Why was he financing a duplex for her? And she happily accepted this arrangement because it was beneficial to her.
Him paying for Rhea for a vacation is a different thing considering she was his actual girlfriend and not just an ex he was still footing the bills for. And one European vacation doesn't cost 60 lakhs which is at least the amount that was spent on Ankita after they already broke up. Couples can decide for themselves who's going to pay what. Rhea obviously earned a lot less than him so if he wanted an expensive vacation, he would probably have to pay for her.
Paying to house Ankita in a big apartment was a pittance, right? But Rhea was a user for going on a trip with her boyfriend. Okay.
I don't think Rhea and Sushant were living together formally anyway. How was he able to kick her out so easily in June if that was the case? Rhea also said she had her own small apartment which still has a 50 lakh loan on it that she was still paying. She has the papers for all this so it's not something she can lie about.
Also, not to forget the part where Rhea's Europe trip was planned because she had to go there on a brand commitment. The brand booked business class tickets (she claims to have proof), and Sushant made her cancel them and booked tickets for them together. So Sushant wasn't doing any favour. He was getting himself a trip for Rhea, and instead of the brand Sushant paid for it, on Sushant's own insistence.
Nobody says a word about the 70 lakhs Sushant spent on his 6 friends for his trip in Thailand? If a man can splurge on friends, wouldn't he spend on his own girlfriend? How's that exploitation?
Cricket
Hindi TV Shows
