To meet the ends of justice, she should be allowed to speak.. It might be risky for her though as anything can be distorted in this battle of perception. I still don't know what to make of the circus. I don't know which side is guilty as it is hardly my field of expertise.
Rhea is definitely not dhoodh ki dhuli, she must be having a lot of negative traits, but one never knows what is the truth.. She could very very well have been made the fall guy.. If the media is holding a already holding a trial then she should also have the liberty to speak up and present her case. One sided narrative is always dangerous
Reminds me of a case where a family accused a doctor of a government hospital of not releasing the body of their loved one.. Accused him of asking for bribes and what not.. The women started wailing in front of the camera.. Lokayukta of Karnataka Venkatachalaih intervened and took the doctor to task. His image was maligned by the local media..
And one fine day it was revealed that the body the women were claiming actually belonged to someone else.. Some murder conspiracy and all that.. The doctor was actually going by the rules but the stereotypical image of a corrupt government servant made everyone jump the gun and blame him
I am definitely not saying Sushant's family is a fraud. They have my sympathies.. But unless you listen to both the sides, you can't tell who is right..
5