Originally posted by: rkisnothot
No, she didn't prove anything. She just confused people to make herself look good.
Sushant and Ankita purchased two different apartments and then combined them to form a duplex that they lived in. When they broke up, Sushant moved out and Ankita continued to live in the duplex. She paid half the EMI and Sushant continued to pay the other half of the EMI, for an entire FIVE YEARS after he left. I think the EMI was over 1 lakh a month. So 12 lakhs a year minimum for 5 years. That's 60 lakhs he had spent on Ankita when they were not even dating.
Sushant paid the mortgage on a property he owned. Sure it makes it awkward, but if he didn’t wanna sell an asset, cuz it’s Mumbai and in general properties appreciate in value; he is paying to realize a greater equity.
this doesn’t prove Rhea wasn’t an user. Firstly, the mortgage is pittance compared to his salary/ year and it’s going towards an asset. Second, She got a lot more in return for free- the euro trip that she herself said he paid for. Paris, Swiss, Italy are all expensive places to visit and even for normal people sets them back $5k or more (being very cheapy here). Mr king and his queen lived it up. That right there would have been a pretty penny.
If we talk about equality, I don’t recall her saying she paid her share of the rent, or picking up the tab on living expenses when she lived with him with a team of servants.
Bigg Boss 19
